how much cubic inch can you get out of a 6.0?
#42
#46
#48
FormerVendor
The 408 is easy and super versatile with a ton of piston choices so that's the one we do 90% of the time.
#49
Sorry, don't mean to hijack your thread. I have a question that is kind of in line with yours...
What kind of numbers could I expect out of a 418 - 4.030 bore and 4.100 stroke? I know HCI can make or break the numbers, but...
I'm looking at this kit from Eagle:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ESP-B12824030/
also, would it be safe to spin this motor at ~7000 rpms? 800 hp/tq? ~16:1 compression? Fuel is no big deal, I can run % nitro if need be....But right now I'm shooting for E85.
I'm really stuck between building an LS motor or going BBC and big cubes. I know I can get big cubes/hp/tq out of a ~572. But I'm weighing in the LS possibilty.... I like that they are lighter and etc.
What kind of numbers could I expect out of a 418 - 4.030 bore and 4.100 stroke? I know HCI can make or break the numbers, but...
I'm looking at this kit from Eagle:
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ESP-B12824030/
also, would it be safe to spin this motor at ~7000 rpms? 800 hp/tq? ~16:1 compression? Fuel is no big deal, I can run % nitro if need be....But right now I'm shooting for E85.
I'm really stuck between building an LS motor or going BBC and big cubes. I know I can get big cubes/hp/tq out of a ~572. But I'm weighing in the LS possibilty.... I like that they are lighter and etc.
#51
As of right now, I'm thinking that I need at least 800 hp/tq at ~6-7000 rpm, without power adders. If that's not very doable, then I have my answer.
#52
FormerVendor
A solid roller 408 can make 800 hp with good parts and race gas easy enough as well but it will be at higher rpm and will probably not last as long.
#53
Banned
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Inside Your Girlfriend
Posts: 1,120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The setup that I may be having you build will be a LQx with a 4.125 crank and 6.125 rods; as for the pistons, I currently have Wiseco .005 so I'm looking at a 415, but may go with a .05 for a 425, but not sure yet.
Anyways, would I be able to us a little juice, say 175 shot, with such a short skirt?
DM
#55
FormerVendor
Hey Erik,
The setup that I may be having you build will be a LQx with a 4.125 crank and 6.125 rods; as for the pistons, I currently have Wiseco .005 so I'm looking at a 415, but may go with a .05 for a 425, but not sure yet.
Anyways, would I be able to us a little juice, say 175 shot, with such a short skirt?
DM
The setup that I may be having you build will be a LQx with a 4.125 crank and 6.125 rods; as for the pistons, I currently have Wiseco .005 so I'm looking at a 415, but may go with a .05 for a 425, but not sure yet.
Anyways, would I be able to us a little juice, say 175 shot, with such a short skirt?
DM
#56
TECH Regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Has any one bored the lq4 or lq9 to 4.0845" and beenused with no problem?
From what i understand, that 0.18" wall thickness is good for NA.
Can any confirm
From what i understand, that 0.18" wall thickness is good for NA.
Can any confirm
#58
TECH Regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I done some simple math:
the water jacket will be exposed at 4.275" bore, thus lets assume that the boundary limit for the water jacket (W.J.) is 4.275". To calculate the remaining thickness with 4.000" bore:
-W.J..: 4.275"
-6.0 Block OME Bore: 4.000"
Thus avilabe thickness: ((4.275" - 4.000") / 2) = (0.275" / 2) = 0.1375" = 3.4925mm
If we bore the cylinder block to 4.060", the remaining thickness would be:
((4.275" - 4.060") / 2) = (0.215" / 2) = 0.1075" = 2.7305mm
If we bore the cylinder block to 4.085", the remaining thickness would be:
((4.275" - 4.085") / 2) = (0.19" / 2) = 0.095" = 2.413mm
The remaining thickness is almost 2.4 that I assume can handel the N/A engine
Thanks...
the water jacket will be exposed at 4.275" bore, thus lets assume that the boundary limit for the water jacket (W.J.) is 4.275". To calculate the remaining thickness with 4.000" bore:
-W.J..: 4.275"
-6.0 Block OME Bore: 4.000"
Thus avilabe thickness: ((4.275" - 4.000") / 2) = (0.275" / 2) = 0.1375" = 3.4925mm
If we bore the cylinder block to 4.060", the remaining thickness would be:
((4.275" - 4.060") / 2) = (0.215" / 2) = 0.1075" = 2.7305mm
If we bore the cylinder block to 4.085", the remaining thickness would be:
((4.275" - 4.085") / 2) = (0.19" / 2) = 0.095" = 2.413mm
The remaining thickness is almost 2.4 that I assume can handel the N/A engine
Thanks...
Last edited by LS6; 05-21-2012 at 09:27 AM.
#60
TECH Regular
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Cherry Hill, New Jersey State
Posts: 486
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thus, from experence what is the nominal diameter that the water jacket wall won't be structurally stable to hold the water pressure and the combustion pressure?
In my opinion, i think 4.1 would be the maximum with condition:
-cooling water shall be always maintained.
-programming to be safe margine from the border limit of detonation.
-compression ratio shall not be more than 11.5:1.0.
-the engine shall be natural aspirated.
this is my opinion
In my opinion, i think 4.1 would be the maximum with condition:
-cooling water shall be always maintained.
-programming to be safe margine from the border limit of detonation.
-compression ratio shall not be more than 11.5:1.0.
-the engine shall be natural aspirated.
this is my opinion