how much HP am I losing with this exhaust?
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston/The Woodlands
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how much HP am I losing with this exhaust?
I was wondering if someone could guesstimate how much hp I am loosing with this exhaust
current setup: true-duels under axle all the way out back
pacesetter long tube's, to 2.5" piping, to a 3" x-pipe, then back to 2.5" piping, to 3" dynomax bullets, then back to 2.5" piping then out to the back of the car.
(its was only $175 and is acually done very nice)
vs.
new setup maybe: true duels dumped before the axle
3" piping all the way through, with x-pipe, and dynomax bullets, then dumped before the axle.
so... how bad is my first setup hurting me?
motor: 383 - JE Ultralite Forged Pistons, Forged eagle H beam, Forged eagle crank, 48 lb injectors, MSD ignition, 58mm BBK throttle body, walbro fuel pump, 230/240 .516/.522 112lsa, BRODIX heads 292 cfm @ .500 lift, P-to-P matched Intake, P-to-P matched headers, lots of other stuff, but that should be the major stuff... i think...
the builder swears up and down it would put some where around 450 to the wheels, but I have not dyno tuned it yet. (and he also does not know about the exhaust)
thanks in advance for you guys input.
current setup: true-duels under axle all the way out back
pacesetter long tube's, to 2.5" piping, to a 3" x-pipe, then back to 2.5" piping, to 3" dynomax bullets, then back to 2.5" piping then out to the back of the car.
(its was only $175 and is acually done very nice)
vs.
new setup maybe: true duels dumped before the axle
3" piping all the way through, with x-pipe, and dynomax bullets, then dumped before the axle.
so... how bad is my first setup hurting me?
motor: 383 - JE Ultralite Forged Pistons, Forged eagle H beam, Forged eagle crank, 48 lb injectors, MSD ignition, 58mm BBK throttle body, walbro fuel pump, 230/240 .516/.522 112lsa, BRODIX heads 292 cfm @ .500 lift, P-to-P matched Intake, P-to-P matched headers, lots of other stuff, but that should be the major stuff... i think...
the builder swears up and down it would put some where around 450 to the wheels, but I have not dyno tuned it yet. (and he also does not know about the exhaust)
thanks in advance for you guys input.
#2
12 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 869
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well 2.5 would probably work fine for you, I just don't like the 3" Xpipe, the gas has to expand and then contract again..
it's probably not worth much but if you want every bit then why not?
it's probably not worth much but if you want every bit then why not?
#4
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston/The Woodlands
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by siniSSter
You don't think the 48lb. injectors are to much for your application.
why, there not hurting me are they?
#6
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston/The Woodlands
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ColeTrains'96Z28
well if you go wet setup like me you don't need bigger injectors. and a dry setup, i've read, doesn't work well in the LT1 intakes because of the elbow
thanks for the info though.
#7
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Resident
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tulsa, Ok
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think a 383 flows about 1200+ CFM and for true dual 2.5" i think it's some where around the 1200-1300 CFM range. I think your fne but if you went to 3" duals you'd be good to support 800HP
#10
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (60)
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Reading, PA
Posts: 1,547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From lt1engine.com...
A 2.75” (stock) single system is good for a 310hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” Single system is good for a 370hp engine with zero loss…
A 3.5” Single system is good for a 503hp engine with zero loss…
A 4” Single system is good for a 657hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.25” dual system is good for a 457hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…
So if your putting down 450 it looks like your fine with your current setup.
A 2.75” (stock) single system is good for a 310hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” Single system is good for a 370hp engine with zero loss…
A 3.5” Single system is good for a 503hp engine with zero loss…
A 4” Single system is good for a 657hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.25” dual system is good for a 457hp engine with zero loss…
A 2.5” dual system is good for a 513hp engine with zero loss…
A 3” dual system is good for a 812hp engine with zero loss…
So if your putting down 450 it looks like your fine with your current setup.
Last edited by InsaneAuto86; 06-16-2007 at 09:34 PM.
#15
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Phoenix/Tempe, AZ
Posts: 1,968
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah. on duals youre good with the 2.5, but if i were you id swap the 3" parts to 2.5
and i wouldnt think the big injectors would hurt you.. someone before said it was like having dual quad 600 cfm carbs.. but that sounds like more of a "too much air thing" (like running a 120mm TB or something )
idk, maybe its just me. im no expert though
and i wouldnt think the big injectors would hurt you.. someone before said it was like having dual quad 600 cfm carbs.. but that sounds like more of a "too much air thing" (like running a 120mm TB or something )
idk, maybe its just me. im no expert though
#16
TECH Addict
iTrader: (37)
Originally Posted by Irish350
yeah. on duals youre good with the 2.5, but if i were you id swap the 3" parts to 2.5
and i wouldnt think the big injectors would hurt you.. someone before said it was like having dual quad 600 cfm carbs.. but that sounds like more of a "too much air thing" (like running a 120mm TB or something )
idk, maybe its just me. im no expert though
and i wouldnt think the big injectors would hurt you.. someone before said it was like having dual quad 600 cfm carbs.. but that sounds like more of a "too much air thing" (like running a 120mm TB or something )
idk, maybe its just me. im no expert though