Chrome moly vrs "other"
09-16-2004, 02:49 AM
#1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orance County, CA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chrome moly vrs "other" Ok, been lookin at alot of mods that come in either chrome moly or non-chrome moly configs.
I want to know if theres any performance differance between these two, specifically when it comes to:
1. Pacesetter headers
2. Suspension mods (panhard, LCA, swaybar, etc)
Like what consequences do I run by opting for the non-chrome moly versions.
I want to know if theres any performance differance between these two, specifically when it comes to:
1. Pacesetter headers
2. Suspension mods (panhard, LCA, swaybar, etc)
Like what consequences do I run by opting for the non-chrome moly versions.
09-16-2004, 08:48 AM
#2
Teching In
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Out by the bridge again, TampaBay
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For suspension the chrome moly pieces will be a little lighter weight because the wall thickness of the tubing does not need to be as thick for the same strength as non-chrome moly pieces. Is the small reduction in weight worth the higher price? It's up to you.
09-17-2004, 04:58 AM
#5
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orance County, CA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
grrrrrr....i feel like such a dumbass...all ive been seeing for day is "chrome molly" this and "headers" that!! lol
I meant ceramic coated..screw it..i will start another thread asking this.
I meant ceramic coated..screw it..i will start another thread asking this.
