Advanced Engineering Tech For the more hardcore LS1TECH residents

Is there a Tie?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 02:49 PM
  #1  
LS1-Inside's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Lacey, WA
Default Is there a Tie?

I'm curious if there's a connection between stoichiometric AFR 14.7 and Atmospheric Pressure at sea level 14.7?

Any link between those two?

Thanks,
Dan
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:07 PM
  #2  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

I'm pretty sure it's a coincidence. You need 14.7 parts of air for every 1 part of gasoline, doesn't matter how close together(pressure) the air molecules are.

Anyone care to add anything else?
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:15 PM
  #3  
LS1-Inside's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Lacey, WA
Default

Originally Posted by 3.4camaro
I'm pretty sure it's a coincidence. You need 14.7 parts of air for every 1 part of gasoline, doesn't matter how close together(pressure) the air molecules are.

Anyone care to add anything else?
That was my initial thought too... trying to tie the ratio of Fuel & Air to the weight of Atmospheric pressure is boggling my mind! LOL

More input would be appreciated - i'd love to see someone bust out their PhD in Physics or something... LOL



Dan
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #4  
JohnnyC's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,135
Likes: 1
From: The 'Burgh, PA
Default

Purely coincidental; The pressure has units of pounds per square inch (psi) and the stoic 14.7 is a ratio of air and fuel masses. No relation. You could use 101 Kpa for your pressure units and you would still need a 14.7 AF mass ratio (use any mass unit that you want).

Pressure is force per unit area

Stoic A/F is a ratio of the mass of air to the mass of fuel

Last edited by JohnnyC; Oct 17, 2007 at 03:32 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #5  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

YAY I was right!
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 03:57 PM
  #6  
LS1-Inside's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Lacey, WA
Default

Originally Posted by JohnnyC
Purely coincidental; The pressure has units of pounds per square inch (psi) and the stoic 14.7 is a ratio of air and fuel masses. No relation. You could use 101 Kpa for your pressure units and you would still need a 14.7 AF mass ratio (use any mass unit that you want).

Pressure is force per unit area

Stoic A/F is a ratio of the mass of air to the mass of fuel
Great - cause thats what i told my friend who asked me... I figured they're completely unrelated units of measure, and there can't really be any tie there... but i figured I'd ask on here just to make sure... (He asked on his favorite forum too... heh curious to see what his fellow forum members say)

Thanks,
Dan
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 04:14 PM
  #7  
LS1-Inside's Avatar
Thread Starter
Staging Lane
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Lacey, WA
Default

Wait - isn't stoic impacted by altitude? (Atmospheric Pressure)

-Dan
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #8  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

No. But the amount of fuel you put in for a given volume will change. You still want the same RATIO, but maybe not the same AMOUNT.
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-2

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-5

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-9

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 06:10 PM
  #9  
gun5l1ng3r's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,017
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
Default

Originally Posted by LS1-Inside
Wait - isn't stoic impacted by altitude? (Atmospheric Pressure)

-Dan
No, stioch is not changed, ever. It is just the ideal perfect chemical ratio of air to fuel paticles. I don't think a combustion motor will ever have a perfect 14.7:1 ratio at all points in the combustion chamber. I could be wrong.

When you go up in altitude you A/F ratio goes down, but you would still ideally want 14.7:1 for perfect chemical mixing...
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 08:57 PM
  #10  
Manic Mechanic's Avatar
TECH Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 1
From: Magnolia, Texas
Default

Also different fuels, alcohol, nitro-methane, propane, etc. reach stoich at different ratios. The 14.7 is for standard Gasoline.

Vernon
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #11  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

what is standard gasoline today?
here in corripticut it's 10% ethanol, and that has a low AF ratio by itself so having gasoline with 10% of it has to make today's gas have a slightly lower A/F ratio than the traditional gasoline of old, however it may have been blended which yielded the 14.7 A/F?

just checked wikipedia, the more accurate stoich ratio is around 14.1. The number 14.7 is for "pure" gasoline containing n-heptane and iso-octane. All the oxygenates and other crap blended in like MTBE, ethanol, methanol, drive the stoich number downward.

Last edited by 1 FMF; Oct 17, 2007 at 09:40 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 07:12 AM
  #12  
'JustDreamin''s Avatar
TECH Resident
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD.
Default

1 FMF makes an interesting point....

We shouldn't be using 14.7 as stoich for all of these new blends of fuel...Because of the ethanol and everything else, the fuel suppliers (in response to legislation) has changed the stoich ratio.

