92 Mustang GT Supercharged on Ebay
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 2
From: Franklin Lakes, NJ
92 Mustang GT Supercharged on Ebay http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Ford-...spagenameZWDVW
listing it for a friend. he's on a local f-body forum and is selling this car. i want this car myself but can't afford it. just thought i'd spread the word. the pictures and the work on the car speak for itself. not to mention the places that worked on this car are both A+ shops. happy bidding
Jacob
listing it for a friend. he's on a local f-body forum and is selling this car. i want this car myself but can't afford it. just thought i'd spread the word. the pictures and the work on the car speak for itself. not to mention the places that worked on this car are both A+ shops. happy bidding
Jacob
Originally Posted by 560SL
445 whp is plenty in a light weight foxbody.
Originally Posted by qwik_ss
a friend of mine had a stock motor mustangcoupe 5.0 with turbo which made 505rwhp running 13.0 here at bandimere. But anyway it should be fast!!!
so a bone stock motor with a turbo picked up over 300 RWHP? most 5.0 cars dyno 180 RWHP or so stock.
and its nothing to pick up 50 RWHP with an agressive tune over a street tune. especialyl on race gas.
Originally Posted by qwik_ss
a friend of mine had a stock motor mustangcoupe 5.0 with turbo which made 505rwhp running 13.0 here at bandimere. But anyway it should be fast!!!
thats slow for that car. My bud has a 92 Notchback with a 331 and some out of the box afr's and a small cam, made 336rwhp and he runs 11.4s at 118 with a 5spd, and 4.10 gears, very minimal susp done. So at 505 rwhp that driver really sucks!! you should be able to granny lauch, granny shift taht car to low 12s. Oh I also know a guy with a 306 coupe stang forged bottom end 9.0 to 1 comp. with a novi 2000 making 530+rwhp running low 10s through an auto, but he has a little weight out and lots of susp.Dan
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 2
From: Franklin Lakes, NJ
i never had the pleasure of driving one of these fox bodies, but to put it in perspective, a friend of mine who is an LT1 owner says i would understand why people like them if i drove one. supposedly they put out alot of torque and are fun to whip around. i would love to drive one someday. these cars simply dont put out the numbers our LS1s can. granted, our motors have years of technology on those cars, its not a fair comparison. but for what they are, i think anything north of 400whp is pretty diesel
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them
Pouria Savadkouei
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Originally Posted by SLPSS99
thats slow for that car. My bud has a 92 Notchback with a 331 and some out of the box afr's and a small cam, made 336rwhp and he runs 11.4s at 118 with a 5spd, and 4.10 gears, very minimal susp done. So at 505 rwhp that driver really sucks!! you should be able to granny lauch, granny shift taht car to low 12s. Oh I also know a guy with a 306 coupe stang forged bottom end 9.0 to 1 comp. with a novi 2000 making 530+rwhp running low 10s through an auto, but he has a little weight out and lots of susp.Dan
Originally Posted by qwikz28
i never had the pleasure of driving one of these fox bodies, but to put it in perspective, a friend of mine who is an LT1 owner says i would understand why people like them if i drove one. supposedly they put out alot of torque and are fun to whip around. i would love to drive one someday. these cars simply dont put out the numbers our LS1s can. granted, our motors have years of technology on those cars, its not a fair comparison. but for what they are, i think anything north of 400whp is pretty diesel
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 2
From: Franklin Lakes, NJ
Originally Posted by qwik_ss
yeah there are pretty nice cars. as a matter of fact I have had 2 of them one was an 88 with t-tops which was stock and the other one was fully built. I dont know what people are talking about here I never said it was slow I said all that stuff and only a litttle over 400hp I would think it would have close to 500hp thats it. This aint a discussion forum so stop posting on it already. I rest my case
Thread Starter
TECH Addict
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 2
From: Franklin Lakes, NJ
the reason if because on my Mass air meter. it says 75mm in the link but thats my misprint its only 65mm so with a new bigger mass air meter and a better tune. its will put down close to 500rwhp. its also on a safe tune.
Originally Posted by qwikz28
why are you getting upset with me for? i made this thread for a friend, thats all. you don't like it then don't respond
-Ivan