Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

What can I expect power wise just changing to a 383 stroker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-17-2005, 03:28 PM
  #1  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default What can I expect power wise just changing to a 383 stroker?

Here's my dyno graph... blue = current s2 heads, TR224 cam, MAC headers with a crappy y-pipe.


So my question is this.... if I kept my same top end package, I'm adding QTP race headers and y-pipe, what type of numbers would I get with a 383 4.0" stroker setup?

I know its not going to be a maximized drag setup, but what I'm looking for is 400 ft/lb of torque at 3000 - 3500 rpm and topping out the torque at 450 ft/lb by 5000 rpm.

I'm not really concerned about how my hp it will make since I would rather drive and shift the car in the sub 4000 rpm range and I'm looking for more usable torque on a respectable budget.

Thanks.
Old 07-17-2005, 04:38 PM
  #2  
11 Second Club
 
XTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: NE PA
Posts: 1,320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm not really sure, but with the extra cubes you should definitely move up a few notches with your cam. Because of the larger displacement, you'll be able to do this with no effect on driveability or idle quality.
Old 07-17-2005, 05:14 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
 
KCFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: SoCal
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
LS1Tech 20 Year Member
Default

Xtrooper is right. You can go bigger with the cam and not mess with driveability. The extra cubes really need more cam to get the same VE in a larger motor. But just as a rule of thumb bottom end makes TQ and top end makes HP.
Old 07-18-2005, 06:31 AM
  #4  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
Thread Starter
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I totally understand that I would need to go with a larger cam, and I also know that horsepower is simply a mathematical derivative of torque at a specific rpm.

The reason I posted my question the way I did, was that most people will post that a 382 all bore will make more horsepower than a stroker will, but that's not what I'm interested in.

I have no interest in shifting this thing at 7000 rpm or to run a cam as big as my thigh. If I went with a larger cam, it would stay around a .560 - .570 lift so I wouldn't have to worry about springs or valvetrain problems.

Thanks guys.
Old 07-18-2005, 07:17 AM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (4)
 
Wet 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always figure adding 1 ci will add about 1 hp/tq...




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.