345HP SS but how much Torque?
??? 
05-24-2007, 03:24 PM
#23
Using this:
http://www.dragtimes.com/horsepower-...lculate+Torque
and entering it at 5000 rpms (I inputed 313hp and kept playing with the RPM's untill it equaled J. Brown's 330lbs.) I got a flywheel torque rating of:
362.39 lb-ft
SO, I would put 360 lb-ft on the plaque and call it a day
If you want more accurate go to a friggin dyno....
http://www.dragtimes.com/horsepower-...lculate+Torque
and entering it at 5000 rpms (I inputed 313hp and kept playing with the RPM's untill it equaled J. Brown's 330lbs.) I got a flywheel torque rating of:
362.39 lb-ft
SO, I would put 360 lb-ft on the plaque and call it a day
If you want more accurate go to a friggin dyno....
05-24-2007, 03:34 PM
#24
I just read someone who said it was 345hp/345tq but that makes no sense...
Actually, this post should have been moved here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/special-edition-vehicles-30/
...a long time ago. Those guys will know, they drive the cars.
Actually, this post should have been moved here:
https://ls1tech.com/forums/special-edition-vehicles-30/
...a long time ago. Those guys will know, they drive the cars.
05-24-2007, 03:46 PM
#25
Just called SLP, they said it brought it up 20 lb-ft of torque but he (Joey) didn't remember what stock torque was that year....
I looked it up, it produced 340 lb-ft of torque add 20 lb-ft and it brings you to the previously mentioned rating of:
360 lb-ft
So there you go
.
I looked it up, it produced 340 lb-ft of torque add 20 lb-ft and it brings you to the previously mentioned rating of:
360 lb-ft
So there you go
.
05-24-2007, 04:03 PM
#26
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DEMONBIRD
Just called SLP, they said it brought it up 20 lb-ft of torque but he (Joey) didn't remember what stock torque was that year....
I looked it up, it produced 340 lb-ft of torque add 20 lb-ft and it brings you to the previously mentioned rating of:
360 lb-ft
So there you go.
I looked it up, it produced 340 lb-ft of torque add 20 lb-ft and it brings you to the previously mentioned rating of:
360 lb-ft
So there you go
.
05-25-2007, 09:13 AM
#28
TECH Enthusiast
Originally Posted by ls1owner4life
I searched Google and could not find factory torque rating. I see your dyno numbers in your sig. The 345HP SLP package I THINK is rated at the motor. Therefore, I would need to know torque at the motor instead of wheels.
Cliff note:
I want an accurate (Not 350 to 360ish) depiction of the factory SLP ratings for an appearance mod without having to spend $50+ for a dyno in addition to the $40 plaque.
Cliff note:
I want an accurate (Not 350 to 360ish) depiction of the factory SLP ratings for an appearance mod without having to spend $50+ for a dyno in addition to the $40 plaque.
well all factory rating are at the motor....
05-25-2007, 10:43 PM
#30
Originally Posted by DEMONBIRD
Just called SLP, they said it brought it up 20 lb-ft of torque but he (Joey) didn't remember what stock torque was that year....
I looked it up, it produced 340 lb-ft of torque add 20 lb-ft and it brings you to the previously mentioned rating of:
360 lb-ft
So there you go.
I looked it up, it produced 340 lb-ft of torque add 20 lb-ft and it brings you to the previously mentioned rating of:
360 lb-ft
So there you go
.
05-25-2007, 10:56 PM
#31
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Henderson, NC
Posts: 854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
wow.. ya know when they tested the motor that dash wasnt on the car 
Should maybe put the plaque on the motor or fuel rail cover or inatke or something that might have actually beenon the motor when they reported those numbers hehe
Should maybe put the plaque on the motor or fuel rail cover or inatke or something that might have actually beenon the motor when they reported those numbers hehe
05-27-2007, 02:21 PM
#33
Banned
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Longwood/UCF, Fl
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
aren't all the base LS1s rated 340-350 at the flywheel? GM just said that the LS1 F-bodies had less power so that they wouldn't **** off loyal vette owners that only know HP numbers and nothing else.
05-27-2007, 04:08 PM
#34
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Chesterfield,Va
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by DirtyBird222
aren't all the base LS1s rated 340-350 at the flywheel? GM just said that the LS1 F-bodies had less power so that they wouldn't **** off loyal vette owners that only know HP numbers and nothing else.
No some cars had extra SLP options that increased the power. Stock SS and WS6 cars are rated at 325hp. Some cars had the upgraded SLP exhaust and Blackwing airbox lid and which were 10hp each. Therefore some cars with both like mine were rated at 345hp.
05-30-2007, 08:36 PM
#35
Banned
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Longwood/UCF, Fl
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2QUIK4U
No some cars had extra SLP options that increased the power. Stock SS and WS6 cars are rated at 325hp. Some cars had the upgraded SLP exhaust and Blackwing airbox lid and which were 10hp each. Therefore some cars with both like mine were rated at 345hp.
