Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

benifit of 6.2 over 6.0 both 06-08 engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2010, 01:31 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (34)
 
bigfatls6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 899
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default benifit of 6.2 over 6.0 both 06-08 engines

I'm buying an engine to swap into a coupe mustang I can get either a 06-07 6.0 out of a truck or a 6.2 out of an escalade. I know the 6.2 is an aluminum block but do both have same heads and intake or no? The price difference between the 2 is like $2100 the 6.2 being more. The weight difference in the block doesn't matter to me. What heds come on a 2006 or 2007 6.0 out of a truck?
Old 02-05-2010, 02:53 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
t/a98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greenvile, sc
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

a search will do wonders, with your post count im suprised that wasnt the first thing you did...

6.2 is an l92 which is easily converted to ls3, just take off dod/afm and the vvt. the ls3 has much better heads than the 6.0...
Old 02-05-2010, 03:19 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
dkota1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

On the 6.0 it depends which one, there is lq4(325hp) and lq9(345hp) for the trucks. On the 6.2 there is a lil over 400hp. 6.2 has the "l92 heads" which are rectangular port heads that flow more than the 6.0 317 casting heads that are cathedral port. I believe the l92 is set up for vvt which may affect what you can use for pcm and tuning. What do you plan on doing with the motor, N/A, forced induction, nitrous? Were you looking to buy used or new? If your going for new id look at the lsx376 crate motor especially if your dropping it in a fox body and have to buy all the supporting parts anyways to run it. Or just look at the for sale section and get a good price on a used one. Good luck hope this helps.
Old 02-05-2010, 03:32 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Redcorvette2000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: rock hill, sc
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have an ls3 and it seems to me there is a lot cooler **** out there for the ls2....such as TRICK FLOW cylinder heads...
Old 02-05-2010, 04:23 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
flatchat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would get the 6.0 and spend the extra $2100 on making more power!!!!
Old 02-05-2010, 05:13 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

2006 6.0 still lq4
2007 6.0 is ly6, comes with l92 rectangle port heads, same as ls3,l92
2007+ iron block l92 heads ly6 is best bang for the buck.
but lq4 usually priced way lower.
Old 02-05-2010, 05:18 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,888
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by t/a98
a search will do wonders, with your post count im suprised that wasnt the first thing you did...

6.2 is an l92 which is easily converted to ls3, just take off dod/afm and the vvt. the ls3 has much better heads than the 6.0...
just diff. valves. not necessarily better
Old 02-05-2010, 05:51 PM
  #8  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
danf1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just shows that the grass is always greener................









ls3 owners should not feel slighted in the least. the additional bore has a secondary effect in that it unshrouds the valves for better flow.

ls3 heads are cantankerous with respect to cam selection, but offer some of the same flow of the best from the cathedral world.

loved the ls3 that I dismantled an l76 with a ls2 bottom end and replaced it with an ls3 bottom end in a pontiac g8 with 4000 miles. anyone need a ls2 shortblock???? (acronyms, confused yet?)


oh, and i stroked the ls3................
Old 02-08-2010, 09:47 PM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (6)
 
t/a98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: greenvile, sc
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by NemeSS
just diff. valves. not necessarily better

ls3 head is an entirely different casting than a ls2... ls3 has rectangular ports and the ls2 is a cathedral port like a ls1.....

edit: didnt realize he was looking at a l76 ly6 engine, should have read better, but the older 6.0 vs. a 6.2 is no question imo
Old 02-09-2010, 08:50 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Silver408z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

People like to talk about about how great l92 and square port heads are. Yes they have great flow numbers, yes they make good power, but they are not just out shining cathedral port heads. There plenty of cars out there making great power and running awesome times with cathedral port heads.
Old 02-15-2010, 07:11 AM
  #11  
11 Second Club
 
SS Enforcer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Silver408z
People like to talk about about how great l92 and square port heads are. Yes they have great flow numbers, yes they make good power, but they are not just out shining cathedral port heads. There plenty of cars out there making great power and running awesome times with cathedral port heads.
When your talking bang for buck the square port heads are very hard to beat though.

cheers



Quick Reply: benifit of 6.2 over 6.0 both 06-08 engines



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:16 PM.