Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Does anybody plan on swapping to LS2 intake?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-09-2004, 07:12 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
BLKWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default Does anybody plan on swapping to LS2 intake?

When it becomes available? Wonder if this would do any good on a stock cube motor vs the LS6 intake? Or even a H/C 346?

Whos gonna jump?
Old 07-09-2004, 07:16 PM
  #2  
Staging Lane
 
Biomechanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Floorida
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if the cost is a little more than the LS6 I'll probably jump on it. I'll have to see some official flow numbers on the LS2 heads before switching my plans for patriot stage 2's
Old 07-09-2004, 07:20 PM
  #3  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
BLKWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Well would you throw it on what you have now? (thats what i mean?)
Old 07-09-2004, 07:21 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
 
BLKWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Loganville, GA
Posts: 4,049
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Biomechanoid
if the cost is a little more than the LS6 I'll probably jump on it. I'll have to see some official flow numbers on the LS2 heads before switching my plans for patriot stage 2's
Just read your sig...i would assume that to be a no.
Old 07-09-2004, 07:23 PM
  #5  
Staging Lane
 
Biomechanoid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Tampa, Floorida
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BLKWS6
Well would you throw it on what you have now? (thats what i mean?)

I would, but all's I have is a block, injectors, fuel rails, gaskets, and sump. no matter what I still need to buy an intake and I've pretty much settled on going with an LS6, but if the LS2 intake has significantly higher numbers and only a little higher in cost (maybe $100 tops) I'd seriously consider it.
Old 07-09-2004, 07:37 PM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Camaroholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Waco, TX
Posts: 6,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I'm waiting. Haven't been conviced that the FAST intake / 90mm TB is worth ~$1400 for maybe gaining a few HP. Seems like some gain, but some show nothing. Plus I have concerns about sealing issues with the FAST. My plan is for the LS2 intake and a TPIS 90mm throttle body.
Old 07-09-2004, 08:06 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (6)
 
2001CamaroGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
Posts: 4,766
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Camaroholic
I'm waiting. Haven't been conviced that the FAST intake / 90mm TB is worth ~$1400 for maybe gaining a few HP. Seems like some gain, but some show nothing. Plus I have concerns about sealing issues with the FAST. My plan is for the LS2 intake and a TPIS 90mm throttle body.

what he said, only I'll stay with the 80MM BBK I have now.....


the FAST would be nice but at $1400 it is NOT worth the cost to me.
Old 07-09-2004, 08:14 PM
  #8  
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Futral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: LA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Heres the skinny...on the flow bench the LS2 dosen't "flow" any more air over an LS6 on a single runner test,but on a dyno test average gains have been 12-16 HP over an LS6 on a good heads\cam 346. The HP gain is due to a little difference in plenum design and the 90mm T\B setup. They are a 3 piece design and use the same 4-bolt flange layout as a FAST\TPIS 90mm so they will bolt right up. So I feel that they will be a good mod for the money spent.
Old 07-09-2004, 08:21 PM
  #9  
TECH Resident
 
KGSloan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
Heres the skinny...on the flow bench the LS2 dosen't "flow" any more air over an LS6 on a single runner test,but on a dyno test average gains have been 12-16 HP over an LS6 on a good heads\cam 346. The HP gain is due to a little difference in plenum design and the 90mm T\B setup. They are a 3 piece design and use the same 4-bolt flange layout as a FAST\TPIS 90mm so they will bolt right up. So I feel that they will be a good mod for the money spent.

thanks for the info

this sounds sweet!
Old 07-09-2004, 08:28 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
 
FASTONE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Foley, Alabama-southern Alabama
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bet the LS2 intake won"t cost that much more then the ls6 since it comes from GM.GM is not out to make a killing like FAST, plus the consumer is not paying for the R&D of this product.This will be a stock replacement part for all the new LS2 cars and hopefully fairly priced .Thats interesting Allen that the LS2 don"t flow more air but makes more hp.THANKS for the great info,BTW your engines ROCK!!!
Old 07-09-2004, 08:53 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
MNC5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Twin Cities
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Futral Motorsports
Heres the skinny...on the flow bench the LS2 dosen't "flow" any more air over an LS6 on a single runner test,but on a dyno test average gains have been 12-16 HP over an LS6 on a good heads\cam 346. The HP gain is due to a little difference in plenum design and the 90mm T\B setup. They are a 3 piece design and use the same 4-bolt flange layout as a FAST\TPIS 90mm so they will bolt right up. So I feel that they will be a good mod for the money spent.

From the dyno charts I've seen on the Corvette Forum it makes a bunch more power and torque below the peak #'s vs the LS6 or LS1. It looks like the manifold is probably responsible for most of the improvement to the powerband. So its not always about peak flow #'s.

How soon are the LS2's going to start showing up??
Old 07-09-2004, 08:55 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Scoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

excuse my ignorance but has this intake been test fitted to a Fbody yet?
Old 07-09-2004, 09:00 PM
  #13  
TECH Addict
 
66ImpalaLT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The LS2 is .3L larger, of course it will make more power down low.
Old 07-09-2004, 09:03 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Scoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

These dyno #'s your talking about, they were tested on an LS1 / LS6 car?
Old 07-09-2004, 09:11 PM
  #15  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

On a 346 road race engine with a ZO6 manifold the flywheel HP went from 523 peak to 540 peak with the manifold and 90mm TB. The early gains are not there on the one I tested, the gains were mostly above 4500 rpm. It looked to me like the 90mm TB was responsible for most of the gain.

The manifold will fit anywhere a LS6 will, although the newer breather coming out of the valley cover may need some modification.

Kurt
Old 07-09-2004, 09:19 PM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Scoobie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Thanks 427!
Old 07-09-2004, 09:35 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
MARKSZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: bama bitch
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

im waiting on gm to stock them since dad is a dealer i want to try one out pretty bad maybe the cost want be crazy
Old 07-09-2004, 10:46 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
BoneSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ashland, KY
Posts: 1,371
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would a stock tb bolt right up, or will that have to be modified?
Old 07-10-2004, 09:24 PM
  #19  
427
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
427's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clayton, North Carolina
Posts: 3,898
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

The intake has a 4 bolt pattern. The bottom two are the same as old bolt pattern but the top has two on same pattern as lower. FAST throttlebody has the right pattern or i'm sure an adapter plate could be made.
Kurt
Originally Posted by BoneSS
Would a stock tb bolt right up, or will that have to be modified?
Old 07-10-2004, 09:35 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (8)
 
ss rally red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Destin FL
Posts: 4,298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

This is a very interesting post, I think that it would probably be a decent increase over the LS6 intake for a minimum cost



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.