Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

How DA affects Compression?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 01:25 PM
  #41  
SScam68's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 3
From: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Default

Originally Posted by CamKing
Those books are flat-out wrong. A turbo engine doesn't require as much valve lift or exhaust duration as a NA engine. It also doesn't require as big of an intake port. A turbo engine also reqires a different exhaust profile then a Blower engine running the same amount of boost. I've been designing cams for Turbo race engines for over 20 years, Including the Buick Indy V6 project and Cosworth Indy cams for many teams including Penske. My father was a well know expert in Turbocharging and consulted for many of the F1 teams when they first went to Turbos. He's also written a few SAE papers on Tubocharging.
Oh???? Do you have the name of the papers? I would love to read them

I'm and engineer and science geek
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #42  
CamKing's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sscam68
Oh???? Do you have the name of the papers? I would love to read them

I'm and engineer and science geek
I have the original copies in a box somewhere around here.
Do you know if they can be looked up by author?
That may be easier.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 06:29 PM
  #43  
oneBADDz's Avatar
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Western Section
Default

Originally Posted by 98 Raptor TA
Looks like Texas is 2248 DA
Texas DA varies across the state drastically. In lubbock we raced at a DA of 5900 a few weeks ago
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 06:40 PM
  #44  
SScam68's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 3
From: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Default

Originally Posted by CamKing
I have the original copies in a box somewhere around here.
Do you know if they can be looked up by author?
That may be easier.
Author would be easiest
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 06:58 PM
  #45  
CamKing's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by sscam68
Author would be easiest
See what you can find under "Richard M Jones"
You could also check "Dick Jones" "Champion spark plug co"
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 07:48 PM
  #46  
BawlsZ28's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: In the garage
Default

Originally Posted by gun5l1ng3r
When you raise the compression on a motor that is at say 8000 ft DA, do you have to raise the octane accordingly? Or does the less dense air allow more compression before detonation?

For example a motor at sea level with 10:1 CR needs about 91 octane fuel. If you have a motor at 8,000 DA, could you raise the compression to 11.5:1 and still run 91?
Ya, I wish I would have gone w/more compression. I guess more boost may help me out in the mean time!!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 08:19 PM
  #47  
FieroZ34's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Those books are flat-out wrong. A turbo engine doesn't require as much valve lift or exhaust duration as a NA engine. It also doesn't require as big of an intake port. A turbo engine also reqires a different exhaust profile then a Blower engine running the same amount of boost.
To make the same amount of power as an average high-tuned N/A engine, you are correct, the turbo motor will make the same amount of power with smaller lifts, intakes, etc. But this is because even though the restrictions are more, it is still boosting it. You'd need to block CFM quite a bit to get the N/A motor to outperform the turbo motor. However in terms of max performance for forced induction, generally speaking the bigger the better. The bigger your intake ports, the shorter the runners, the bigger the valves and valve lift, the more power you'll make. It's all about CFM. Since acoustic tuning doesn't matter anymore, the only reason to use 'small' parts is for spooling faster, less lag, and faster timing.

Here in Colorado Springs the DA right now is around 9400ft. No wonder my car runs over 1.5 seconds slower than at sea level. Gas is 85, 87, and 91 for the ballas. Generally speaking for an average 14-16 sec car, the highest output engine (LS1 for a Z28), will feel like the base model engine up here (3.8l). Hard to imagine, but it sucks.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #48  
hammertime's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 2
From: Smithton, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Old SStroker
Let me rephrase the question:

What happens below about 18,000 mph to a craft launched from Earth?

What happens above about 24,000 mph to a craft launched from Earth?

Well, since no one else tried this one, it just occured to me what you were getting at: orbit velocity and escape velocity, right?
Not sure why that didn't come to me the first time I read it this morning.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #49  
CamKing's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FieroZ34
However in terms of max performance for forced induction, generally speaking the bigger the better. The bigger your intake ports, the shorter the runners, the bigger the valves and valve lift, the more power you'll make. It's all about CFM.
Nope.
The biggest mistake engine builders make is believing bigger is better.
The second biggest is looking at air in CFM. You need to look at it in Lbs/Hr.
You also need to look at pressure differentials on both sides of both valves. That is what makes Turbo engines so much different then NA and Blower engines.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 11:09 PM
  #50  
FieroZ34's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Originally Posted by CamKing
Nope.
The biggest mistake engine builders make is believing bigger is better.
The second biggest is looking at air in CFM. You need to look at it in Lbs/Hr.
You also need to look at pressure differentials on both sides of both valves. That is what makes Turbo engines so much different then NA and Blower engines.
I said generally, and it holds true for forced induction engines. Heads that flow 280cfm at .5 will make more max power than 225cfm at .5, max power on a forced induction motor, assuming head flow is higher throughout the lift range with the 280 heads. Yes, intake to exhaust ratios do change with forced induction, and this isn't to say you should have 2.02 intake AND exhaust valves, but generally speaking, and not defying common sense, bigger is better. More head flow, shorter and larger intake runners, etc. I didn't mention exhaust, as it still follows most of the rules of N/A, considering you still should keep it proportionate with the intake and dynamic compression ratios your getting, and bigger is better doesn't apply since the outgoing exhaust isn't under constant pressure, and you lose exhaust energy with heat. Also, intake plenum volume also doesn't follow the rule. The opposite is true so long as you don't lose intake flow, smaller is better (Less volume to fill).
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2006 | 11:25 PM
  #51  
CamKing's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FieroZ34
I said generally, and it holds true for forced induction engines.
You can not lump Turbo and Blower engines together. They are two different animals. The exhaust side of a turbo engine is nothing like an NA engine.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 12:18 AM
  #52  
FieroZ34's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Originally Posted by CamKing
You can not lump Turbo and Blower engines together. They are two different animals. The exhaust side of a turbo engine is nothing like an NA engine.
You can lump turbo and supercharged engines together on the intake side. The same doesn't hold true for exhaust obviously, as the S/C motor will tend to navigate more with a N/A, just with more exhaust gas to deal with.

The exhaust side of a turbo engine is very much like that of a N/A engine. The design is still very similiar. The only difference is that there is probably more exhaust gas on the FI motor. But equal lengh and scavaging still plays a big role in the design, just primary length takes a back seat because it is more critical to keep exhaust temperature high. The optimum turbo manifold is still equal length though.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:37 AM
  #53  
CamKing's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FieroZ34
The exhaust side of a turbo engine is very much like that of a N/A engine. The design is still very similiar.
Not in any form of racing I've seen.
NA engines don't have pressure differentials anywhere near that of a Turbo engine.

Think about what happens when you've got a turbo evacuating 8,000lbs/hr of exhaust, and the exhaust valve closes.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #54  
FieroZ34's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 634
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Default

Originally Posted by CamKing
Not in any form of racing I've seen.
NA engines don't have pressure differentials anywhere near that of a Turbo engine.

Think about what happens when you've got a turbo evacuating 8,000lbs/hr of exhaust, and the exhaust valve closes.
Of course they are going to be different sizes and flowing different amounts, that is again common sense. My point was that the overall design or the port and the manifold/headers are only slightly different than N/A, whereas on the intake side it is very much so different.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 11:51 AM
  #55  
SScam68's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 3
From: Albuquerque NM - The Land of 8000ft DA
Default

FieroZ34

You're arguing a point and physical phenomena that you don't completely understand yet.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #56  
cantdrv65's Avatar
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
From: TEXASS
Post

Originally Posted by Old SStroker
Let me rephrase the question:

What happens below about 18,000 mph to a craft launched from Earth?

What happens above about 24,000 mph to a craft launched from Earth?
Orbit and lost in space.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 06:56 AM
  #57  
Old SStroker's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 3
From: Upstate NY
Default

Originally Posted by cantdrv65
Orbit and lost in space.
Well put!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE