YANK 3600 vs. 3200 Advice
So I'm considering stepping down to a 3200:
Does anyone have input on how much the 60 will be affected?
Also will it go a bit faster as far as trap speed?
And finally how much easier will it be to hook up?
My best from last night was 11.39 @ 125 with a 1.87 60, so I'm having to really baby it out of the hole. If a 3200 would yield me even a 1.70 I would be happy, the 3600 has went 1.60's before but only when the moons are aligned.
I had hooking issues like you (conditions had to be perfect) until I started taking my MT's out to a closed road and seriously broiling them BEFORE I go to the track. Especially if they've been sitting for a while, just doing a burnout at the track is not enough to get them sticky.
You will definitely regret the change if you are looking maintain at least a 1.70 60 ft (on the motor). If still spraying the car out of the hole then youll find you wont hurt the 60ft and will likely go faster if you were having traction issues on a SS3600.
Ive ran dozens of both converters in my own and customers cars.
mid-11 to 12.0 type ls1 fbodies usually 60 ft from 1.75-1.80 at best on a SS3200 on the motor.
I dont think you will pickup mph going to the small converter on motor or spray.
My recommendation would be get a 15" rear wheel/tire combo (I'd go 15x8 with 275/50/15 MT drag radial) and the car will likely start 60 footing much more consistently.
Thanks for all the help, lots of good info here.
Trending Topics
My best ever 60ft with them was a 1.425 (last December when I ran my 9.950) and I'm regularly able to cut 1.46's with only a 1400RPM launch.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
My best ever 60ft with them was a 1.425 (last December when I ran my 9.950) and I'm regularly able to cut 1.46's with only a 1400RPM launch.
I learned a few things about the Hoosiers you might find helpful. The first is that you don't need a very long burnout with them. My 60fts started getting worse over time and it wasn't until I went through some of my scans (I log all my runs with HP Tuners) and compared them to my timeslips that I realized a longer burnout actually results in less traction. When I was cutting 1.46's again last week I would hit the throttle hard to get them spinning quickly and turn off the linelock to roll forward as soon as I saw smoke coming from both tires. I just looked at my last scan of the night and from the time I first hit the gas until I let up was less than 5 seconds (4.805 to be exact).
The other thing is to be sure and check the tire pressure before each and every run. Some people only check them once while cold but that's not the proper way to go about it since a good burnout can increase your tire pressure quite a bit or if the track starts getting cold, they can also lose quite a bit of pressure.
Good luck and be sure to post back how well they work.
Christopher
Hey to tell you the truth,Iv ran et street bias ply and et street radials up there last 2 times and I dont even need a burnout. I havent spun at all that I can tell so I just drive around the water box and go. Now after I get the stall that gonna be different and ill probly need a burnout.
Thanks for the advice Christopher,
Joe
Hey to tell you the truth,Iv ran et street bias ply and et street radials up there last 2 times and I dont even need a burnout. I havent spun at all that I can tell so I just drive around the water box and go. Now after I get the stall that gonna be different and ill probly need a burnout.
Thanks for the advice Christopher,
Joe
The other thing I just remembered was the importance of staging as shallow as possible as I've made back to back runs in the same car (only minutes apart) and saw almost a full tenth difference in the ETs. In case you're not familiar with what I'm talking about, it involves lighting the first bulb and then inching the car along until you just barely get the second one to light up. Here's an example of what it looks like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIa3L5mxLko
No problem at all, glad to help.
Christopher
The other thing I just remembered was the importance of staging as shallow as possible as I've made back to back runs in the same car (only minutes apart) and saw almost a full tenth difference in the ETs. In case you're not familiar with what I'm talking about, it involves lighting the first bulb and then inching the car along until you just barely get the second one to light up. Here's an example of what it looks like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIa3L5mxLko
No problem at all, glad to help.
Christopher
Wow I had no idea about shallow staging! I will deff try it tomoro night. Problem with me is I get impatient to get the the lights lit. A full tenth is huge wow. Probly wouldnt be a tenth with my car but im sure it will help. Even if it would help to get me the .074 I need for 12s would be great. Thanks again guys ill be sure to post results on thursday
The other thing I just remembered was the importance of staging as shallow as possible as I've made back to back runs in the same car (only minutes apart) and saw almost a full tenth difference in the ETs. In case you're not familiar with what I'm talking about, it involves lighting the first bulb and then inching the car along until you just barely get the second one to light up. Here's an example of what it looks like:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIa3L5mxLko
No problem at all, glad to help.
Christopher







