Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

402 LS1 & AFR 205 ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-04-2005, 09:29 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
402LS1TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 402 Ls1 & Afr 205 ?

I am ordering a 402 from SDPC tomorrow. SDPC says the deck height on this motor is Zero. I've also got a set of AFR 205 66cc heads to work with. According to the RSR compression calculator, with a .040 head gasket my static compression ratio works out to 10.3 to 1. If I were to have the heads milled .024" to 62cc chambers, the ratio would become 10.8 to 1. Which I like better. I've got my eye on a 238/244 .605/.612 114lsa cam.

So two questions follow.

1) Would the milling cause issues with piston / valve clearance? (aka would flycutting be necessary?)

2) Any idea what the gain of .5 compression points would net in HP?

I'm trying to figure out if it's really worth it. I definitely do NOT want to have to flycut the pistons at all.

Last edited by 402LS1TA; 10-05-2005 at 08:40 AM.
Old 10-11-2005, 07:57 AM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
02sierraz71_5.3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Cornelius, NC
Posts: 3,473
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 402LS1TA
I am ordering a 402 from SDPC tomorrow. SDPC says the deck height on this motor is Zero. I've also got a set of AFR 205 66cc heads to work with. According to the RSR compression calculator, with a .040 head gasket my static compression ratio works out to 10.3 to 1. If I were to have the heads milled .024" to 62cc chambers, the ratio would become 10.8 to 1. Which I like better. I've got my eye on a 238/244 .605/.612 114lsa cam.

So two questions follow.

1) Would the milling cause issues with piston / valve clearance? (aka would flycutting be necessary?)

2) Any idea what the gain of .5 compression points would net in HP?

I'm trying to figure out if it's really worth it. I definitely do NOT want to have to flycut the pistons at all.
1) clay the comb chamer to check p/v You could also call afr I think theyre valve angle is small shouldnt be an issue

2) I would guess maybe 5-10 rw

3)how about a slimmer gasket to up compression cheaply?
Old 10-11-2005, 09:15 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (19)
 
Bryan @ Speed Inc.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: chitown
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

if the pistons have valve reliefs in them, then that cam shouldn't be too big... especially since the duration is relatively mild and it's on a 114 lsa. but leaving the heads the way they are will keep the valves that much further from the piston.... keep that in mind. i'd stick w/ the 10.3 cr. it will make great power. if you wanted to up the cr from 10.3 then i'd do over 11:1 to make any real difference in power. but i'd stick w/ the 10.3. my .02
Old 10-11-2005, 09:56 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

What is the size of your valve reliefs?




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.