If the stoich ratio for the "new" gasolines are around 14.1, where does peak power now occur? Is it still around the 12.5 range? Maybe lower? And where is peak economy now? Somewhere around 16.5 to 17 or so?

'JustDreamin'
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 08:30 AM
  #13  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

when narrowing in on peak power, the a/f ratio is less dependent on stoich than it is on combustion chamber and cylinder head design, at least that what the trend i've seen seems to be.
All the dyno results i've seen in chevy magazines tend to show A/F around 11:1 to 12:1 for the traditional carb'd 350, but when you look at the LS1/LSx's that tends to be higher at around 13:1. But peak economy on the other hand is always going to be the highest A/F ratio you can run without hurting anything, because all that amounts to is using as little fuel as possible. And I think it can be as high as 17:1 on the LS1 under favorable conditions, but usually around 15:1 I think, the guys in the tuning section would probably know.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #14  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

I thought anything over 15:1 on a LSX would cause major pinging and bad things. Heard this over in the tuning section.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 09:14 PM
  #15  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

pretty sure it would depend on engine load whether major pinging and bad things would happen. I'm going from memory, but I'm pretty sure that under light throttle, high vacuum, and light engine load the pcm under factory settings will run the engine with a high air/fuel ratio, in the neighborhood of 15 to 17. And it would make sense to do so since it would yield greater fuel economy and lower emissions. As soon as you increase throttle though or engine load increases, the PCM lowers the a/f ratio, and may reduce timing. I get the impression that aftermarket tuning is still in the medieval stages, so the reason bad things happen over 15:1 is probably their programming isn't 100% correct and the pcm isn't catching the right parameters to know when to add more fuel. Correct me if i'm wrong, but most aftermarket tuning is to correct for power adders and the goal of the tuning is max power and performance: when you stomp the pedal the car goes, and not so much light throttle cruising with high fuel mileage and low emissions.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2007 | 10:09 PM
  #16  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

I dont think tuners touch much of that stuff. Most of the things they mess with have to do with idle, VE, MAF, and PE ratio.

That doesn't really have anything to do with "when vacuum is this much, pull this much fuel" things that you're talking about.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #17  
1 FMF's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 2
From: CT
Default

and that's my point, they don't touch much of that stuff or know how to correctly and therefore bad things happen. things like idle, VE, PE and especially MAF are all interrelated. If you don't understand the algorithms using all that input, you're not going to handle all operating conditions of the motor anywhere near close to optimal.
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #18  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

I disagree.

The tuning of LSXs is getting all the sensors calibrated as accurately as possible, so the algorithms can do their job better. ex:

A stock tune on a stock car will work pretty well. Swap out some headers, and you've changed the VE at every rpm a LITTLE bit. This change to the VE is corrected by the fuel trims, but in order for the algorithms to work properly, you have to change the VE so the fuel trims get back to where they were.

A stock tune is something that will work ok for everybody, but won't work perfectly for anyone. It's designed to work ok in Alaska and in Florida and everywhere in between. Tuning is getting your tune working specifically in your area and weather conditions.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 04:05 PM
  #19  
hammertime's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,436
Likes: 2
From: Smithton, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 1 FMF
But peak economy on the other hand is always going to be the highest A/F ratio you can run without hurting anything, because all that amounts to is using as little fuel as possible. And I think it can be as high as 17:1 on the LS1 under favorable conditions, but usually around 15:1 I think, the guys in the tuning section would probably know.
IIRC, what you have described is known as lean-burn, and has been Illegal in the US for some time. Australia does allow for lean-burn, and it can be found in the PCM on GTO's, though I believe it is supposed to be locked.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2007 | 05:11 PM
  #20  
3.4camaro's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,203
Likes: 0
From: Galveston, TX
Default

Lean burn will make your NOx levels go through the roof, IIRC. When you go lean, the engine runs hotter, because there is no unburned fuel left to take heat out. When they get above 2500F, NOx will be created, which is sposed to be some nasty stuff for the environment.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 PM.

story-0
Amazing '71 Camaro Restomod Is Modern Muscle Car Under the Skin

Slideshow: This heavily modified 1971 Camaro mixes classic muscle car styling with a fifth-generation Camaro interior and modern LS3 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:06:42


VIEW MORE
story-1
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-2
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-4
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-5
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-6
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-7
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE