projektnitemare13

iTrader: (4)

exactly as it says, I was wondering because I saw there is a difference in layout with the 93 stuff, just wasnt sure if that calls for a different fuel line as well. thanks.

duh

iTrader: (16)

one or the other is a little longer, but IIRC they will still plug into the fuel rail without issue. I wouldn't worry about it.

shbox

It is not going to lay out like you would want it to. The 93s connections are in the front of the intake and 94-97s are in the back.

RamAir95TA

iTrader: (2)

Rob is right. They will plug in but they are designed to mate to the front of the fuel rail, not the back.

projektnitemare13

iTrader: (4)

alright thank you, I thought this was the case but wanted to make sure.

Rainman_11

iTrader: (1)

I have the '93 fuel lines on my '95 Z. They are shorter, so I don't have the same slack or routing that the original lines used, but I haven't had any problems with them.

shbox

His situation is the opposite. He'll end up with a lot of slack.

DisturbedTA

iTrader: (3)

it wont bolt the front crossover tube on the 94-97 fuel rail will hit the intake the newer intakes have the grove for it

2manycamaros

i did the same thing i have a 93 but put a 96 motor in. in my case i had the 96 intake and fuel rail but with the 93 throttle body. the lines plugged in just fine they just have a loop to them from entry to the rail no big deal. half the people who have seen my car dont even realize anything is differnt!

2manycamaros

my bad didnt read it right i thought you meant plugging the 93 lines in on the later fuel rail but the later ones are longer but plug in just the same

rt426gt

I need new fuel and brake lines, front to back on a 94 v6, are 93's too much different to use? How much do you have to change them? Or is there somewhere to get 94's? Thanks

shbox

93 fuel lines would not reach on a 94 at the engine.