PCM Diagnostics & Tuning HP Tuners | Holley | Diablo
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Spark with KR help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2008, 11:08 AM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
02WS6FREEBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Spark with KR help

I am tuning with a AEM wide band and HPT and have been chasing KR the whole time I've been tuning, I have noticed that alot of the time a whole "string" seems to start with one cell and through the rest of the accelleration it stays.

I started out with a few more degrees of spark than in the stock table, which seems low in most places, and after looking at other tunes, people usually have more than in the stock table, and I have been removing spark chasing the KR and now most of my table is less than stock and I am still chasing it.

I am wondering if this is not false knock mabee caused by at least in part by the stall converter or mabee it needs the sensors replaced.

My car is a 2002 with only 20,000 mi. on the clock, could the sensors be bad or do they get more sensetive with time?

With picking up the KR, and it shows up on the scanner as such, even if it is false, is this messing up my tune via the VE that I have pretty much right on, "with more spark than I have now" and the MAF that is almost right on...is the spark KR messing up my tune of these tables?

My impressions of the car is it runs strong for the little that has been done to it, I don't hear and audiable knock, but the car is not quiet and it could be there and I just don't hear it.

Can someone help with what is going on and set me in the right direction?

Thanks..
Old 08-07-2008, 11:22 AM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (45)
 
Frost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 5,913
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

That low dur cam likely brings the DCR of the car up a good bit. You likely won't need so much timing. The best way to know what is real and what is not is to put some good gas in the car and see if the KR goes away. If it does; it's real.
Old 08-07-2008, 01:08 PM
  #3  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

There is a knock retard decay rate which you would
want to increase for tuning purposes, and an attack
you should decrease. This will let you see more, what
is going on rather than slam-and-hang.

You should look at what is precipitating the initial KR
hit. Look at the NBO2 sensor voltage and if you see
it bottom out right before the KR then it's a fueling
(airflow accuracy most likely) problem.

There is also false KR like from exhaust banging or
internal engine clatter, which you might have to
consider if the KR is not follwing from a "lean hole".
Old 08-07-2008, 03:06 PM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (33)
 
LS1-450's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Make sure that the knock software table that your using is the latter version, post 98. With the new sensors (post 98) the knock software GM used is less sensitive. Check tune archives to confirm. I had the problem you are having & this fixed the problem. However, I am using a 98 PCM & began w/ a stock 98 tune file. It's unlikely that your base tune is from a 98 file, but, wanted to note this just in case.
Old 08-07-2008, 11:48 PM
  #5  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
02WS6FREEBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by LS1-450
Make sure that the knock software table that your using is the latter version, post 98. With the new sensors (post 98) the knock software GM used is less sensitive. Check tune archives to confirm. I had the problem you are having & this fixed the problem. However, I am using a 98 PCM & began w/ a stock 98 tune file. It's unlikely that your base tune is from a 98 file, but, wanted to note this just in case.
My OS is stock, a 2002 OS and I the knock sensor settings are stock
Old 08-07-2008, 11:55 PM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
02WS6FREEBIRD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
There is a knock retard decay rate which you would
want to increase for tuning purposes, and an attack
you should decrease. This will let you see more, what
is going on rather than slam-and-hang.

You should look at what is precipitating the initial KR
hit. Look at the NBO2 sensor voltage and if you see
it bottom out right before the KR then it's a fueling
(airflow accuracy most likely) problem.

There is also false KR like from exhaust banging or
internal engine clatter, which you might have to
consider if the KR is not follwing from a "lean hole".
Jimmy,

what is the knock retard decay rate, is this one of the knock tables?

And I have my WB sensor in the LT bung for tuning the MAF for WOT, and I think this keeps the car in OL because it senses a 02 error...I believe,...could this be contributing to the KR?

And I was getting between 2*-4* in some cells and after removing 1* today it was less than 2* and only in a few cells.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:59 PM.