Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1/4 mile E.T. difference between 4L80E vs 4L60e?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 11:26 PM
  #1  
floman's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 1
From: Bridge City,Tx
Default 1/4 mile E.T. difference between 4L80E vs 4L60e?

I recently purchased a 98 SS Camaro with a LS3 conversion that is somewhere in the 450 rwhp range and about 600rwhp on 150 shot. Car currently has a Century built 4L60E tranny w/3600 Circle D converter, Moser 12 Bolt w/4.10 gears & 275-60-15" M/T Drag radials. Car is full weight non stripped down car. Has supposedly run 11.21 @121mph with approx 1.57 60ft. on motor and no times for nitrous runs.

Tranny acted goofy a few days ago and I'm afraid its on its way out

I really dont want to put money into another 4L60E, so I am looking into doing a 4L80E conversion. I know on motor only its probably overkill, but with 600rwhp on the nitrous I feel its a worthy conversion. I would rather do it once and do it right if it wont totally kill the cars performance.

My question is: How much 1/4 mile ET diff am I going to see changing over to the 4L80E with the different gearing of the tranny and heavier rotating mass, assuming the same stall speed & STR on the converter? Any of you guys have real world comparisons? I realize I will probably lose some performance, but hopefully gain a whole lot of reliability.

1) Approx ET loss?
2) 60ft loss?

Last edited by floman; Jan 2, 2013 at 12:09 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 07:43 AM
  #2  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

If you don't plan to do much more modding I'd say a well built 60 could handle what you are throwing at it. As for your original question, it may be difficult to answer but hopefully someone has some direct back to back info for you.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 01:25 PM
  #3  
floman's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 1
From: Bridge City,Tx
Default

This was already a stage 3 build from Century Transmission around Houston, the guy I bought the car from had a receipt for $2800.00. I just hate to throw more money at it and have the same problem in the near future. I have seen and heard of too many 4L60Es biting the dust.

Thought if the 4L80E wont kill the car too bad, it would be money well spent. If I need to I can get the converter for the 4L80E a little looser to help make up any 60ft loss and hopefully not blow through it too bad on the nitrous hit?

Anybody with real world comparisons would care to shed some light on the subject? I don't want to go backwards, but I don't want to keep fighting problems either. I don't have the funds to keep building 4L60s, that's why I say do it once and hopefully be done for quite a while.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2013 | 05:20 PM
  #4  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 529
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

This thread covered the topic pretty well:

https://ls1tech.com/forums/automatic...ile-times.html

Note that some people reported quicker ETs with the 4l80e due to its tighter gear spacing.
The additional 30 lbs makes little difference in a 3000+ lb car.
(According to Jake the difference is that small without the converter.)

The additional 10 lbs of rotating mass is also minor, about the same as the difference between a steel and aluminum drive shaft. Perhaps a 5 HP loss due to higher internal friction.

Perhaps better to compare the ET difference between the 4L80E and a 4L60E that blows at launch - about 3 weeks.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 03:21 AM
  #5  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
The additional 10 lbs of rotating mass is also minor, about the same as the difference between a steel and aluminum drive shaft. Perhaps a 5 HP loss due to higher internal friction.
You completely pulled that pile of crap out of your ***. You can't just make up laws of physics dude
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 04:00 AM
  #6  
itsslow98's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 6,762
Likes: 5
From: Maryland
Default

I bet with a 4l80 and transbrake leaving on the bottle the car would go LOW 10s maybe high 9s. If your not doing a transbrake id have someone like FLT build the 4l60.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 08:16 AM
  #7  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 529
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
You completely pulled that pile of crap out of your ***. You can't just make up laws of physics dude
Partly true but it reflects the opinions of many others from the numerous previous threads that have discussed the differences between 4l60e and 4l80e. I mostly wanted to counteract the incorrect "huge penalty" reputation that some people have of the 4l80e.
I also recall seeing dyno numbers from someone who made the swap with no other changes and they were 5 HP down.
Its been a long time since I was in school, but I learned physics well enough on my own to get advanced placement credit at UofMich and then took a bunch of college physics courses for the fun of it.

