May 27, 2016, 02:55 PM
Last edit by: IB Advertising
See related guides and technical advice from our community experts:
Browse all: Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird Tire Repair and Maintenance
- Camaro and Firebird How to Check Tire Tread<br>Step by step instructions for do-it-yourself repairs.
Browse all: Chevrolet Camaro or Pontiac Firebird Tire Repair and Maintenance
Front tire width
Thread Starter
Teching In
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: MD
Front tire width Im wondering why the front tires on my camaro are 275mm wide.
Why do F430's, M3's, IS-F's run 225's and my camaro has 275's?
I thought you'd want a wide front tire to maximize grip and minimize understeer.
Would my car handle better/worse/same with 245 tires in the front?
Thanks
Why do F430's, M3's, IS-F's run 225's and my camaro has 275's?
I thought you'd want a wide front tire to maximize grip and minimize understeer.
Would my car handle better/worse/same with 245 tires in the front?
Thanks
I think it comes down to your application and a balance of pros and cons. If you are worried more about straight line acceleration or are you more worried about traction while cornering? If the former, then a 275 is on the big side. If the latter, then a 275 is probably a good choice (look at formula 1 cars; they have massive front tires as well as rears). If you are looking for a little of both, then a 245 is probably a good choice.
For middle-engine cars, they got a lot less weight up front so they just don't need it. It's easier to drive (no tremlining) so that's the Lexus explanation. Bigger isn't always better. You want tires as big as your weight on them requires them to be. Otherwise you don't want them to be too big because that's too much air and rolling resistance. Few years ago GT1 or GT2 Vettes gained some laptimes at LeMans (extremely long straights) because they went to the smaller front tires.
Trending Topics
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Im wondering why the front tires on my camaro are 275mm wide.
Why do F430's, M3's, IS-F's run 225's and my camaro has 275's?
I thought you'd want a wide front tire to maximize grip and minimize understeer.
Would my car handle better/worse/same with 245 tires in the front?
Thanks
Why do F430's, M3's, IS-F's run 225's and my camaro has 275's?
I thought you'd want a wide front tire to maximize grip and minimize understeer.
Would my car handle better/worse/same with 245 tires in the front?
Thanks
2) Fronts do about 60-65% of the cornering work and 75%+ of the braking in a max performance stop on the Camaro. Bigger section = bigger footprint = more traction.
3) The LS1 Camaro needs the 275s on the rear for traction.
4) GM had no intention of having different front/rear wheels and tires on your Camaro.
5) 245s only on the front would increase understeer (push) and lengthen stopping distances in max situations. Not a wonderful idea in my book.
If you really wanted it to corner well and be better balanced on the track, you would increase the size of the fronts to 295 and leave the rears at 275. You might even go 315/275 on really tight tracks. It helps get the back end around.
You won't see a lot of Camaro racers go bigger on the fronts...but you may see it on those who win.
Jon
LS1 Tech Stories
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked
Pouria Savadkouei
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP
Verdad Gallardo
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes
Verdad Gallardo
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power
Verdad Gallardo
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die
Verdad Gallardo
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0
Brett Foote
10 Reasons the LS7 Is GM's Most Extreme Naturally Aspirated V8 Engine Ever
Verdad Gallardo
1) Over 55% of the Camaro's weight is on the front wheels, vs. closer to 42-45% on mid engine cars and 50% on M3. Tires are sized by weight they carry. A C5 Vette carries about 1600 lb. on the 245 fronts and your Camaro carries about 1900 lb. Do the math of M3, IS-F, etc.
2) Fronts do about 60-65% of the cornering work and 75%+ of the braking in a max performance stop on the Camaro. Bigger section = bigger footprint = more traction.
3) The LS1 Camaro needs the 275s on the rear for traction.
4) GM had no intention of having different front/rear wheels and tires on your Camaro.
5) 245s only on the front would increase understeer (push) and lengthen stopping distances in max situations. Not a wonderful idea in my book.
If you really wanted it to corner well and be better balanced on the track, you would increase the size of the fronts to 295 and leave the rears at 275. You might even go 315/275 on really tight tracks. It helps get the back end around.
You won't see a lot of Camaro racers go bigger on the fronts...but you may see it on those who win.
