Dyno #'s for 383 stroker...need opinions
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dyno #'s for 383 stroker...need opinions
I put a stroker in my 97 Silverado about two years ago and put down the numbers in my sig. The problem is that it seems that the only comparisons I had were LT1, and LS1 engines, which have better technology and parts. So my question is, what are some decent rwhp/rwtq #'s for a regualr small block stroker? What have been some results of others? (non LT1 or LS1)
#2
10 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: lost
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverado
I put a stroker in my 97 Silverado about two years ago and put down the numbers in my sig. The problem is that it seems that the only comparisons I had were LT1, and LS1 engines, which have better technology and parts. So my question is, what are some decent rwhp/rwtq #'s for a regualr small block stroker? What have been some results of others? (non LT1 or LS1)
whats in the internals, lt1 and ls1's dont necessarily have better parts. also is it carb'd?
#6
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont think its very applicable to compare LS1/LT1 designs with the older technology and designs of traditional small block engines. My heads are mildly ported Vortecs with probably the worst fuel injection design of the 90's. I just was wondering what other street 383's (traditional small blocks) were putting down.
#7
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're power potential is directly related to a few key variables to make this simple...
What is your compression ration with a 58cc or 63cc chambered head? You should be around 10.5:1 for some decent power.
Next up is your heads...the vortecs aren't the best for power. Some brodix or dart heads would make some serious power if you got a nasty cam (bigger than your LT4 hotcam).
Next up is your induction. I'm assuming you are using TBI, throttle body injection. Which was acceptable in its day, but if you were looking to upgrade, a victor intake with a big 1600cfm throttle body on top.
With all those upgrades you would be approaching 500rwhp depending on how aggressive you go. But for right now you are making good power/torque considering the drawbacks of heads, intake design, and relatively small cam, auto, truck drivetrain...etc.
What is your compression ration with a 58cc or 63cc chambered head? You should be around 10.5:1 for some decent power.
Next up is your heads...the vortecs aren't the best for power. Some brodix or dart heads would make some serious power if you got a nasty cam (bigger than your LT4 hotcam).
Next up is your induction. I'm assuming you are using TBI, throttle body injection. Which was acceptable in its day, but if you were looking to upgrade, a victor intake with a big 1600cfm throttle body on top.
With all those upgrades you would be approaching 500rwhp depending on how aggressive you go. But for right now you are making good power/torque considering the drawbacks of heads, intake design, and relatively small cam, auto, truck drivetrain...etc.
Trending Topics
#9
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Florida # of drag strips runs: ?!?!?
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
my 383 makes 373 rwhp and 362 rwtq using 11:1 compression, canfield 195 cc heads (unported), crane 518/536 lift solid cam, victor jr intake and holley 750 hp carb. This is throough a TH350 trans and 3.73 gears and run the #s in my sig at 3475 raceweight on pump gas.
Derek
Derek
#12
TECH Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverado
Thanks for the info! This gives me an idea of where I stand with other small blocks.
assuming you're still running the stock injection and intake these are very good numbers. the 19#hr injectors are about screeming at you. very nice work. i would look into doing an intake swap. some people have been pulling this off recently and keeping the stock pcm. an intake swap alone would gain you some hp for sure and leave you more room for future mods with bigger injectors.
#14
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fresno, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zippy
assuming you're still running the stock injection and intake these are very good numbers. the 19#hr injectors are about screeming at you. very nice work. i would look into doing an intake swap. some people have been pulling this off recently and keeping the stock pcm. an intake swap alone would gain you some hp for sure and leave you more room for future mods with bigger injectors.
#16
TECH Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 4,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i'll get pictures of the ramjet swap a friend is doing. it was originally something i was going to do for one of my customers, but this guy bought the prochargerand ramjet setup from the customer. he'll have the procharger and ramjet up and running here with the stock pcm by the end of next month. i'll post pictures and results.
#17
7 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gainesville, Florida # of drag strips runs: ?!?!?
Posts: 8,834
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
I've currently got an Edelbrock Performer RPM system set at 100 hp shot. The N/A and nos-assisted 1/4 times are in my sig. I haven't gone much beyond the 100 hp pills b/c I'd be pushing over 600 flywheel hp with a cast crank, and I'd like to get a forged set-up with H-beam rods before hitting the button with more
Derek
Derek
#18
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rcfast
actually there 19# @43.5psi and since the fuel pressure is around 60 PSI they flow 23#'s which is supposed to support close to 400hp according to a injector calculator, although i personally don't think it will support that much.As for the manifold there aren't really any that are simple swaps. The marine manifold would be the easiest to swap, though a manifold swap will be pricey. A manifold upgrade should definately be worth it though and im working on getting a different one on mine. Just need a engine to bolt it to.
How can you think that the "19lb" injectors wont support 400hp when I'm pushing 420hp at the crank with drivetrain loss?
#19
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: fresno, ca
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverado
How can you think that the "19lb" injectors wont support 400hp when I'm pushing 420hp at the crank with drivetrain loss?