18x10.5 c5 zo6
#7
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the kind words PM me if your serious about wanting a set
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
sucks to run 295/35's in front and 315/30's on rear! Your front tire is .69" taller then your rear tires!!! Thats just not right LOL. They really need to start making 315/35r18s!!!!!!
#9
11 Second Club
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Posts: 636
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It doesn't suck at all I personal think it looks sick as hell... The difference is not noticable at all Ive had tons of people say it looks perfect... I sat the tires side by side and couldnt find any height difference when they were brand new....
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bossier city,LA barksdale AFB
Posts: 5,353
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
only reason it suck is your front tires are over half a inch taller then rear. I can tell in the pics by looking at the bigger sidewall on the front. Sucks that they don't make a 315/35r18 that would be sick!
295/35=26.13x11.61
315/30=25.44x12.40
315/35=26.68x12.40 That would be sick!! They need to make that size. That would make the rear .79 taller then front! If a tire is going to be taller then the other it needs to be the rear
295/35=26.13x11.61
315/30=25.44x12.40
315/35=26.68x12.40 That would be sick!! They need to make that size. That would make the rear .79 taller then front! If a tire is going to be taller then the other it needs to be the rear