LSX Manifold
11-03-2006, 10:28 PM
#2
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: luke AFB, Az houston is home
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i would go with an ls6 unless ur planning on building an all out race car.
___________________________
02 t/a a4. 6.0l lq9, comp cam, lid, mac mids, ory, borla.
___________________________
02 t/a a4. 6.0l lq9, comp cam, lid, mac mids, ory, borla.
11-04-2006, 08:49 AM
#4
11 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by staringback05
uhhh....what exactly are you talking about by "lsx"?....
lsx is just the "series" of motor
lsx is just the "series" of motor
F.A.S.T. LSX intake manifold.
...as for 2000camaro-ss, the FAST LSX would be overkill if your planning on just running stock heads, go with the LS6 intake. If you have heads/cam get a FAST 90/90 setup - it consistently dynos 15 or so rwhp more than an LS6/ported tb combo.
11-04-2006, 11:15 AM
#6
Originally Posted by tacklebox
F.A.S.T. LSX intake manifold.
...as for 2000camaro-ss, the FAST LSX would be overkill if your planning on just running stock heads, go with the LS6 intake. If you have heads/cam get a FAST 90/90 setup - it consistently dynos 15 or so rwhp more than an LS6/ported tb combo.
...as for 2000camaro-ss, the FAST LSX would be overkill if your planning on just running stock heads, go with the LS6 intake. If you have heads/cam get a FAST 90/90 setup - it consistently dynos 15 or so rwhp more than an LS6/ported tb combo.
now how hard would it have been for him to just put "FAST 78 v. LS6"?....and yes for his mods, that would be a little to much and a waste of money 
