LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Build question - Boost and Heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2013, 10:01 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default Build question - Boost and Heads

I have a build question regarding heads and compression ratio:
Im going to be building a 355 for boost this summer, as my car is running a stock internals lt1 and id like to turn up the wick and not worry about its insides turning to mush, so i figured before that happens id get another mill underway.

My issue is this: Current plans are to use stock heads cleaned up and maybe ported a bit (this is not a max effort build, rather a safe 8-10 psi build) and with the 54cc chambers and use of a 22cc dish piston i figure I can get a compression ratio of around 9.4 (assuming cometic head gaskets at 0.040, and a deck height of 0.010). However my brother (max effort build person) just let me know in the next while he MIGHT be swapping out his afr 195's with a 65cc chamber for the new 227s and would let me take them off his hands. This would drop me down nearly a whole compression point to about 8.45.

My question is: Is there a happy medium I can find, using a good 2618 piston to get me in a compression ratio that will work well if i end up using the stock head, or get to swap to the AFR's in the future? Using a 14cc dish would get me about 10.3 with stock heads, and 9.1 with the AFRs, for that i assume i would need to get a custom piston made from diamond or someone of the like, has anyone done anything similar and can provide some insight?

Thanks guys
Old 04-03-2013, 10:08 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
 
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You do realize people will run 8psi on a completely stock engine?

If you don't plan on running large amount of boost, have a good tune, I wouldn't be afraid to run stock compression on 8psi.

8.45:1 would be a dog off the boost.

Diamond is literally down the street from me, if you are going the power adder route some custom pistons are definitely nice.
Old 04-03-2013, 10:10 PM
  #3  
duh
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
 
duh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: burbs of chi-town
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

With the LTx engines and forged internals, I wouldn't be afraid to run 10:1 on 92/93, whichever you have in your area. As long as the tune is right, you would most likely get away with up to 10psi. I wouldn't go much higher, but in my experience you'll be fine. Fwiw my brother did a turbo cavalier (I know, assinine) that was 10.5:1, ran on pump 93, and had ignition issues, but still was a mid 12 sec. car. Not too bad when the best 60' he ever had was a 2.2x
Old 04-03-2013, 10:54 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

You do realize people will run 8psi on a completely stock engine?
If you don't plan on running large amount of boost, have a good tune, I wouldn't be afraid to run stock compression on 8psi.
8.45:1 would be a dog off the boost.
Diamond is literally down the street from me, if you are going the power adder route some custom pistons are definitely nice
I do, its just I DD the car and an internal failure would rather hinder that. Also im a working student so the longevity of the car right now is very important, as well no one locally tunes lt1s unless you have bigstuff3 or something of similar caliber.

With the LTx engines and forged internals, I wouldn't be afraid to run 10:1 on 92/93, whichever you have in your area. As long as the tune is right, you would most likely get away with up to 10psi. I wouldn't go much higher, but in my experience you'll be fine. Fwiw my brother did a turbo cavalier (I know, assinine) that was 10.5:1, ran on pump 93, and had ignition issues, but still was a mid 12 sec. car. Not too bad when the best 60' he ever had was a 2.2x
With that in mind, could I run say a 12cc dish, and that way be in ok shape either way on the heads? (10.5 on stock heads, 9.3 on the AFRs)

I guess, what is the lowest static CR id go without it being a dog out of boost?
Is dynamic compression a large thing that comes into play here? I hear people saying you want to shoot for around 8:1 dynamic compression ratio, based on cam selection as well. If this is a bigger factor than static, that gives me more room to adjust as i could delay the selection, but still purchase pistons and rotating assembly and get that together while waiting on the decision of the head. (IE, i could run 10.5:1 static compression on a 12cc piston, 10psi and run a cam with an ABDC of about 60 degrees and have a static compression around 8.5:1. If i get the large heads, I would be running a 9.3:1 compression 10psi and get a cam with an ABDC of closer to 50 if thats possible, and have a dynamic of 8:1) ?
Old 04-04-2013, 06:26 AM
  #5  
Man-Crush Warning
iTrader: (1)
 
Shownomercy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,150
Received 119 Likes on 88 Posts

Default

If you are dropping the money on good forged pistons, getting em custom to what you want CR wise is nothing. JE did mine for basically what the normal set would have cost.
Old 04-04-2013, 11:47 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Shownomercy
If you are dropping the money on good forged pistons, getting em custom to what you want CR wise is nothing. JE did mine for basically what the normal set would have cost.
Im for sure ok with ordering a set of custom pistons. I guess my main question is: Is dynamic, or static CR more important to design around?
If static is very important- is 9 on the low end, 10 on the high end going to be ok to run?
Old 04-04-2013, 01:34 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
nitrous2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If it were my build i would have a 10:1 CR and run 8-10lb on the street with 93. When at the track run some sort of high octane 112 and turn it up to 15-18, but hey thats just me. i would have a good set of forged rods in it though; nothing crazy expensive.
Old 04-04-2013, 03:11 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nitrous2fast
If it were my build i would have a 10:1 CR and run 8-10lb on the street with 93. When at the track run some sort of high octane 112 and turn it up to 15-18, but hey thats just me. i would have a good set of forged rods in it though; nothing crazy expensive.
So with that you figure stock heads 10:1 i should be ok? Thatd be running a 15cc dish, meaning if i used the AFRs id be around 9:1

Can anyone confirm for me the deck height on a lt1 block? Ive been using 0.010 just for calculation sake.

It would be getting good rods and pistons, think stock crank would be ok with those kind of numbers?
Old 04-04-2013, 03:38 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
 
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Stock crank is stronger than cast aftermarket cranks.

Stock crank would easily hold 500hp.
Just use ARP fasteners.
Old 04-04-2013, 04:34 PM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
nitrous2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Stock crank would be fine.

