Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Difference between 78 a body and 82 g body?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2011, 10:21 PM
  #1  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
futureuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Difference between 78 a body and 82 g body?

Other than a face lift in 82, is there a difference between an 81 a body and an 82 g body?
Old 12-02-2011, 12:36 AM
  #2  
sawzall wielding director
iTrader: (4)
 
G-Body's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Downers Grove, IL
Posts: 3,120
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

No not really. Small differences in appearance but the underpinnings are all the same. They switched to metric lugnut thread and the taper on the front spindle is different between the years but its only minor stuff that they changed.
Old 12-02-2011, 12:47 AM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

The A-body is bigger isnt it?
Old 12-02-2011, 08:09 PM
  #4  
jmd
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: T56th Street, Aridzona
Posts: 2,561
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Default

If you want to tell us how an 81 Monte is bigger than an 82 Monte, we're all ears.
Old 12-02-2011, 09:09 PM
  #5  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
futureuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Okay thanks for the info. So the big change to the a body was in 78 to the smaller body and then it was pretty much renamed to g body in 82.

Any guesses as to the lightest 78 or later a/g body?
Old 12-02-2011, 09:12 PM
  #6  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

He said 78 in the title..
Old 12-02-2011, 09:33 PM
  #7  
10 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
futureuser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by the_merv
He said 78 in the title..
Hence the purpose of the thread. It is confusing that GM completely redesigned the a body for 78 and renamed it g body in 82 after a facelift and minor changes. For the longest time, I thought a 78 malibu was a g body.
Old 12-02-2011, 09:50 PM
  #8  
Teching In
iTrader: (1)
 
ecna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hudson Valley NY
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The A-body was always GM's smaller mid-size car. When the new line of FWD cars (82 MY) came out... Celebrity, Ciera, Century etc. it was natural for GM to call that line A's as they were smaller and change the cars we were familiar with to a new line. It kept the A where it belonged.
Old 12-03-2011, 12:04 PM
  #9  
TECH Apprentice
 
GNCLONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by futureuser
....
Any guesses as to the lightest 78 or later a/g body?

I'm going to guess that a low-end El Camino without many power options is going to be lighter than a 2 door Malibu which I would guess is maybe the second lightest.

The problem with the Grand Prix/Regal/Cutlass is that they generally had more options and had more plush carpet, sound deadener etc. My Regal Limited had really thick, heavy carpet. More weight.

My Grand National clone is about 3250 or so
Old 12-04-2011, 12:57 PM
  #10  
jmd
TECH Addict
iTrader: (4)
 
jmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: T56th Street, Aridzona
Posts: 2,561
Received 26 Likes on 24 Posts

Post

Originally Posted by the_merv
He said 78 in the title..
Yeah but A includes the 81 models.

In general the frames are the same length. They changes the bumper shock / bracket mounting ears a little bit over the years though. The bumpers on some of the 78 A-bodies seem bigger, but are also only covering short aluminum bracket mounts instead of long shocks.

Unrelated, a 78 Monte fender, hood, trunklid are all lighter than the 81-up equivalent parts. I don't know if they used thinner steel or what as the hoods and fenders were not alum.

Some 78- Cutlass coupes and sedans had aluminum hoods. A lot of 78-80 Montes had aluminum decklids.

Originally Posted by GNCLONE
I'm going to guess that a low-end El Camino without many power options is going to be lighter than a 2 door Malibu which I would guess is maybe the second lightest.

The problem with the Grand Prix/Regal/Cutlass is that they generally had more options and had more plush carpet, sound deadener etc. My Regal Limited had really thick, heavy carpet. More weight.

My Grand National clone is about 3250 or so
I thought the Camino was heavier due to added length in the frame, bed, larger gas tank. :shrug:



Quick Reply: Difference between 78 a body and 82 g body?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 PM.