Is this anybodies? I want one!!
#21
TECH Regular
iTrader: (1)
Unfortunately, that isn't true. SLP did not own the rights to the "Firehawk" logo until August 13, 2008. This was made in June.
EDIT: And as far as I understand, that is just the application date and the USPO quotes the current status as:
I am not a lawyer and could be wrong, but that's how I see it.
EDIT: And as far as I understand, that is just the application date and the USPO quotes the current status as:
Current Status: Newly filed application, not yet assigned to an examining attorney.
Transformed into a National Application: No
Transformed into a National Application: No
#22
FormerVendor
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unfortunately, that isn't true. SLP did not own the rights to the "Firehawk" logo until August 13, 2008. This was made in June.
EDIT: And as far as I understand, that is just the application date and the USPO quotes the current status as:
I am not a lawyer and could be wrong, but that's how I see it.
EDIT: And as far as I understand, that is just the application date and the USPO quotes the current status as:
I am not a lawyer and could be wrong, but that's how I see it.
Last edited by dragonZ28; 10-19-2008 at 09:57 PM.
#23
SLP owns the script. Bridgestone/Firestone owns the bird logo. That's what I have been told by someone who owns one of those 2 businesses. Maybe SLP bought the logo or something, but it doesn't change the fact that someone owned it and currently does own it. I am 100% positive it isn't free domain - there is a trademark holder just like there is for 99% of the other things that guy makes.
#24
FormerVendor
iTrader: (32)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll stay out of this thread after this post, but making slight alterations does not make any less illegal. If it even closely resembles any trademarked logo, it is still considered infringement. Buyer beware - his shipping times are becoming longer and longer, and I promise it's not due to volume. Like I said earlier, I know that someone (I won't say names) has been issued letters of C&D and is completely ignoring them. This problem is growing underneath him, and he needs to heed the warning. If you get a C&D order, you had better stop and comply - ignoring them will not make them disappear. If that someone reads this, I suggest he take my advice and comply with their demands
#25
I'll stay out of this thread after this post, but making slight alterations does not make any less illegal. If it even closely resembles any trademarked logo, it is still considered infringement. Buyer beware - his shipping times are becoming longer and longer, and I promise it's not due to volume. Like I said earlier, I know that someone (I won't say names) has been issued letters of C&D and is completely ignoring them. This problem is growing underneath him, and he needs to heed the warning. If you get a C&D order, you had better stop and comply - ignoring them will not make them disappear. If that someone reads this, I suggest he take my advice and comply with their demands