2002 Camaro SS
I wouldn't recommend lowering the the rear from it's current height. In all three pictures, all on different terrain, the rear already appears to sit noticeably lower than the front. I suppose it could be sagging stock springs, but my '98 doesn't sit that low in the rear even being four years older and having 2k less miles.
Do you have a bunch of aftermarket audio components in the back, or is there a chance someone has already changed or cut the rear springs in the past? If there is additional weight causing it to sit low with stock springs, I'd be careful with replacement springs that drop height further unless you remove the weight.
I wouldn't recommend lowering the the rear from it's current height. In all three pictures, all on different terrain, the rear already appears to sit noticeably lower than the front. I suppose it could be sagging stock springs, but my '98 doesn't sit that low in the rear even being four years older and having 2k less miles.
Do you have a bunch of aftermarket audio components in the back, or is there a chance someone has already changed or cut the rear springs in the past? If there is additional weight causing it to sit low with stock springs, I'd be careful with replacement springs that drop height further unless you remove the weight.
I was thinking that it could be weak stock springs or possibly the aftermarket control arms combined with the relocation brackets. Would those have any affect on the ride height?
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
1) SS/Bowtie Grille
2) Strano/Koni combo
3) ZR1's 9.5/11 (biased)
4) Whistler headlights
Your 10 spokes can be made to look good. I had my spokes painted black with the lips polished on my old '87 LSx swapped IROC. They looked killer. You can add a ton of other suspension mods to make the car handle/look 10x better as well without effecting the look of the car. Just my 2 cents.









