ET difference between 4l60 to 4l80
I'm really beginning to think about a swap from a t56 to an auto in my 02 Z28. My car is currently just a bolt-on car and I probably won't do too much to this car since it's my DD and I already have a racecar, but I still like to have fun and sometimes take it to the track.
Because my curiosity gets the best of me, what is the ET difference between similarly setup 4l60/4l80's? I just wonder because of the slight weight difference and possible parasitic losses?
Thanks,
Josh
I'm really beginning to think about a swap from a t56 to an auto in my 02 Z28. My car is currently just a bolt-on car and I probably won't do too much to this car since it's my DD and I already have a racecar, but I still like to have fun and sometimes take it to the track.
Because my curiosity gets the best of me, what is the ET difference between similarly setup 4l60/4l80's? I just wonder because of the slight weight difference and possible parasitic losses?
Thanks,
Josh
GENERALLY,
A 4L60E should ET better in a lower power or heavier combo because of the additional gearing in low, assuming the converter gives decent shift extension.
A 4L80E should be more consistant to hook and ET better in big power cars.
The only downside to going auto lol assuming zero changes other than the transmission itself...
going from a t56 to a 4l60 with a 3600 ish stall... you can expect as much as 4 to 5 tenths decrease in time...
going from a 4l60 to a 4l80 with no changes you can expect to see an additional 1 to 2 tenths
this comes from a friend of mine who actually did the swap.
Trending Topics
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
I considered the tighter ratio 4L60E gears available from PATC which they claim will reduce the ET by 2 or 3 tenths. However, the gears alone are $1150, and you have to rebuild the trans AND you still end up with only a marginally-strong 4L60E.
While I believe their lower ET claim, I'll save the money for a 4L80E instead.
Just my thoughts; I look forward to more experienced opinions.
I dont see how that is possible. When we swapped out C6Z from a 6 speed it was making 965rwhp. After we swapped the 4L80 in it made 830rwhp and went 8.81 at 154 like that.
I would expect to see 20-40 HP, but not 135. You will always show loss through an unlocked converter, but typically the torque multiplication will more than make up for it on the track. However with a locked converter you don't have much more HP consumption happening, your running the pump, and a small amount of loss due to rotating weight but that is more dependent on the rate of acceleration.
It is not a static number.
HP loss due to rotating weight is MOSTLY dependent on the rate of acceleration. The faster the acceleration the more the power loss. So an 8 second car will suffer more losses out of any transmission than a 12 second car.
It also varies depending on who built the unit somewhat. We do several mods to reduce parasitic losses on the units we build.








