Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1.6 rocker arms??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-2006, 06:10 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
LS69TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texarkana, Tx
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default 1.6 rocker arms??

Ok. So I was bored at work and wondering if anyone made 1.6 rockers for the LS1s. I was thinking that if anyone made these, you could swap them on the car for regular daily driving and make the springs live longer. Then on the weekend or when you go to the track, put the 1.7s back on. Sound stupid to anyone?
Old 01-26-2006, 06:25 PM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (33)
 
Nasty N8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have seen them made for special applications. There was just no advantage to them.

Nate
Old 01-26-2006, 07:56 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
MadBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

There are "break-in" rockers available in some brands with 1.4.and maybe 1.3:1 ratios. I've even heard of engines that ran worse after putting the regular ones back in the exhaust, so the racer stuck with the low lift parts...
Old 01-26-2006, 08:12 PM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
redtail2426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Rochester,Ny
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

what you could do is get a cam designed around 1.8 rockers and then run the stock 1.7's for better spring life and weekends.
Old 01-26-2006, 10:14 PM
  #5  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
LS69TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Texarkana, Tx
Posts: 4,391
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yea. Didn't think about that. I was just thinking that you could have like a .600 lift cam and swap some 1.6's on it and have a decent ~.560 lift for normal driving and whatnot .
Old 01-26-2006, 10:44 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I would just run a cam on high lift XE lobes, most of thoes are around .570-.585 and make decent power.
Old 01-27-2006, 12:05 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
Beast96Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The thing is, is that it isn't as much the lift as it is the harshness of the lobe that wears on springs. If you lower the lift and still have a XE-R lobe, it's still gunna wear out. I would say that lift is miniscule in determining wear, unless your pushing your springs to coil bind every time.
Old 01-27-2006, 01:01 PM
  #8  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Chris 96 WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Beast96Z
The thing is, is that it isn't as much the lift as it is the harshness of the lobe that wears on springs. If you lower the lift and still have a XE-R lobe, it's still gunna wear out. I would say that lift is miniscule in determining wear, unless your pushing your springs to coil bind every time.
Agreed. Its how fast the valve opens that's really hard on the springs. A lazy ramp rate and high lift is much easier on springs than an aggresive ramp and the same lift.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:33 PM.