Changed VE Table now i have a slight Hesitation!
I am actually out of the country now for the next few months, and don't have a car handy. If anyone here on this thread has the time, it would be interesting to see what the effect is. You could multiply the VE table by 300 from 2000rpm on up (to avoid starting issues). Log the RPM, TPS, MAF Raw, Maf Flow (G/sec), MAP, Avg BPW bank 1, Avg BPW bank 2, Spark Advance, Calculated Load, L-trims and S-trims. If a decent amount of logging is done this should be able to show any difference objectively.
Honestly I have tried this out on a LS1, though I will still be suprised if there is a difference (there definitely isn't on LT1's).
joel(Bink)
Chris,
This may be one of those "agree to disagree" things. I am very familiar with closed loop open loop, VE and the such, but I still stand by my original claim that the VE table is not completely ignored while the car is in closed loop.
There is an easy test for this. Mulitply your VE table by 300% and let me know how the car runs.....after you get it to start.
-Kevin
If this is the case, how would I lean out the idle in open-loop (cold-start)?
I still stand by my original claim that the VE table is not completely ignored while the car is in closed loop.
There is an easy test for this. Mulitply your VE table by 300% and let me know how the car runs.....after you get it to start.
-Kevin
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

joel(Bink)
1 in particular recently being larry01ss from Va. maybe you know of maybe not, but he dynoed 435 rwhp cam /heads on TEA's dyno before he ran at bowling green... a/f was almost dead on all the way across the board ...I knew there was disbelief about what VE truly is and the reason I posted here.. I'd love to see a ls1 run with just MAF and no VE that would be a trick.. what is speed density?,,,,load versus rpm scaled with a pulse width for a particular cell at a certain rpm...so we go to MAF this aids in calculating the airflow to arrive at actual airflow entering the engine ..hence MAF compliments a speed density fuel map or VE in laymans terms..by usuin multipliers to cover transitions in sudden airflow changes and more accurately determining total airflow.PE also covers transitions but uses change in kpa or load to cover light load transitions in fueling....basically every other sensor revolves around the VE table...the car will run with just VE,but it wont run with just MAF...
Or is it OK to lower them to deal with the hot start problem?
I have a hesitation at 2000 RPM with light throttle after messin with VE, which is why I have been paying attention to this post, but I only edited up to 1200RPM, so Im not sure that its the VE table. Is there some way the 2000 RPM area could be affected anyway?
Judging by the comments above, it does sound like the VE is used even in MAF mode, making the LS1 some sort of hybrid system. (*If* it works better though, who cares).
The questions then become
1) How is the VE utilized - is it effecting fueling only, or is there some change on timing.
2) Does it apply to transitional fueling, or steady state fueling, or both?
3) How are the numbers actually used? (The numbers in LS1 edit don't mean anything in and of them selves in any classic VE sense) - are they working like an accelerator pump shot.
4) If different modes are causing VE referencing, what are the parameters for these (e.g. is it a TPS threshold, operating all the time, etc).
I am still suprised that they seem to be referenced at times other than cranking, but if they are (as it sounds like), it will definitely be intersting to find out why, and what they are effecting. (The log files mentioned above would go a long way towards that
Since everyone seems to have tried it does anyone have any logs of those tests?)




