Crane 1.8's causing float at 5,200? Look at Dyno sheet
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Crane 1.8's causing float at 5,200? Look at Dyno sheet
Any idea on what's going on here? The car seems to have steady power now..but less of it after the install of Crane 1.8's, Crane springs, Titanium retainers. Has LT's and true duals, everything else stock.
#3
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Quiet Place in the Country, FL
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd recommend checking your lifter preload. The rockers themselves are not going to cause valve float. I suspect that you don't have enough preload. Those rockers have instructions on preload adjustment that should result in 1 3/4 to 2 turns of lifter preload. Did you buy the entire rocker kit with the 7.250" pushrods? If you try to run the stock 7.400" pushrods, the rocker geometry will be all screwed up and they won't have the proper lift rate. Also, been my experience the LT's necessitate some tuning due to o2 sensor placement! Hope this helps!!
#4
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by QuietTahoe
I'd recommend checking your lifter preload. The rockers themselves are not going to cause valve float. I suspect that you don't have enough preload. Those rockers have instructions on preload adjustment that should result in 1 3/4 to 2 turns of lifter preload. Did you buy the entire rocker kit with the 7.250" pushrods? If you try to run the stock 7.400" pushrods, the rocker geometry will be all screwed up and they won't have the proper lift rate. Also, been my experience the LT's necessitate some tuning due to o2 sensor placement! Hope this helps!!
#5
TECH Resident
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree.
A higher rocker ratio ramps the valve faster making the effective mass of
the valve heavier due to velocity.
Pre-load isn't going to cause float. RPM, valve spring pressures, valve train mass
are more to blame.
A higher rocker ratio ramps the valve faster making the effective mass of
the valve heavier due to velocity.
Pre-load isn't going to cause float. RPM, valve spring pressures, valve train mass
are more to blame.
#6
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adrenaline_Z
I disagree.
A higher rocker ratio ramps the valve faster making the effective mass of
the valve heavier due to velocity.
Pre-load isn't going to cause float. RPM, valve spring pressures, valve train mass
are more to blame.
A higher rocker ratio ramps the valve faster making the effective mass of
the valve heavier due to velocity.
Pre-load isn't going to cause float. RPM, valve spring pressures, valve train mass
are more to blame.
#7
TECH Resident
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Incorrect Pre-load will cause power loss if that's what you mean.
I wouldn't attribute valve float to incorrect pre-load...I would attribute
power loss to incorrect pre-load.
Who installed the camshaft and set the lash/pre-load? DId you change springs,
or shim the current springs to get correct open and seat pressures for the
new 1.8 ratio rockers?
I wouldn't attribute valve float to incorrect pre-load...I would attribute
power loss to incorrect pre-load.
Who installed the camshaft and set the lash/pre-load? DId you change springs,
or shim the current springs to get correct open and seat pressures for the
new 1.8 ratio rockers?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adrenaline_Z
Incorrect Pre-load will cause power loss if that's what you mean.
I wouldn't attribute valve float to incorrect pre-load...I would attribute
power loss to incorrect pre-load.
Who installed the camshaft and set the lash/pre-load? DId you change springs,
or shim the current springs to get correct open and seat pressures for the
new 1.8 ratio rockers?
I wouldn't attribute valve float to incorrect pre-load...I would attribute
power loss to incorrect pre-load.
Who installed the camshaft and set the lash/pre-load? DId you change springs,
or shim the current springs to get correct open and seat pressures for the
new 1.8 ratio rockers?
Everyone, thanks for you help on this, I really mean that.
Here is the car:
http://www.ls1.com/forums/showthread.php?t=542932
#9
On The Tree
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Quiet Place in the Country, FL
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Adrenaline_Z
Incorrect Pre-load will cause power loss if that's what you mean.
I wouldn't attribute valve float to incorrect pre-load...I would attribute
power loss to incorrect pre-load.
Who installed the camshaft and set the lash/pre-load? DId you change springs,
or shim the current springs to get correct open and seat pressures for the
new 1.8 ratio rockers?
I wouldn't attribute valve float to incorrect pre-load...I would attribute
power loss to incorrect pre-load.
