A4 or M6
#1
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: El paso, tx
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A4 or M6
What do u guys think. I have a few people telling me that on a cammed car a a4 is better than a M6. Take into account rear end holds. and a4 has a 3500SSF . which car would run faster? the one that launches off the line on the rev limiter or at 7000 RPMs or the a4 that stalls at 2000Rpms and flashes to 3500? All else being the same.
#3
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: El paso, tx
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No. I am talking about who is faster. Not consistent. not an A3 on tranny brake. I mean launching at 3500 as opposed to launching at 7000 rpms. All else doesn't matter. Not drivability. Not trying to decide between the both. I know a 350 on a TB is faster and efficient. I mean a 4L60E. who is faster. i think its on M6
#5
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Oshawa (Home of the 5th-gen)
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It would take a damn good stick driver to beat a stalled A4 (LS1 car, right? ) in the 1/4 mile. Figure most LS1's are good for low 13's stock. SOME M6's have hit high 12's with little to no mods. Put a ~3500 stall into an A4, and you can be hitting mid-high 12's. IMO, the stalled A4 for the win, all other things being EQUAL (engine, cam, suspension, tires, etc.).
Just IMO.
Just IMO.