3rd accumulator delete ? 4l60e
I have spoken to a dozen+ performance trans builders and none has ever mentioned deleting/blocking this check ball. The purpose for this check ball, and those in the pump and input housing, is to bleed off air so that the hydraulic fluid can apply solidly. (Perhaps a bad analogy, but think of air in your hydraulic brakes.)
When considering any mod to the trans, I also ask "why didn't GM do this"? Often it is to make a soft shifting trans for many applications; other times to save a few dollars. I think GM had a good reason to add the cost of this check valve.
1. The check ball in the input shaft can be removed as suggested (but questioned by the OP).
2. I don't have the experience to say whether blocking the 3rd accumulator check ball is a good idea. Any pros here have comments on that?
3. The Alto Red frictions were popular when that thread was written 5 years ago, but have not held up well. However, I use the Red frictions for the forward and overrun clutches.
4. Nice that the Transgo separator plate and various Sonnax parts were recommended. That still is true today.
here's another post from another forum, its a good read
Sorry, but I just don't have the experience or information on whether blocking the 3rd accumulator check ball is currently considered a good idea.
Trending Topics
Perhaps you mean the Sonnax servo release check valve, part # 77701-076 and only $12. Yes, I am many others (including the last link you posted) recommend this.
BTW, the part number for the check ball is ACDelco #8634400, just a few dollars at the dealer. It is a bit tricky to install though.
And you are welcome - I learned from the links you posted and from my research while answering your questions.
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
It could be done, and it may solve some issues with 3-4 clutch pack failures, but it would be a big undertaking.
It could be done, and it may solve some issues with 3-4 clutch pack failures, but it would be a big undertaking.
It will completely change everything we know about orifice sizing for 3rd feed, etc.
You would release the band with a heavier spring on the servo.
It's commonly done on C4's with aftermarket valve bodies. It is also similar to many transbrakes on a TH400 where 2nd gear oil isn't used on the backside of the low servo, so release is done by the spring only.
Part of the issue with the 2-3 shift on the 4L60 series units (as Frank well knows so I'm posting for the benefit of others) is that on a 2-3 shift MOST of the oil to make the shift is used to release the servo, and while that is happening, simultaneously, the 3-4 clutches are being engaged.
The 3-4 apply piston area is too small and the 3-4 clutch friction area is also borderline, but combined with the apply oil getting robbed to release the servo, it's hard to make it work at elevated HP levels.
You can cheat the apply and friction area with more pressure to a point.
Eliminating 3rd oil from releasing the servo would allow all the oil to instantly go to apply the 3-4 clutches and what we've seen on other units where we eliminating accumulators is that we had to reduce orifice sizing a HUGE amount to keep the shifts from being too harsh. It would be the same on the 4L60E.
If I did more 4L60E's I would spend the time on development to do this but ultimately it's not my market and I have other projects in the works.
Back to the OP's earlier posts, I think when those links say to "plug the accumulator" they only meant the tiny bleed hole. I don't see much value to that, especially when the 3rd feed hole is enlarged. In other words, those links are NOT saying to disable the entire 3rd accumulator, just clogging the 1/100" bleed hole.









