g-force stuff really that bad???
10-25-2007, 09:55 AM
#1
g-force stuff really that bad??? i've been hearing some things on hear recently about g-force transmission parts, namely the gear sets, being garbage and having a tendency to pull the wet tissue paper act in high power situations. problem is this...i'm going to be putting in a 427 in a little while and i'm shooting for about 550-600 rwhp - no big deal - BUT, i plan on throwing on twin turbos in a few more years and i need a trans that can stand up to 900 rwhp...so far the only unit advertising at that power level is g-force. since i'm getting the motor work, trany swap (auto to m6) and rear swapped at the same time, i'd like to put in a trans that can handle the power of my final product when all of the other work gets done instead of having to upgrade to yet another m6 when i add the turbos...
...(panting)...
long story made short, i need to put a g-force trans in my car eventually and, for the above reasons, i'd like to do it soon...so...are they really as bad as i've been hearing???
...(panting)...
long story made short, i need to put a g-force trans in my car eventually and, for the above reasons, i'd like to do it soon...so...are they really as bad as i've been hearing???
10-25-2007, 07:12 PM
#3
Banned
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Adkins - Tx
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are always two sides to every story . I've had issues with G force gears before as well but not 100% certain about the cause of failure in the units . They were T5's not T56 units though .