Jon
2) Fronts do about 60-65% of the cornering work and 75%+ of the braking in a max performance stop on the Camaro. Bigger section = bigger footprint = more traction.
3) The LS1 Camaro needs the 275s on the rear for traction.
4) GM had no intention of having different front/rear wheels and tires on your Camaro.
5) 245s only on the front would increase understeer (push) and lengthen stopping distances in max situations. Not a wonderful idea in my book.
If you really wanted it to corner well and be better balanced on the track, you would increase the size of the fronts to 295 and leave the rears at 275. You might even go 315/275 on really tight tracks. It helps get the back end around.
You won't see a lot of Camaro racers go bigger on the fronts...but you may see it on those who win.
Jon
Last edited by FASTFATBOY; Apr 27, 2011 at 08:13 PM.
Staging Lane
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 67
Likes: 1
From: Orlando, FL
Hey FASTFATBOY, please don't call the old girl goofy looking as she is very sensitive.
Size of the contact patch doesn't change with the size of the tire - only the shape. In a stock vehicle, there are lots of compromises made, and the marketing team gets far more say than they should - bigger isn't always better, but damn near 95% of the time, it sells more - right?? In a track car application, temps are far more important. LMP cars, for example, run 3 infrared temp sensors per tire so the engineers can constantly monitor tire temps. Tire width is more appropriately sized for the desired SHAPE of the contact patch, and the amount of heatshed ability you need for the given applied force.
TECH Fanatic
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Size of the contact patch doesn't change with the size of the tire - only the shape. In a stock vehicle, there are lots of compromises made, and the marketing team gets far more say than they should - bigger isn't always better, but damn near 95% of the time, it sells more - right?? In a track car application, temps are far more important. LMP cars, for example, run 3 infrared temp sensors per tire so the engineers can constantly monitor tire temps. Tire width is more appropriately sized for the desired SHAPE of the contact patch, and the amount of heatshed ability you need for the given applied force.
This applies if you have control over the tire's orientation to the tarmac. If rules restrict suspension geometry modifications, and wheel width and suspension springs and anti-roll bar(s), much of which happens in "Stock" racing classes, means that you have very little control of the tire's orientation. Controlling or maximizing the dynamic tire patch in this situatiion is the challenge.
The 4th Gen Camaro is a good example of the above, especially in Auto-X. Basically all suspension and wheels have to be stock with the exception of the front A/R bar, shocks and (racing) tire size. That basically means you can increase/decrease front roll couple. Period. Stock front camber curve sucks for racing at stock ride height and 1.0+ lateral G definitely moves the suspension.
Seeing a well setup Stock Class Camaro take a PAX win on a Go-Kart track might make some believers in out-of-the box thinking with tires, etc. It was the longest wheelbase, heaviest car running, but it won. Definitely an E-Ticket ride for a passenger. OK, most readers here probably are not old enough to have experienced Disney "E-tickets".
Sometimes getting creative with tire choices can help folks get around a track quicker.
Jon
Size of the contact patch doesn't change with the size of the tire - only the shape. In a stock vehicle, there are lots of compromises made, and the marketing team gets far more say than they should - bigger isn't always better, but damn near 95% of the time, it sells more - right?? In a track car application, temps are far more important. LMP cars, for example, run 3 infrared temp sensors per tire so the engineers can constantly monitor tire temps. Tire width is more appropriately sized for the desired SHAPE of the contact patch, and the amount of heatshed ability you need for the given applied force.
If that's the case why does an fbody get around the track quicker with a wider front tire? I understand there is a. point of diminishing returns but the car is quicker because there is more tire down on the ground for more turning load, ie more mechanical grip(when set up properly for more grip).
I disagree, you say a 235/55/16 on a 8 inch wheel has the same contact patch as 315/35/17 on an 11 inch wheel? Regardless of shape?
If that's the case why does an fbody get around the track quicker with a wider front tire? I understand there is a. point of diminishing returns but the car is quicker because there is more tire down on the ground for more turning load, ie more mechanical grip(when set up properly for more grip).
If that's the case why does an fbody get around the track quicker with a wider front tire? I understand there is a. point of diminishing returns but the car is quicker because there is more tire down on the ground for more turning load, ie more mechanical grip(when set up properly for more grip).
