06 gxp vs cammed 95 mustang 5.0

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

08-01-2014, 03:38 PM

#21

LS1 Racing

TECH Addict

iTrader: (15)

Join Date: Aug 2002

Location: 78°14′46″N 15°27′56″E

Posts: 2,419

Likes: 0

Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by "MAC"

Lol dude would be an idiot if he did. That car would/should destroy both of y'all

Your friend should just sell his car for 5k then put another 5k on top of that to buy a decent ls1 fbody.

Good suggestion.

I'm into mine for about $10k, including the price of the car. It's probably the cheapest way to run really low 11's without the spray.

Reply Like

08-01-2014, 11:55 PM

#22

CrimsonGXP

On The Tree

Thread Starter

Join Date: Apr 2014

Location: Sartell, MN

Posts: 138

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by LS1 Racing

Sounds like the Mustang had the bad driver mod or he was full of **** about his dyno number, as was mentioned before. The fact that Mustang had the AODE trans probably also had a lot to do with it. That has to be the worse transmission every fitted to a performance car.

Im gonna assume that he is full of ****. The rate that I pulled on him was like an auto lt1 vs a manual ls1 once the ls1 hits 3rd. It was an absolute *** raping. His car does sound good though!

Reply Like

08-18-2014, 02:28 PM

#23

JLFIII

On The Tree

iTrader: (1)

Join Date: May 2013

Posts: 152

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrimsonGXP

Im gonna assume that he is full of ****. The rate that I pulled on him was like an auto lt1 vs a manual ls1 once the ls1 hits 3rd. It was an absolute *** raping. His car does sound good though!

I'm not surprised you ripped him a new one, I had a 95 GT Mustang years ago...the car was beautiful and sounded amazing but it was terribly slow even with a 5spd. An automatic....even modded you should have spanked him.

Reply Like

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 2
Next
Last