Hot V N/A motor
https://www.hagerty.com/media/people...ized-screamer/
This subject came up recently in a Facebook post about the K48, and someone pointed out that fuel puddling in the intake tract is likely to be much bigger issue with hot-V than with conventional (cold-V?) engine designs. With conventional engines, gravity helps pull the fuel mist into the combustion chamber, whereas with hot-V gravity works against you.
That might be a non-issue with race cars since they run at high power (high air flow) much of the time. But for a street car that idles at stop signs and stop lights, there will be little airflow to help carry the fuel into the combustion chambers.
It's also something that head design can probably help with, for example if you keep the valve angle small and keep the intake ports relatively straight and angled downward as much as possible. But with convention engines it's pretty common to spray fuel on the back of the intake valve and use the intake stroke to blow it in, and with a conventional cylinder head (as in the K48) it seems likely that the fuel will flow backward along the intake walls at low throttle.
ECUs can compensate by modeling the growth and shrinkage of the fuel puddle (and they have to do that anyway with conventional engine design) but it seems like the hot-V design will make that both more challenging and more critical.
Gravity actually has some, but very little influence on air/fuel flow. The velocity itself is far greater an influence.
Trending Topics
Many flathead Ford V8s were reverse-flowed to get the exhaust ports out of the water jackets. Buddy Shay ran a V8-60 midget that was both reverse-flow and reverse rotation... and mounted in the chassis upside-down. Bruce Crower did a SBC for Indy with both the intake and exhaust ports on the outboard side of the heads.
Another tidbit:
Technical - Reverse Flow Flathead V8 | The H.A.M.B. (jalopyjournal.com)
Last edited by Old Buzzard; Apr 11, 2022 at 04:06 PM.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Gravity actually has some, but very little influence on air/fuel flow. The velocity itself is far greater an influence.
A couple years later I disabled it in my Subaru to see what would happen, and the car wanted to die instead of returning to idle, and when I gave it throttle it would sputter and die unless I pumped the pedal a bit. It turns out that getting the wall wetting compensation right is pretty important for getting a smooth transition to and from idle.
Smooth transitions to and from idle don't matter very much in race cars, and the drivers can just blip the throttle to deal with it. But for a street car, most people have higher standards, and getting that wall-wetting compensation right is pretty important.
I'm sure it can be done with hot-V intakes too, I just expect it to be rather unforgiving if it's not dialed in really well. With a convention design, the film on the wall will trickle down to the intake valves over time. With a hot-V I wonder if you just get a bigger puddle the longer you idle.