I certainly defer to your much greater experience...
Are you suggesting the losses are higher or lower?
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 08:30 AM
  #8  
carlsonauto's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 168
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
You completely pulled that pile of crap out of your ***. You can't just make up laws of physics dude
Pulled from his *** or not he was trying to say that the difference is going to be minimal between the two as far as power loss and he is absolutely correct. As much as I am a fan of using the lightest parts as much as possible the ET difference between the two as far as weight will be minimal if any. As stated the gear ratio may indeed help ET....
Reply
LS1 Tech Stories

The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time

story-0

6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-1

Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

 
story-4

Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

 
story-8

10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

 Brett Foote
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 01:21 PM
  #9  
floman's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 1
From: Bridge City,Tx
Default

Keep it coming guys. I would love to hear and see about some real world experiences. I'm pretty sure this is the direction I am going.Just need to sell a few more parts to help fund the project. If anybody needs something please feel free to check out my for sale ad.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 01:25 PM
  #10  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
Are you suggesting the losses are higher or lower?
Well now, it's all relative to what we are talking about. There is no "set" loss amount other then the weight penalty which is constant.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 05:24 PM
  #11  
RonSSNova's Avatar
8 Second Club
10 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 814
From: Portland, OR
Default

The overall gear ratio in first is 12.54 with the 4L60E.
With the 4l80E it will be 10.16.

So theoretically, you will lose in 60ft.
You could change the rear gear, but you would have to change it a lot to get back to the same overall ratio in 1st. Then you may run out of gear at the finish line.

You can leave the gear the same, but add more converter.

Short of someone posting real world experience, I think it's a try it and see and live with the consequences.

BTW, as you know, it's tough to have a converter that works both on and off the bottle. You have to compromise in one direction or the other.

Ron
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2013 | 09:54 PM
  #12  
poorhousenext's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 2
From: TN
Default

I don't know squat about about HP loss due to weight, so what about RPM lost and retention between shifts effect on ET. Could the 4L80 have the edge in 1/4 by it's gearing doing a better job of keeping the engine higher in power band between shifts.

4l65/70
3.06
1.62 -- 52.94% (high) RPM Retention 47.06% RPM DROP
1.00 -- 61.73% (high) RPM Retention 38.27% RPM DROP

4l80/85
2.48
1.48 -- 59.68% (high) RPM Retention 40.32% RPM DROP
1.00 -- 67.57% (high) RPM Retention 32.43% RPM DROP
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 06:01 AM
  #13  
floman's Avatar
Thread Starter
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 1
From: Bridge City,Tx
Default

Originally Posted by RonSSNova
The overall gear ratio in first is 12.54 with the 4L60E.
With the 4l80E it will be 10.16.

So theoretically, you will lose in 60ft.
You could change the rear gear, but you would have to change it a lot to get back to the same overall ratio in 1st. Then you may run out of gear at the finish line.

You can leave the gear the same, but add more converter.

Short of someone posting real world experience, I think it's a try it and see and live with the consequences.

BTW, as you know, it's tough to have a converter that works both on and off the bottle. You have to compromise in one direction or the other.



Ron

Yeah, I have to agree with all of your statements. I did a little calculating at work night before last and came up with the same gear mutiplications that you stated.To have the same overall gearing(as the 4L60 has with 4.10s) with the 4L80 (I would need 4:88s to match 1st gear multiplication, and 4.56 s to match 2nd gear multiplication) and finally things equal out in 3rd gear. The only advantage of the 4L80s gearing is that each gear change has less of a drop in rpm.

Guess I could buy a 4L80 with a brake and slam it outa the hole on the spray and make up the difference

Its a tough decision, I guess most of the guys doing the 4L80s are big power adder guys that dont need the gearing that the 4L60s add to the overall equation. Maybe I just need a BIG TURBO pull out the slack.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 09:26 AM
  #14  
bmf5150's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
Default

I would go 4l80
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 09:41 AM
  #15  
poorhousenext's Avatar
11 Second Club
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 317
Likes: 2
From: TN
Default

Originally Posted by floman
Yeah, I have to agree with all of your statements. I did a little calculating at work night before last and came up with the same gear mutiplications that you stated.To have the same overall gearing(as the 4L60 has with 4.10s) with the 4L80 (I would need 4:88s to match 1st gear multiplication, and 4.56 s to match 2nd gear multiplication) and finally things equal out in 3rd gear. The only advantage of the 4L80s gearing is that each gear change has less of a drop in rpm.

Guess I could buy a 4L80 with a brake and slam it outa the hole on the spray and make up the difference

Its a tough decision, I guess most of the guys doing the 4L80s are big power adder guys that dont need the gearing that the 4L60s add to the overall equation. Maybe I just need a BIG TURBO pull out the slack.
You need to take into consideration gear blow thru 4L60 Vs 4L80. Gear blow thru is lenght of time engine will be a lower gear before it's shifts to the next gear thus losing the mechancal advantage of gear.

So blow thru 1st quicker, your in 2nd, while competion still has mechanical advantage of it taller 1st to help it engine continue down track farther, 2nd same, now trans shifts into 1:1 gear where competitions higher gear ratio 1st and 2nd still has advantage of engine having the mechanical advantage of 2nd gear farther down the track to help accelerate cars weight.

