Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Custom cam ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2007, 12:10 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
MAX12421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Custom cam ?

My friend and I have been talking about cams the last week and I've decided to do just a cam and then the heads this next winter but.... I have a 2000 z28 with QTP headers and 3.73 gears... my friend has a 2002 firehawk with heads and cam, but he wishes that he would have went bigger. So he suggested a 242/246 590/595 on a 112 with +4.. I just wanted to know what someone elses opinion was, and it is not my daily driver also...
One question I have will I have valve clearance?
thanks
Old 02-25-2007, 03:41 PM
  #2  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by MAX12421
My friend and I have been talking about cams the last week and I've decided to do just a cam and then the heads this next winter but.... I have a 2000 z28 with QTP headers and 3.73 gears... my friend has a 2002 firehawk with heads and cam, but he wishes that he would have went bigger. So he suggested a 242/246 590/595 on a 112 with +4.. I just wanted to know what someone elses opinion was, and it is not my daily driver also...
One question I have will I have valve clearance?
thanks
the cam you guys are talking about is too big, for what you want to do. look into the 230's for duration figures @.050.
Old 02-25-2007, 04:46 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What are you trying to do with your cam? Just arbitrarily picking durations isn't exactly the best method to pick a cam. Consider that similar durations are being used in the cam only record holder, a purpose built 3000 lb race car using 4.56 gears. I would be brutally honest with yourself about what you intend to do and see what others are using to accomplish the same goals.
Old 02-25-2007, 10:01 PM
  #4  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
MAX12421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well the car will be used to cruise and take to the track, I estimate maybe about 3000 miles a year on it and that is at the very most... okay guys my first choice was the Texas speed cam that is 233/239 595/603 at a 112, but the XE-R lobes are kind of turning me off to get it
Old 02-26-2007, 05:59 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Why would you say that?
Old 02-26-2007, 06:22 AM
  #6  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
slow trap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: tennessee
Posts: 2,639
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

a set of patriot golds or any decent spring should last quite a while even on xer lobes.something like a t2 which is a 232/234 on xer lobes would be a decent cam i would run,or if you want to trade some tq for hp get something like an ms3.
Old 02-26-2007, 07:53 AM
  #7  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
teke184's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Key West, Florida
Posts: 3,183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

do you have a hp goal or maybe a track goal...

but any of the mid 23x cams are great cams...and they all respond well to good heads.

if you really want good power...don't skimp on the heads. there can be a huge difference between budget and well built heads. that can easily make up for going with a slightly smaller cam
Old 02-26-2007, 10:21 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
YellowToy/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northern WV just south of MD
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

If u dont have valve cuts in your pistons be carfull how big you go. If you mill for more compression it gets tight fast. All ways bad when mr piston meets mr valve
Old 02-26-2007, 03:56 PM
  #9  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
MAX12421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Why would you say that?
I've read that the springs need to be replaced more often then others
Old 02-26-2007, 04:06 PM
  #10  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
MAX12421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by teke184
do you have a hp goal or maybe a track goal...

but any of the mid 23x cams are great cams...and they all respond well to good heads.

if you really want good power...don't skimp on the heads. there can be a huge difference between budget and well built heads. that can easily make up for going with a slightly smaller cam
My goals at the track (Utah which is about 4300 feet) high 11's low 12's (after heads) so I wanted to stay in the 23x region so as far as I know the better it breaths the more I'll put down.. and power I'm not really going to get hung up on..

Last edited by MAX12421; 02-26-2007 at 04:47 PM.
Old 02-26-2007, 06:59 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

The altitude is what is going to hurt you. A 12.00 @ 113 at 4300 feet is basically an 11.00 @ 124 at sea level. Here's a mod list from the last 10 sec club entry:

1998 camaro Z28 A3 347/ Trex / FTRA/LS6/SLP lid/SLP MAF/bellows/ported -tb/ asp pulley/slp- headers/x-pipe-1 chambers/th350,4000 stall/BMR subframes/lca's/torque arm/ tuned/tnt 150 shot/3:23/ mt Drags/ 1.59 60' 10.94 best mph 125.89

Since it took a 150 shot to get there, I'm guessing that pass is at full weight.

I'm guessing that I'll have to backpedal a little on my previous statement. It probably will take a serious effort to reach your goal at your altitude.
Old 02-26-2007, 11:26 PM
  #12  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
MAX12421's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hammertime
The altitude is what is going to hurt you. A 12.00 @ 113 at 4300 feet is basically an 11.00 @ 124 at sea level. Here's a mod list from the last 10 sec club entry:

1998 camaro Z28 A3 347/ Trex / FTRA/LS6/SLP lid/SLP MAF/bellows/ported -tb/ asp pulley/slp- headers/x-pipe-1 chambers/th350,4000 stall/BMR subframes/lca's/torque arm/ tuned/tnt 150 shot/3:23/ mt Drags/ 1.59 60' 10.94 best mph 125.89

Since it took a 150 shot to get there, I'm guessing that pass is at full weight.

I'm guessing that I'll have to backpedal a little on my previous statement. It probably will take a serious effort to reach your goal at your altitude.
Thats what I figured and I want to do it without any power adders too.. Hey thanks for the info guys
Old 02-27-2007, 08:14 AM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hammertime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Smithton, IL
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I'd say start with your suspension. Its going to take enough power that you simply have to hook to even come reasonably close. Once you get the chassis sorted out, focus on getting your car to run good numbers with stock internals. Use your mph as a good indicator of the power you are producing to see where you'll have to be (how much more HP) to hit your target mph.

IMO, you are better off with excellent heads and a little less cam. Even if you are olny putting 3000 street miles a year on it, they'll be easier without a monster.

Also, if you haven't already, consider shedding some weight.

Good Luck!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 PM.