Who installed the camshaft and set the lash/pre-load? DId you change springs,
or shim the current springs to get correct open and seat pressures for the
new 1.8 ratio rockers?
#10
TECH Resident
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: K-W, Ontario
Posts: 845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When the pushrod flexes, it reduces the overall length. THe lifter compensates to take up slack.
This would happen after the lobe peak.
During the ramp up, the slack is taken up by the load of the spring.
Unless there is an oscillation during valve closing, there should be no pump-up
event. That would lead to spring pressure issues again.
If the springs are weak, at fast RPM, the valve jumps off the peak of the
cam lobe. This is normally when the pump-up occurs (weak open pressure).
This would happen after the lobe peak.
During the ramp up, the slack is taken up by the load of the spring.
Unless there is an oscillation during valve closing, there should be no pump-up
event. That would lead to spring pressure issues again.
If the springs are weak, at fast RPM, the valve jumps off the peak of the
cam lobe. This is normally when the pump-up occurs (weak open pressure).
#12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vettenuts
Do you have a dyno of before the rocker installation? I am curious about your exhaust system. How well do those BMW mufflers flow? Guess I am just wondering if there is more than the rockers that might be an issue.
No Dyno before.
#13
On The Tree
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cleveland, TN
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am by no means an expert..but i'll throw this sudgestion out there.
Fuel pump. MY dyno sheet drops at about 5200 when the pump gives up.
Just throwing out ideas =)
Fuel pump. MY dyno sheet drops at about 5200 when the pump gives up.
Just throwing out ideas =)
#14
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
If you know the Crane installation was the cause of this problem, I would opt for a re-adjustment of the rockers. You have the recommended springs, rockers and push rods so this seems like a logical way to proceed unless you have other suspicions on the car. How is the fuel filter?
#16
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have it going in the shop Friday to change out to a SLP LS6 intake and politely talk the shop into relooking at the valve train adjustments at that time.
Let you all know next thursday when I am back in town and pick up the car.
Let you all know next thursday when I am back in town and pick up the car.
#18
I'm running the Crane 1.79 accelerated lift rockers with my set-up and they work perfectly up through 6800 rpms...So, unless they didn't get the preload set properly, I would not blame the rockers...
I measured each rocker preload as I went through the 8 hour procedure and ended up with approx. 0.090" of preload after completing the procedure...
And, as was mentioned earlier...Are you on the stock tune still...With the LT Headers and the higher lift rockers, your A/F ratio may be way off and that power drop may be a combination of KR, timing and A/F being off for your set-up...
Peace...Gman
I measured each rocker preload as I went through the 8 hour procedure and ended up with approx. 0.090" of preload after completing the procedure...
And, as was mentioned earlier...Are you on the stock tune still...With the LT Headers and the higher lift rockers, your A/F ratio may be way off and that power drop may be a combination of KR, timing and A/F being off for your set-up...
Peace...Gman
#19
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the rockers aren't wrong for his setup. i have the same vinci/crane dual springs, titanium retainers, pushrods, and 1.8 accelerated lift rockers with the stock cam as well.
here's my before and after dyno. it's not valve float, too much spring pressure, or rockers too heavy. it's just plain stock cam petering out.
and the wife's car made more power before the rockers that his did after he put the rockers, LTs and dual exhaust. at the time the wife's dynos was run, all it had was lid, filter, MAF ends, bassani 1 3/4 optimum length headers, hi flow cats and borla 3" catback and on stock tune. and to boot, her's is an auto with stock converter. so, it should be lower than his. seeing that his is a manual. her car also has about double his miles 60K at that time.
so. i'd say he needs to look elsewhere.
here's my before and after dyno. it's not valve float, too much spring pressure, or rockers too heavy. it's just plain stock cam petering out.
and the wife's car made more power before the rockers that his did after he put the rockers, LTs and dual exhaust. at the time the wife's dynos was run, all it had was lid, filter, MAF ends, bassani 1 3/4 optimum length headers, hi flow cats and borla 3" catback and on stock tune. and to boot, her's is an auto with stock converter. so, it should be lower than his. seeing that his is a manual. her car also has about double his miles 60K at that time.
so. i'd say he needs to look elsewhere.