Lets just call 4L60 lower 1st and 2nd a washout or maybe a disadvantage if you again take into consideration RPM lost between shifts that the engine has to pull thru that 4L80 doesn't have to.

Model 4L60 with 3.70 rear gear, 3000 stall, 430HP LS3 in 4t gen camaro base weight 3700 lbs. Don't have a model of same combination with 4L80E. If I did we might be able to see advantage or disavantage of lower 1st and 2nd gear and their effects on 1/4 time and mph.

Attached Thumbnails 1/4 mile E.T. difference between 4L80E vs 4L60e?-4l60egraph.jpg   1/4 mile E.T. difference between 4L80E vs 4L60e?-4l60egraph.jpg   1/4 mile E.T. difference between 4L80E vs 4L60e?-4l60egraph.jpg  

Last edited by poorhousenext; Jan 4, 2013 at 10:35 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 11:45 AM
  #16  
Smo's04Gto's Avatar
Launching!
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: NJ/AZ
Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
You completely pulled that pile of crap out of your ***. You can't just make up laws of physics dude
See post 2 and 3 some great info , by one on the best tuners in the country.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/automatic...mony-faqs.html
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2013 | 12:28 PM
  #17  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,323
Likes: 529
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Thanks for finding the link to the dyno comparison. I certainly remember reading it, but could not find it during my search. I thought I remembered the dyno difference as 5 HP, but it is actually 5 ft/lbs for the peak (about 1%). Due to minor test differences the author estimated somewhere between a 5 to 15HP loss.
So as not to be (somewhat correctly) accused of pulling something out of my rear, I will not venture a guess where the loss comes from, but suggest it simply be accepted as a fact.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2013 | 01:57 AM
  #18  
01ssreda4's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (96)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 89
From: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Default

Originally Posted by Smo's04Gto
See post 2 and 3 some great info , by one on the best tuners in the country.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/automatic...mony-faqs.html
I appreciate any intelligent leads, whether they agree or disagree with myself. While your link provided interesting data, still close to impossible to lock this down to a T. And the loss IS revolving. Meaning it will be different in every car. It will never stay constant, which just adds to the complexity of the question. I only commented towards him because it was someone making blanket statements based on his imagination, which is just plain silly
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:30 PM.

story-0
6 Common C5 Corvette Failures and What's Involved In Repairing Them

Slideshow: From wobbling harmonic balancers to failed EBCMs, these are the issues that define long-term C5 ownership and what repairs typically involve.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-05-07 18:44:57


VIEW MORE
story-1
Retro Modern Bandit Pontiac Trans AM Comes With Burt Reynolds' Autograph

Slideshow: A modern Camaro transformed into a retro icon, this limited-run "Bandit" build blends nostalgia with brute force in a way few revivals manage.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:57:02


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Greatest Cadillac V Series Performance Models Ever, Ranked

Slideshow: Cadillac didn't just crash the high-performance luxury vehicle party, it showed up loud, supercharged, and occasionally a little unhinged...

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-04-16 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Powerful Chevy Trucks Ever Made!

Slideshow: Top ten most powerful Chevy trucks ever made

By | 2026-03-25 09:22:26


VIEW MORE
story-4
Hennessey's New Supercharged Silverado ZR2 Has 700 HP

Slideshow: Hennessey has turned the Silverado ZR2 into a 700-hp off-road monster with supercharged V8 power and a limited production run.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-24 18:57:52


VIEW MORE
story-5
Coachbuilt N2A Anteros Is an LS2-Powered C6 Corvette In Italian Clothes

Slideshow: A one-off sports car that looks like a vintage Italian exotic-but hides a C6 Corvette underneath-just sold for the price of a new mid-engine Corvette.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-23 18:53:41


VIEW MORE
story-6
Awesome K5 Blazer Restomod Comes With C7 Corvette Power

Slideshow: A heavily reworked 1972 K5 Blazer swaps its off-road roots for a low-slung street-focused build with modern V8 power.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-09 18:08:45


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Camaros You Should Never Buy

Slideshow: There are thousands of used Camaros on the market but we think you should avoid these 10

By | 2026-02-17 17:09:30


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 LS Engine Myths That Refuse to Die

Slideshows: Which one of these myths do you believe?

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-01-28 18:10:11


VIEW MORE
story-9
Five Reasons the Camaro Was the Most Pivotal Player in the Pony Car Wars 2.0

The world was a better place when it was still around.

By Brett Foote | 2026-01-23 09:20:37


VIEW MORE