Nope. The larger tire is supporting the same amount of weight of the vehicle, therefore is applying the same amount of force upon the tire. Larger tire will yield less psi of pressure per unit area. Think about it with balloons. Think 2 balloons, one smaller, and one larger. With the same force applied to both balloons, which one will have the same area of contact patch to the table? (hint - the contact patches are equal area, different shape!)
And why faster around a track - lots of reasons. Heatshed, suspension geometry, springrate (and along with it, effective wheelrate), etc. Using different sized tires front to rear can alter the dynamics of the vehicle. The BMW E36 M3 is a great example. The '95 M3 had a square wheel setup, 235/40/17 all around on a 17x7.5" wheel. '96-'99 they changed the fronts to a 225/45/17, and the rears to a 235/40/17 on a 17x8.5" wheel. What did the later car do - understeer more.
If you choose not to believe me, here's a thread from bimmerforums with a couple of ALMS engineers (techno550, & steved033). Please, argue with the principles of physics with people WITH physics degree's who help win championships for major pro racing.
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?p=2667862
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?p=2667862
If you choose not to believe me, here's a thread from bimmerforums with a couple of ALMS engineers (techno550, & steved033). Please, argue with the principles of physics with people WITH physics degree's who help win championships for major pro racing.
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?p=2667862
http://forums.bimmerforums.com/forum....php?p=2667862
If this is the case why did Acura invest so much in ALMS cars to run a square tire setup front to rear and win with it? They developed an entirely new steering setup to run a square tire setup?
I could see what you are saying in a static state, but you run a 3900lb FRONT ENGINE car into turn 1 at Barber that has a split weight bias to the front as Mr Jon stated you WANT more tire on the front to help the push(understeer) these cars inherently have. Most cars have understeer built in from the their makers because it is safer.
Dont forget, when you start fooling with tires sizes you MUST fool with other suspension parts to take advantage of the tires. The game changes completely with a road course car when you start fooling around with bigger sizes and more grip.
Just a funny quip, Wally Dallenbach was asked at the Indycar race at Barber to explain understeer and oversteer to the tv audience.........
Wally said" Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car, understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car" I laughed my *** off.
The BMW is proving my point, the smaller tire on the front is causing the push.
If this is the case why did Acura invest so much in ALMS cars to run a square tire setup front to rear and win with it? They developed an entirely new steering setup to run a square tire setup?
I could see what you are saying in a static state, but you run a 3900lb FRONT ENGINE car into turn 1 at Barber that has a split weight bias to the front as Mr Jon stated you WANT more tire on the front to help the push(understeer) these cars inherently have. Most cars have understeer built in from the their makers because it is safer.
Dont forget, when you start fooling with tires sizes you MUST fool with other suspension parts to take advantage of the tires. The game changes completely with a road course car when you start fooling around with bigger sizes and more grip.
Just a funny quip, Wally Dallenbach was asked at the Indycar race at Barber to explain understeer and oversteer to the tv audience.........
Wally said" Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car, understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car" I laughed my *** off.
If this is the case why did Acura invest so much in ALMS cars to run a square tire setup front to rear and win with it? They developed an entirely new steering setup to run a square tire setup?
I could see what you are saying in a static state, but you run a 3900lb FRONT ENGINE car into turn 1 at Barber that has a split weight bias to the front as Mr Jon stated you WANT more tire on the front to help the push(understeer) these cars inherently have. Most cars have understeer built in from the their makers because it is safer.
Dont forget, when you start fooling with tires sizes you MUST fool with other suspension parts to take advantage of the tires. The game changes completely with a road course car when you start fooling around with bigger sizes and more grip.
Just a funny quip, Wally Dallenbach was asked at the Indycar race at Barber to explain understeer and oversteer to the tv audience.........
Wally said" Oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car, understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car" I laughed my *** off.
LOL, I've read that before. And I'm not trying to say that a smaller tire is better, or that bigger tires are bad. All I'm saying is that there is a 'right' size for every application, and simply saying wider is better is flat-out wrong. As well as stating that a bigger tire has a bigger contact patch, which is also wrong. With a given force applied, there is ALWAYS going to be the same area of contact patch to the road. Tire size is just going to determine the shape of that contact patch.
Same contact patch ?