Can somebody explain to me why engines perform worse at high altitude?
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can somebody explain to me why engines perform worse at high altitude?
I just moved to Colorado from Virginia. I went from sea level to 6000+ feet. My mileage is horrible now, approx. 250 mi. to a tank and the power loss is very noticeable. I can no longer chirp 2nd gear. Is this normal or could there be something else wrong with the car? I understand that the oxygen levels are not as high here and some performance loss is to be expected...but this much?
#7
TECH Fanatic
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
20% loss is about right. We are the same elevation as Denver here in ABQ, so you must be in CS or so.
Not only is there less oxygen content at the higher elevations ( main reason for MPG loss ) but the atmospheric pressure is considerably lower too. Less volume of air overall being "pushed" into the cylinders. Basic internal combustion engine definition = air pump.
Either way, it sucks sometimes. Just think tho, when you go down to a lower elevation next time it will feel like you installed a supercharger! J/K, trying to put a positive spin on things for ya.
Not only is there less oxygen content at the higher elevations ( main reason for MPG loss ) but the atmospheric pressure is considerably lower too. Less volume of air overall being "pushed" into the cylinders. Basic internal combustion engine definition = air pump.
Either way, it sucks sometimes. Just think tho, when you go down to a lower elevation next time it will feel like you installed a supercharger! J/K, trying to put a positive spin on things for ya.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Originally Posted by ktmrider
Not only is there less oxygen content at the higher elevations ( main reason for MPG loss ) but the atmospheric pressure is considerably lower too. Less volume of air overall being "pushed" into the cylinders. Basic internal combustion engine definition = air pump.
#11
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
Originally Posted by ktmrider
Less volume of air overall being "pushed" into the cylinders. Basic internal combustion engine definition = air pump.
Joblo, where'd you move to?
#12
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
Originally Posted by P Mack
At lower altitudes I don't think there is a gain from the pressure on the intake stroke because the piston also has to push against more pressure on the exhaust stroke, not to mention there is more pressure on the other side of the piston in the crankcase. I think it all evens out. The real gain is from higher cylinder pressure after combustion due to more oxygen being in the cylinder.
Joblo, where'd you move to?
Joblo, where'd you move to?
#13
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: The Republic of Texas
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Look at the vehicles that run the Pikes Peak hill climb; some of these cars/trucks actually have air being injected like gasoline into the combustion chambers from compressed air tanks to help with the thin air up there. Like everyone has stated here, the motor is a big air pump and the less air density, the harder it has to work with less so the output is less...
#15
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
I reread my post and I guess it's not very clear. On a 4-stroke engine there is the intake, compression, power, and exhaust stroke. All the power comes from the power stroke, and it takes power on the intake, compression, and exhaust strokes. The power it takes to pull air into the cylinder and push the exhaust out is called pumping losses. No doubt you will make more power on the power stroke with a more dense intake charge. But some people have said that the power lost due to pumping losses is greater at higher altitude, and I don't think they are.
#16
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Posts: 2,686
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I am getting 30-31mpg doing 75mph with an M6 going from Albuquerque to Santa Fe (~55mi) on my commute to work. I actually tested it out for several weeks. At 85mph it drops to 26-27mpg.
Albuquerques elevation is 5000 ft and Santa Fe's elevation is 7000ft. I test engines for emissions purposes and depending on a given day we ususally correct our results to about 22%.
Albuquerques elevation is 5000 ft and Santa Fe's elevation is 7000ft. I test engines for emissions purposes and depending on a given day we ususally correct our results to about 22%.
#17
Banned
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by P Mack
At lower altitudes I don't think there is a gain from the pressure on the intake stroke because the piston also has to push against more pressure on the exhaust stroke, not to mention there is more pressure on the other side of the piston in the crankcase. I think it all evens out. The real gain is from higher cylinder pressure after combustion due to more oxygen being in the cylinder.
Joblo, where'd you move to?
Joblo, where'd you move to?