With boost head choices get funny. The great thing about boost is it pushes air into the chambers. Air doesn't flow the exact same as when being pulled. AMAZINGLY ported heads don't make as much difference now. Good, quality ported stockers will flow plenty of air to make pretty big numbers.

Are you wanting this car to be street driven quick machine or drag beast?
Old 04-04-2013, 04:41 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by nitrous2fast
Stock crank would be fine.

With boost head choices get funny. The great thing about boost is it pushes air into the chambers. Air doesn't flow the exact same as when being pulled. AMAZINGLY ported heads don't make as much difference now. Good, quality ported stockers will flow plenty of air to make pretty big numbers.

Are you wanting this car to be street driven quick machine or drag beast?
Its going to remain street driven, but id like it to be quick when it is tracked. The thing is the AFR heads have already been ported and put to boost use on a 383, so the ported AFRs should outflow ported stock heads right?

My problem is trying to find a piston that i can use to get myself a good middle compression ratio using either head, which is proving to be very hard.

With ported AFRs, 10psi and a suited cam, am i going to be pushing the safety of the stock crank? I assume thatd get me close to if not over about 500?
Old 04-04-2013, 04:50 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
nitrous2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There really isn't a safety limit on the stock crank. IT IS A BEAST! to say the least... rpms probably are going to be the only concern pushing a lot of power though it, But you probably won't be getting close to those rpms... 10psi is relative to the setup it is ran through. The actual amount of air required to run 10psi with the stock heads is going to be quite a bit different than the amount for the ported afrs (assuming vs stock non-ported heads). As well as power achieved by both. A very fun street car that will get into max boost fast as well as not rip the tires off the rims will be to run a higher CR and less boost I.E. Stock heads on 10-12lb with 10.5CR.
Old 04-04-2013, 04:59 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Thats what i mean about the heads. The AFRs at 10psi is going to be much more air than the stock heads at 10psi no?

Also i will be using the SC wastegate boost controller method to be able to adjust boost more readily than swapping pullies. Meaning ill pulley for say 15 but have the WG set for 10, that way itll come into the 10psi sooner.

That aside, i guess ill mostly need to wait to see what happens with the heads as to what piston i pick. Best case senario would be the AFRs with a flattop forged piston to get about 9.8:1 compression

Edit: next question would be, if using stock crank, what rod should i go with? 6 inch rod or 5.7?
Old 04-04-2013, 08:23 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
 
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Are you planning turbo or Supercharger?
I assumed you were talking about a turbo at first.

A 355 is only stock 5.7" rod stock 3.48" crank and the bores bored 30 over. (4.030) that makes a 355.

Yes psi is a measurement of restriction. 10psi in a 1/2in pipe is the same pressure but less volume than 10psi in a 1in pipe.

~9.5:1 I wouldn't be afraid to run 20+ psi on.
So 9.8:1 would give you decent power off the boost, and give you room to run more psi. I'd probably wouldn't run more than like 18psi on that compression ratio.

As Nitrous says if you run the smaller heads requiring less volume to get the same psi it will get to full boost quicker. You start opening things up and you need more volume which means more rpms to get to the boost. Yes it will make more power, but you are talking about a street machine. You don't cruise the street at 3500rpm. The track you shouldn't see below 4000rpm.

Street, quick spooling is more fun.
Old 04-04-2013, 09:01 PM
  #15  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Its a supercharger: Procharger D1 (not the d1sc, this has a higher max impeller speed as well as a larger step up ratio)

Can you not get a 355 out of a 6inch rod, 3.48 crank and 30 over bore as well? I didnt figure rod length effected CI, however the benefits of dwell time and decreased side load i thought may be beneficial in a boosted motor.

The SC will be pullied for a higher RPM than the boost it will be making, if that makes sense, using the wastegate boost control method. So mid 9:1 will be ok to shoot for in a street car.

Last edited by BigBadWhitey; 04-05-2013 at 01:06 PM.
Old 04-05-2013, 11:50 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
nitrous2fast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

with the smaller stroke of the 3.48 crank, the side loading and dwell time has little difference between the 5.7" and 6" rods.
Old 04-05-2013, 07:51 PM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
myltwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Palm Harbor, FL
Posts: 2,969
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Make sure if you run a SC, to key the crank and run a decent hub/balancer.
Old 04-06-2013, 02:10 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
BigBadWhitey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 652
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

The crank is keyed and will be in the new engine as well. Im debating going to one of the ATI dampers but im not sure if thats really needed? If i could get a good deal on one id grab it i suppose.

These are the parts im thinking of going for bottom end, and input is greatly appreciated!
Crank: Stock
Rods: Scat 5.7 (or 6? may need to get more input) H beam rods PN 2-250-5700-2100A
Pistons: Diamond 22cc dish PN 11420
Piston Rings: Total seal Maxseal gapless top PN MS3690-35
Main bearings: Clevite H series (are these good?)
Rod bearings: Clevite H series (again, ok?)
Cam Bearings: Clevite 77 cam bearings PN SH-290S (i have no idea on these)
Main bolts: ARP main bolts PN 134-5002 (do i need the small journal or large journal ones?)

anything else im forgetting as far as major assembly pieces?
Old 04-06-2013, 03:25 PM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
 
F0x Slaughter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,037
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I wouldn't run gapless rings.

It has been proven by changing the gap a stock SBC 350 picked up 33hp. Just from reducing the gap. Ring gap is very important.
Old 04-06-2013, 03:45 PM
  #20  
On The Tree
 
Z28tek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 173
Received 12 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Have you completely ruled out a 383 rotating assembly and heads/cam package?


Quick Reply: Build question - Boost and Heads



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.