SS4000 users inside please.
Whats the STR on this particular converter?
What kind of times can I expect out of this converter?
What kind of gas mileage are you getting in town and on the highway?
Lastly, please list your track results from this converter and what you think of it overall.
Thanks a lot!
-Sly
You'll probably need to experiment on launch rpms to see what works best with your set-up. Start at 1000 rpm and experiment by raising your launch rpm by 500 and see how it goes. Keep doing it until you have hit maximum brake stall.
Highway gas mileage should be the same as a stock converter.
My PS4400 holds around 5300 rpm on the upshifts. Expect about 5000 rpm on the 4000 depending upon your shift points and torque curve.
Whats the average mileage on the highway with a stock converter? Again I dont know because I have no experience.
If my rev limiter is set at 6700 and I shift at 6500 to allow me enough time to shift the car before I hit the limiter, are my shift points going to change any when I convert? Should I set them the same or higher since the auto is going to be shifting faster than I am? Im going with a non-computer controlled tranny, so I dont know if its any faster or slower than one thats controlled by a computer. Thanks a lot for your input!
Trending Topics
Gas mileage is dependant upon many factors (gearing, cam, speed, etc). Just understand that on the highway the converter is locked and therefore doesn't impact your mileage.
You'll have to experiment on the shift points; it takes practice to shift an A4 as fast you can shift a manual. I'd get a shift light light just like an M6.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
What kind of times can I expect out of this converter? Anywhere between 13s and 8s...depending on setup and conditions.
What kind of gas mileage are you getting in town and on the highway? 23.5 on the HWY and I don't know in town.
Lastly, please list your track results from this converter and what you think of it overall. Check sig and do a search for the threads I've made about this converter and my track times as of late.
BTW, my shift extension shifting at roughly 6600-6700 is about 5200-5250 on the 1-2 and 5250-5300 on the 2-3 shift.
Just because I will be running a 4000 stall doesnt necessarily mean that I will be revving it that much at the track prior to launch? I know lots of factors will affect how far I will be able to rev up the engine before the brakes give. I want to do it just before it starts to roll according to your definition of maximum brake stall. So if that ends up being 2500 for instance, then how does the 4000 stall come into play? I will be running ET Streets if that makes any difference.
I always see people launching at different rpms with the same converters, how come different rpms work better for one person than it does the other? For some, hitting the gas off the line works better than brake stalling it and vise versa. How is this? You would think that the higher you get the engine speed, the harder its going to hit, the closer it is to its power range, and the quicker you get out of there, right?
Colonel: I wont have heads yet and I will be running a 3.42s, will the shift extensions be any different than yours?
Not enough to even consider. The 3.42s will raise the SE theoretically, and let me stress, ever so slightly but we're talking such a tiny difference that you wouldn't be able to tell. Same goes for having heads. They would increase the TQ a bit at the SE point but it wouldn't be a big enough change to worry about.
BTW, let the tranny do it's own shifting. It'll be faster, more consistent, and more reliable. All you need to do is set the shift points in the ballpark and let 'er rip.
Will the 200-4R shift any harder than the 4L60E? Faster? More accurate? I know that the gearing on these trannys are different, but if everything was identicle between 2 cars except 1 had the 200-4R and one had the 4L60E, how much of a difference is there going to be in numbers at the track? Will the 200-4R put down better numbers on the dyno since its a lighter tranny? Is it more efficient than the 4L60E? Sorry for all the questions. But I do appreciate everyones help so far.
200-R4s are extremely light and efficient. That much I do know abouth them.
Why the 200-R4 anyway?
You state that its lighter and more efficient, what kind of advantages is that going to have at the track and on the dyno? Oh and I talked to Mike himself to verify this info, and he said yes, even with all the best of the best parts out there, the 200-4R can be built stronger.
I have a Yank SS 4000E it stalls to 4100 rpm with my transbrake.
I put down 404 RWHP through the unlocked converter, TH400, Steel drive shaft and Moser 12 bolt. Not sure what my engine HP would be rated at.
For example, if you had lets say the same setup as me but your motor put out 380 RWHP the same converter would stall to maybe 3900 rpm and if you were making 600 RWHP it would stall to alot higher than 4100 rpm.
Lee
"If my rev limiter is set at 6700 and I shift at 6500 to allow me enough time to shift the car before I hit the limiter, are my shift points going to change any when I convert?"
I was actually referring to my manual tranny I currently have...if you read the end of the quote, I was then referring to the auto. Sorry for the confusion.
But yes, a 200R4 can be a major baddass setup for some all out trailor queen 8-9 second racing...but at that point you should be shifting manually, IMO.

