De-stroked 377 (400 block w/ 350 bottom)
#7
I have even seen the 3.25 cranks in 400 blocks in round track engines.
but thats where a cubic inch limit is enforced...
really theres no replacement for displacement but, it sure is convenient to run regular non-counterweight balancers and flywheels and no heavy weight added to the crank to get internal balance. plus you can cram in some extra valve size. the large bore also unshrouds the valves, big rods without grinding/clearancing, pistons without crazy pin heights, 350 factory forged cranks... the advantages kind of outweigh the disadvantages.
BTW federal mogul/sealed power make a 1 piece main bearing. no spacers
but thats where a cubic inch limit is enforced...
really theres no replacement for displacement but, it sure is convenient to run regular non-counterweight balancers and flywheels and no heavy weight added to the crank to get internal balance. plus you can cram in some extra valve size. the large bore also unshrouds the valves, big rods without grinding/clearancing, pistons without crazy pin heights, 350 factory forged cranks... the advantages kind of outweigh the disadvantages.
BTW federal mogul/sealed power make a 1 piece main bearing. no spacers
Trending Topics
#8
http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/fe...les/index.html
try this link and then maybe you guys will see why i want one, its a well proven combo
try this link and then maybe you guys will see why i want one, its a well proven combo
#9
6 & 8 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois, RT 66 dragway area
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.
Track only drag cars used to love the 377". A light car used to fly with one. With all the bad *** cranks & blocks out now, everyone is going big. 400" + small blocks are everywhere. I know I'm old, but street cars prefered a 383" over the 377" in my day.
.
Track only drag cars used to love the 377". A light car used to fly with one. With all the bad *** cranks & blocks out now, everyone is going big. 400" + small blocks are everywhere. I know I'm old, but street cars prefered a 383" over the 377" in my day.
.
#11
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you do decide to use a 377 type combo I would recommend useing a Scat 3.5" stroke crank instead of the traditional 3.48". They make them in a cast steel crank rated to 650HP and their various forged models as well. This will save you some money on having the block decked. You will then just need to have the block surfaces trued up and you will be very close to +/- zero deck. Depending on the bore size of your block you may be very close to 383 cubes (example: a 4.165" bore with a 3.5" stroke is 382 cubes). From the dyno data that I have seen your short stroke large bore motors will actually make slightly more TQ than a small bore long stroke motor. The other odd peculiarity is that the small bore long stroke motor will peak at a higher rpm than the large bore small stroke motor with the same camshaft. Just food for thought.
#12
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats some intesting info... I've never really done the research on the big bore/short stroke vs the smaller bore/long stroke... I'll take that into consideration...
#15
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
honestly, unless you are either using a stock block, and will make enough power to split it with the 377... or the 377 is just a ton cheaper, there is no reason not to build a 400 (406 to be technical). It will make more power, and probably be a lot easier on parts.
#16
TECH Resident
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Champaign IL
Posts: 814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Especially with the small stall in heavy pickup....its a no-brainer....Build the 406ci!
#17
6 & 8 Second Club
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois, RT 66 dragway area
Posts: 2,284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
.
Weight is not a friend, especially of a 377", heavy truck on the street, I agree with everyone else. Inch's & stroke will do what you want. Good luck.
.
Weight is not a friend, especially of a 377", heavy truck on the street, I agree with everyone else. Inch's & stroke will do what you want. Good luck.
.
Last edited by mrdragster1970; 12-13-2007 at 03:41 PM. Reason: spelling
#18
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats kinda what I was thinking, but I already have some of the stuff to do a 377. So I will do the 406... I've looked and decided to get the following: Eagle Street/Strip bottom end (Cast crank, H rods, Keith Black forged pistons) Partiot Freedom series heads w/ custom cam (240-260 and ~ 525-530 lift, havnt decided yet) Vic jr intake and holly 750 dominator. I'm thinking about 475 w/ this set up w/ no spray.
#19
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 1,360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats kinda what I was thinking, but I already have some of the stuff to do a 377. So I will do the 406... I've looked and decided to get the following: Eagle Street/Strip bottom end (Cast crank, H rods, Keith Black forged pistons) Partiot Freedom series heads w/ custom cam (240-260 and ~ 525-530 lift, havnt decided yet) Vic jr intake and holly 750 dominator. I'm thinking about 475 w/ this set up w/ no spray.