Street Racing & Kill Stories Basic Technical Questions & Advice

07 350Z vs a4 z28

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-21-2011, 08:22 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Soroushz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking 07 350Z vs a4 z28

I'm bored so I'm going to post a very old racing story.

So one of my close friends had recently acquired a 2000 a4 z28, so naturally being a very competitive guy he wanted revenge on my 350Z after me putting a big hurting on his v6 camaro.

So as always I was game and we made a short trip down to mexico. His camaro just had basic boltons which were a lid, smooth bellow and exhaust, while my 350Z was bone stock and had an auto transmission. Both being competitive we raced about 8-10 times. From a 20 roll our cars were about dead even until 100mph, from a 40 roll I had him by about a fender till about 100mph. So we pull over and I tell my friend to lets take the race a bit higher as he kept letting off 100-105, so we start at another 40 roll and again I have him by about a fender until 100mph but then from 100-120 he comes back and puts about a fender on me and pulling away. SO in conclusion both cars were evenly matched and both ran a mid 13 second pass.

I don't want to turn this into a giant argument so let me say that I am aware of how much faster the camaro can be with mods convertor, gears, stall, cam etc. Also going to say that 07 350Zs are a good bit faster than 03-06 ones, and that I am a current Z06 owner so I am an unbiased party.
Old 10-22-2011, 05:52 AM
  #2  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (6)
 
baxsom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Rockledge FL
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

bone stock 350z in 2007 had 306hp and 268 torque on a roughly 3400lb curb weight. The 2000 camaro bone stock weighs the same with more hp and a hell of a lot more torque. By just comparing the numbers, he really should have walked you hard so especially with 2 more cylinders.
Old 10-22-2011, 09:30 AM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I agree man he should have walked you pretty easily seems like he may need to learn his drive a stock ls1 car should be able to edge out even a new 370z
Old 10-22-2011, 09:44 AM
  #4  
Teching In
 
85mustang351's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: manning sc
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nice runs OP but make sure to wear your goggles to shield you from the **** storm about to ensue. Camaro shoulda won but anything can happen on the street.
Old 10-22-2011, 10:37 AM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
I agree man he should have walked you pretty easily seems like he may need to learn his drive a stock ls1 car should be able to edge out even a new 370z
i agree, felt like he would have pulled on you especially since both cars are auto. but how hard is it to drive an auto in a roll race? foot to the floor=go
Old 10-22-2011, 11:00 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (5)
 
MR_M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Tahlequah, OK
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was the z28 a 2.73 or 3.23 car? I can see it making sense if it was a 2.73 car for sure. 07-08 hr z's are no slouch, and the 5 speed auto probably kept it in its powerband better.
Old 10-22-2011, 11:40 AM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Um, it's an a4 fbody. I could see this happening. They aren't exactly roll race material.
Old 10-22-2011, 12:34 PM
  #8  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Soroushz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the 07 350Zs put down close to 270whp so the ls1 does have the power advantage, but the Z is about 300 lbs lighter not to mention the 350Z does have a tiptronic auto transmission, as I mentioned before both cars did run mid 13 second passes at the track trapping roughly the same, but I do believe I got a better 60 ft.
Old 10-22-2011, 12:45 PM
  #9  
Staging Lane
 
Sticks n Stones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Snohomish, WA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Soroushz06
the 07 350Zs put down close to 270whp so the ls1 does have the power advantage, but the Z is about 300 lbs lighter not to mention the 350Z does have a tiptronic auto transmission, as I mentioned before both cars did run mid 13 second passes at the track trapping roughly the same, but I do believe I got a better 60 ft.
300lbs lighter my ***. LS1 fbodies normally weigh in the 3400-3500 range. Right where your car weighs in at.
Old 10-22-2011, 02:20 PM
  #10  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
GtoSpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can see this race happening as stated. The HR 350Zs run 13s at 105-106 just like some stock A4 LS1s, so from a roll it sounds right. I do think a dig run would be much more in favor of the LS1 here however. My wife drives an HR powered G35 sedan, just a hair heavier than the 350Z, but does have 3.73s and still only around 3400lbs.... and I absolutely train wrecked her with my current set-up from 40-100mph. I posted the vid in the other 350 thread.

OP, did he pre-select 2nd gear before running you, or did he wait for it to downshift itself? Not choosing the right gear ahead of time could easily cost him the race against such a close competitor.
Old 10-22-2011, 04:07 PM
  #11  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Soroushz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GtoSpd
I can see this race happening as stated. The HR 350Zs run 13s at 105-106 just like some stock A4 LS1s, so from a roll it sounds right. I do think a dig run would be much more in favor of the LS1 here however. My wife drives an HR powered G35 sedan, just a hair heavier than the 350Z, but does have 3.73s and still only around 3400lbs.... and I absolutely train wrecked her with my current set-up from 40-100mph. I posted the vid in the other 350 thread.

