Foxbody vs Camaro vs Subaru.....
02-03-2013, 04:29 AM
#1
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando Fl.
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Foxbody vs Camaro vs Subaru..... Had some fun with my junk finally!
My Gt40 headed 306ci fox vs h/c/i/stall/drag radial lt1
Dig to 120ish.....
Also ran a friends subaru wagon from a dig (missed 3rd).....
My Gt40 headed 306ci fox vs h/c/i/stall/drag radial lt1
Dig to 120ish.....
Also ran a friends subaru wagon from a dig (missed 3rd).....
Last edited by BottleFedZ346; 02-03-2013 at 11:02 PM.
Trending Topics
02-03-2013, 10:09 PM
#10
TECH Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looked like fun, but the Subaru is what surprised me. It looked quite strong after what can only be described as a poor launch(from what I could see).
Why surprised? Considering the Mustangs mods, if that LT1 had no mods done, it would be lucky to stay within a few car lengths on a great run. The Mustang should run easily in the very low 13's and the old LT1 shouldn't.
Why surprised? Considering the Mustangs mods, if that LT1 had no mods done, it would be lucky to stay within a few car lengths on a great run. The Mustang should run easily in the very low 13's and the old LT1 shouldn't.
02-03-2013, 10:25 PM
#11
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
^^^^^^^^^a h/c/i lt should easily run bottom 12's or high 11's. If it's thought out mid to low 11's are doable. LT's can go 11's with just bolt-ons and some weight reduction, high 12's are easy for them. That lt should've won...but did'nt
02-03-2013, 10:59 PM
#12
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Orlando Fl.
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looked like fun, but the Subaru is what surprised me. It looked quite strong after what can only be described as a poor launch(from what I could see).
Why surprised? Considering the Mustangs mods, if that LT1 had no mods done, it would be lucky to stay within a few car lengths on a great run. The Mustang should run easily in the very low 13's and the old LT1 shouldn't.
Why surprised? Considering the Mustangs mods, if that LT1 had no mods done, it would be lucky to stay within a few car lengths on a great run. The Mustang should run easily in the very low 13's and the old LT1 shouldn't.
As for the camaro I was told it went 11.70 @ 117, couldnt tell ya if that's true or not, i pulled 3+ cars and was still pulling when i grabbed 4th....
02-04-2013, 08:57 AM
#16
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
It was pretty cold out last night (in the 40's) even on my slick's i wasnt hooking up to well, honestly i didnt think i did to bad considering he's awd and he told me that was the hardest the car has ever launched lol....
As for the camaro I was told it went 11.70 @ 117, couldnt tell ya if that's true or not, i pulled 3+ cars and was still pulling when i grabbed 4th....
As for the camaro I was told it went 11.70 @ 117, couldnt tell ya if that's true or not, i pulled 3+ cars and was still pulling when i grabbed 4th....
Thats funny, my full bolt on LT1 ran high 12s. Think you must have them confused with fox body's man lol
02-04-2013, 07:24 PM
#20
TECH Addict
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: N. FL
Posts: 2,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As for the camaro I was told it went 11.70 @ 117, couldnt tell ya if that's true or not, i pulled 3+ cars and was still pulling when i grabbed 4th....
What's funny is your utter lack of focus!
It should be 100% clear that I was saying the Mustang should run low 13's easily... I mean, it's not like I beat around the bush when I said it. The part about the UNmodified LT1 might've caught your attention too, but apparently not.