1995ish Mustang GT vs LS1 Camaro SS
#2
Teching In
???
Wow! Did not expect that.
Did that come down to the driver in your opinion? Seemed like the stang got out on him but I figured the Camaro would of had enough to pull it back.
I have to say that street races do keep things real..LOL
Wow! Did not expect that.
Did that come down to the driver in your opinion? Seemed like the stang got out on him but I figured the Camaro would of had enough to pull it back.
I have to say that street races do keep things real..LOL
Trending Topics
#8
Teching In
#12
The car is pretty raggedy so maybe its not running correctly.
Let Big Hammer and the crew tell it, a ls1 with 3 or 4 coil wires off could beat a 2v
#13
Its a 4.6 so obviously he means it has a tune.
The camaro had manifolds on it still, a tune and some sort of exhaust. He was also about 280#'s and had a girl in the car with him.
#17
Clearly, the Mustang isn't a "95ish" either... unless someone REALLY likes 96-98 tail lights. That also means it's a 4.6L instead of a 5L... unless it's also had an engine replacement.
The SS has the disadvantage of being a vert and I guess it's because of the low lighting, but I can't even tell it's really an LS1 car.
The SS has the disadvantage of being a vert and I guess it's because of the low lighting, but I can't even tell it's really an LS1 car.
#18
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
The bigger factor, really... 94-95 came with the 302 and 96-04 got the 4.6L (all with the same body style). Of course, that changes the entire approach on how they're likely to run.