OP, did he pre-select 2nd gear before running you, or did he wait for it to downshift itself? Not choosing the right gear ahead of time could easily cost him the race against such a close competitor.
No he preselected so he would be in the right rpm. If it makes u guys feel better I ran another z28 in my Z this one being m6, shorty headers, cutouts, lid, and he got be by a good 2-3 cars from a roll.
Old 10-22-2011, 04:56 PM
  #12  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
GtoSpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Soroushz06
No he preselected so he would be in the right rpm. If it makes u guys feel better I ran another z28 in my Z this one being m6, shorty headers, cutouts, lid, and he got be by a good 2-3 cars from a roll.
Gotcha. Having an HR car myself, I believe you. I never ran my wife when mine was bone stock, but I'm pretty sure it would be somewhat close.

This is with her stock, getting the jump on the 2nd honk, and myself with my current mods. No idea what the G35 would run in the 1/4, but I'm guessing a 13.7-8 at 101ish. Your 350 should easily be a tenth or two quicker.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TE_vHzo_QeA
Old 10-22-2011, 05:07 PM
  #13  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

I agree with you guys as I said before. a4 fbodies with stock converter and 2.73 gears are turds from a roll.
Old 10-22-2011, 08:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I still wouldn't say it should have been close. If the dude hit his Camaro in a dead spot then I could see it but if he selected the gear manually or even let it downshift on its own under 40 with 2.73s it would have ended differently.

Even when my car had the stock 2.73s in it I never had an issue with those cars lol think about it the cars weigh the same but one has almost 100ftlbs more tq and 50 more hp. Thats more than enough to jvercome a slight geating fault.but anything can happen on the st.
Old 10-23-2011, 12:01 AM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
 
GXPPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: crossett, Arkansas
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
I agree man he should have walked you pretty easily seems like he may need to learn his drive a stock ls1 car should be able to edge out even a new 370z

13.2@107 stock in my 370z... sorry but quite a few ls1 on this board would have lost to my 370z stock for stock
Old 10-23-2011, 08:00 AM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

didnt i say should? that 107 trap is about what a stock m6 ls1 should run on average and from what ive seen is on the highish side for a 370z. I've seen a stock 3v mustang trap 105 which is faster than some stock ls1 cars does that mean they are normally faster?? Hell no
Old 10-23-2011, 09:53 AM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
GtoSpd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some of you need to get past this whole 350Z thing, especially the part about TQ. The 350s are geared aggressive and the HR 350s rev the hell out of that gearing. You can't just say, "oh, one has 50 less HP and 90lbs less tq, so its faster". It doesn't work that way. Its a fact that any HR 350Z is the LS1s race to lose, but can easily be in the 350s favor if the LS1 driver isn't the greatest. As far as the 370 goes, its a drivers race against a stock LS1, period. Hell, it better be for $40 grand and being 9 years newer. I've seen plenty of 370s run low 13s at 106-107.
Old 10-23-2011, 10:01 AM
  #18  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GtoSpd
Some of you need to get past this whole 350Z thing, especially the part about TQ. The 350s are geared aggressive and the HR 350s rev the hell out of that gearing. You can't just say, "oh, one has 50 less HP and 90lbs less tq, so its faster". It doesn't work that way. Its a fact that any HR 350Z is the LS1s race to lose, but can easily be in the 350s favor if the LS1 driver isn't the greatest. As far as the 370 goes, its a drivers race against a stock LS1, period. Hell, it better be for $40 grand and being 9 years newer. I've seen plenty of 370s run low 13s at 106-107.
Except the 370Z starts around $30k. Good runs OP.
Old 10-23-2011, 10:32 AM
  #19  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Soroushz06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GtoSpd
Some of you need to get past this whole 350Z thing, especially the part about TQ. The 350s are geared aggressive and the HR 350s rev the hell out of that gearing. You can't just say, "oh, one has 50 less HP and 90lbs less tq, so its faster". It doesn't work that way. Its a fact that any HR 350Z is the LS1s race to lose, but can easily be in the 350s favor if the LS1 driver isn't the greatest. As far as the 370 goes, its a drivers race against a stock LS1, period. Hell, it better be for $40 grand and being 9 years newer. I've seen plenty of 370s run low 13s at 106-107.
^ I agree it makes a big difference plus the 07 350Z only makes ten less HP than the 370Z and a bit more torque actually.



Quick Reply: 07 350Z vs a4 z28



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 AM.