Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Shorter Runners for FAST Intake!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-26-2016, 03:35 PM
  #81  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
miami993c297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
That's not 100% true. Most of the fastest all motor cars have a 4" crank or larger and they spin 9k+. The destroked engines are usually restricted to a cubic inch limit.

Make sense in drag racing, road course is another story.


Christian
Old 05-26-2016, 03:44 PM
  #82  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
miami993c297's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: West Palm Beach fl usa
Posts: 934
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KCS
That's not 100% true. Most of the fastest all motor cars have a 4" crank or larger and they spin 9k+. The destroked engines are usually restricted to a cubic inch limit.
Now KCS, if you are telling me you build engines 6.0 liters V8 revving to 9500rpm on a 4" stroke...that is nonsense.


Christian
Old 05-26-2016, 04:12 PM
  #83  
The Scammer Hammer
iTrader: (49)
 
dr_whigham's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lafayette, LA
Posts: 6,707
Received 20 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

You of all people should know what you can spin aluminum rods to, Christian... If the crank is perfection then I'd say even 12k is a reality. It's all in the valvetrain... Or an OHC head that's 100% custom...

Anyway, I think it's a typo and it should say 7.0
Old 05-26-2016, 04:55 PM
  #84  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by miami993c297
Now KCS, if you are telling me you build engines 6.0 liters V8 revving to 9500rpm on a 4" stroke...that is nonsense.


Christian
Uh, no. That's not at all what I said.
Old 05-26-2016, 10:19 PM
  #85  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hardcoresoldier
The article also says it is a 6.0 LS7 yet the article also says the new runners are exclusively for square port heads....
In the video it's stated as a 6.0 LS3.



I'm gonna bet the video is correct.

KW

Last edited by KW Baraka; 05-26-2016 at 10:32 PM.
Old 05-27-2016, 06:44 AM
  #86  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

Until I see all three runners, on the same setup, it's pointless.... and I doubt they are going to show all three because it would be pretty obvious to people the amount you lose down low, compared to the amount gained up top... if they did that, they wouldn't sell many of these new runners that they spent plenty of r&d and production costs on.

Buyer beware.
Old 05-27-2016, 06:46 AM
  #87  
UNDER PRESSURE MOD
iTrader: (19)
 
The Alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Doylestown PA
Posts: 10,813
Received 13 Likes on 10 Posts

Default

I'm not saying they don't serve a purpose, because they do for those people only interested in racing where rpms don't drop below a certain rpm ever, like drag racing where you launch at x,xxx rpm, and during the shifts, it never drops below that point, but for the vast majority of people, even road racers, we don't live above those rpms.
Old 05-27-2016, 08:39 AM
  #88  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (7)
 
KW Baraka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: S.A., TX
Posts: 2,180
Received 130 Likes on 99 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by The Alchemist
Until I see all three runners, on the same setup, it's pointless.... and I doubt they are going to show all three because it would be pretty obvious to people the amount you lose down low, compared to the amount gained up top......
The only 'rub' I have is just how much would be lost below 3500 RPMs with the High-HP runners versus the Standard Length runners.

Still.....I got 3.70 gears on my A6 'SS'......so that's really just a minor concern.

The longer it takes Vararam to come out with their intake, the more likely I am to go with the FAST runners.

KW
Old 05-27-2016, 12:58 PM
  #89  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Really sucks they're not doing anything for us cathedral guys or ls7 for that matter...
Old 05-29-2016, 11:13 AM
  #90  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KW Baraka
The only 'rub' I have is just how much would be lost below 3500 RPMs with the High-HP runners versus the Standard Length runners.

Still.....I got 3.70 gears on my A6 'SS'......so that's really just a minor concern.

The longer it takes Vararam to come out with their intake, the more likely I am to go with the FAST runners.

KW
I would take a 20hp gain from 4k up vs a 30hp lose below 3500
Originally Posted by blk00ss
Really sucks they're not doing anything for us cathedral guys or ls7 for that matter...
True....not like it matters to me at all. Cathedral stuff gets no love anymore. But the msd seems very promising for the ls7.
Old 05-29-2016, 12:14 PM
  #91  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HioSSilver
I would take a 20hp gain from 4k up vs a 30hp lose below 3500
I doubt that's where the shift in power would be.

Looking at the graph between the high hp & race runners. I would think the standard runners would make more power, than the high hp, everywhere up to around 6000-6500rpm maybe.
Old 05-29-2016, 01:14 PM
  #92  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Hardcoresoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: De Pere, WI
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well, the LS3 guys NEED a manifold alternative to the OEM manifold. The only real alternative is a Super Vic as the regular FAST 102 is not an upgrade.
Old 05-29-2016, 01:16 PM
  #93  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Hardcoresoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: De Pere, WI
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by SoFla01SSLookinstok
I doubt that's where the shift in power would be.

Looking at the graph between the high hp & race runners. I would think the standard runners would make more power, than the high hp, everywhere up to around 6000-6500rpm maybe.
but the standard runners start to die off at 6000 and are done by 6200ish. Many of us want to spin to 7000 - 7500 which only leaves us with a Super Vic as an option. I'm not really concerned with power below 3500 as I will seldom see that in a race. I very much care about performance 5500 - 7500.
Old 05-29-2016, 01:46 PM
  #94  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (66)
 
blk00ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Jasper, AL
Posts: 2,366
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hardcoresoldier
but the standard runners start to die off at 6000 and are done by 6200ish. Many of us want to spin to 7000 - 7500 which only leaves us with a Super Vic as an option. I'm not really concerned with power below 3500 as I will seldom see that in a race. I very much care about performance 5500 - 7500.
This here.
Old 05-29-2016, 05:03 PM
  #95  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hardcoresoldier
but the standard runners start to die off at 6000 and are done by 6200ish. Many of us want to spin to 7000 - 7500 which only leaves us with a Super Vic as an option. I'm not really concerned with power below 3500 as I will seldom see that in a race. I very much care about performance 5500 - 7500.
Unless you can fit a Holley Hi-Ram.
Old 05-29-2016, 05:23 PM
  #96  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Hardcoresoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: De Pere, WI
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

the problem with that is nobody is running a high ram NA on a LS3. much less any comparisons of the LS3 high ram vs OEM LS3 intake.
Old 05-29-2016, 08:51 PM
  #97  
Launching!
 
David_viny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Maine
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't know if this has been linked yet but here is a vid of some testing:


Edit 10/08/16: Not my vid, just something I found.

Last edited by David_viny; 10-08-2016 at 10:01 PM.
Old 05-29-2016, 09:20 PM
  #98  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
Hardcoresoldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: De Pere, WI
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I really wanna see what the mid length runners do out to 7500 now....
Old 05-30-2016, 07:56 AM
  #99  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Hardcoresoldier
the problem with that is nobody is running a high ram NA on a LS3. much less any comparisons of the LS3 high ram vs OEM LS3 intake.
Ahem...

Tested Holley Hi-Ram LS3 intake vs Stock LS3, 45 rwhp gain on stock LS3 heads
Old 05-30-2016, 01:43 PM
  #100  
11 Second Club
 
SoFla01SSLookinstok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,541
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Great video! It is all about the combo. As my motors power range is around 4500-6500rpm I would choose the longest runners. I don't think the bit of power up top, from the mid runners, would justify the losses through the band.

It's really awesome how you can tune the intake to the combo.


Quick Reply: Shorter Runners for FAST Intake!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.