"I" Beam or "H" Beam rods
#1
TECH Junkie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Burleson/Ftw,Texas
Posts: 3,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I" Beam or "H" Beam rods
Which is stronger and best for boost build up?? I see that SDPC sells a set of "I" Crower rods for $435, but all the "H" beam rods are going for $485 and up, so which would be better??? I am tryin to reach a 550-650rwhp application.
#2
Both the Crower and almost any of the H beams will do that for you. The top quality I beams are billets so they are super stout. Most H beams are basicaly the same so name brand is almost a nonissue.
#4
As long as the I beams in question are billets like Crower or Lunati to name a couple. IMO, the I beam design weight wise is stronger, that may be the reasoning behind all of these billet I beams that are out now.
#6
TECH Addict
I have found that all H-beam rods that I have seen weights posted for are lighter than I-beam rods that I have seen weights posted for. It appears that for a given strength the H-beams are lighter. Can someone else verify this ??
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
Originally Posted by Hysteria
The Eagle H beams are around 660 grams and the Lunati Billet i beams are around 670 grams. The Eagles can hold around 750 CHP and the Lunati's an hold around 1100.
I should have clarified a little better though. Of rods that are made by the same manufacturer, out of the same material, rated for the same hp, the H-beam rods seem to be lighter There .... that's better
#9
Sorry about that. I was trying to do a same name company comparison but all I have is Eagle and Lunati books near by and Eagle doesnt make any billets and Lunati doesnt make any H beams lol. I thought it would be a good comparison nontheless because of the popularity of both rods. Also most people think of Eagle or simular type rod(Manley, Scat, Cat) when thinking H beam and Lunati is a pretty popular billet rod. The Eagles are 4340 and the Lunati's are 4340 according to their books.