Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rare 4l60e?? I'm confused. .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 05:11 PM
  #21  
Dynamic396's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 189
Likes: 12
From: Newman Lake, WA
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
The last pic shows a Vortec (LS) truck engine. According to Dynamic396 this could have come with the 298mm trans shown in the pics.
I may have to correct my posts - I get the "Vortec" engines mixed up because GM used that term for both LT and LS engines.
No... The 298 mm converters were used behind the 5.7 Vortec and LT engines. The LS's all used 300 mm converters with the deeper bell housings. The Tahoes and Suburbans didn't get the LS engines until '01.

The 5.7 Vortec truck engines were built with the classic Gen I V-8 platform. These used 298 mm converters with the shallow bell housings from '98-on. The earlier '96 and '97's 5.7 Vortecs used the one-piece truck "K" cases.

The LT's were the Gen II small-blocks; LT1, LT4 (and the "baby LT"; the 4.3 V-8). These were in the Corvettes, F-bodies and B-bodies. Reverse-flow cooling systems, Opti-Spark ignition, etc. They were said to be a "proof-of-concept" platform for some of what we now see in the LS engines. The LT's used 298 mm converters with the one-piece truck "K" cases, but with the outer ears cut off for exhaust clearance.

The LS's were, well.... the LS's. They all used the 300 mm converters and deeper bell housings with the bolt at the top, since GM removed the top bolt on the passenger side due to the #8 cylinder bore being so close.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 05:47 PM
  #22  
Circle-D's Avatar
FormerVendor
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,474
Likes: 14
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by chevyjunkie62
With that being said I thought they all had the same input shafts..


That is definitely a 4L60 LT setup that will use the 298mm style converter. Some late 4L60 LT did have the removable bellhousing. If this is definitely going on an LS engine, then we will need some stuff to adapt the OE converter over. If you are getting one built, then you can add all the adapters into the converter so it fits the OE flexplate. You could also go back to the junkyard and get a 4L60 LS and make the swap easier.

Chris
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 05:55 PM
  #23  
chevyjunkie62's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Circle-D
That is definitely a 4L60 LT setup that will use the 298mm style converter. Some late 4L60 LT did have the removable bellhousing. If this is definitely going on an LS engine, then we will need some stuff to adapt the OE converter over. If you are getting one built, then you can add all the adapters into the converter so it fits the OE flexplate. You could also go back to the junkyard and get a 4L60 LS and make the swap easier.

Chris
The more I read and research the more I'm leaning towards just getting a 4l60e ls
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 08:20 PM
  #24  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,322
Likes: 528
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Dynamic396
No... The 298 mm converters were used behind the 5.7 Vortec and LT engines. The LS's all used 300 mm converters with the deeper bell housings. The Tahoes and Suburbans didn't get the LS engines until '01.

The 5.7 Vortec truck engines were built with the classic Gen I V-8 platform. These used 298 mm converters with the shallow bell housings from '98-on. The earlier '96 and '97's 5.7 Vortecs used the one-piece truck "K" cases.

The LT's were the Gen II small-blocks; LT1, LT4 (and the "baby LT"; the 4.3 V-8). These were in the Corvettes, F-bodies and B-bodies. Reverse-flow cooling systems, Opti-Spark ignition, etc. They were said to be a "proof-of-concept" platform for some of what we now see in the LS engines. The LT's used 298 mm converters with the one-piece truck "K" cases, but with the outer ears cut off for exhaust clearance.

The LS's were, well.... the LS's. They all used the 300 mm converters and deeper bell housings with the bolt at the top, since GM removed the top bolt on the passenger side due to the #8 cylinder bore being so close.
Good. That is what I thought and have been posting for years.

Can you see the picture in post #16 which the OP says is what he bought?
It is clearly an LS engine, yet has the Vortec cover. Unless I am missing something obvious, I am dumbfounded how this LS engine could have a 298mm trans on it from the factory. I'm back to thinking that someone at the YJ bolted the incompatible trans to it.
Then the OP's statement that the included converter worked perfectly on someone else's '04 Tahoe (would that also be an LS by '04?).
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 10:01 PM
  #25  
chevyjunkie62's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
Good. That is what I thought and have been posting for years.

Can you see the picture in post #16 which the OP says is what he bought?
It is clearly an LS engine, yet has the Vortec cover. Unless I am missing something obvious, I am dumbfounded how this LS engine could have a 298mm trans on it from the factory. I'm back to thinking that someone at the YJ bolted the incompatible trans to it.
Then the OP's statement that the included converter worked perfectly on someone else's '04 Tahoe (would that also be an LS by '04?).
It was actually the stall converter I bought from tci that fit on his 04 tahoe.Which was listed on summit racing as fitting 00-06 only. This engine/trans combo was completely bolted together with factory converter in place. Didn't look like it had been tampered with at all. I'm still puzzled about that part.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 10:03 PM
  #26  
chevyjunkie62's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Either way I'm sure I can make it work. Really wish I wouldn't have tossed out the converter that was in it when I got the new one that way I could have compared it to others but I didn't plan on having this issue of course.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 11:07 PM
  #27  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,322
Likes: 528
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by chevyjunkie62
It was actually the stall converter I bought from tci that fit on his 04 tahoe.Which was listed on summit racing as fitting 00-06 only. This engine/trans combo was completely bolted together with factory converter in place. Didn't look like it had been tampered with at all. I'm still puzzled about that part.
Sorry about the confusion on my part. I'm posting in 3 forums and forgot the earlier details.
I am also puzzled and therefore should stop guessing.
Obviously getting a true LS style trans is your best bet.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 10:01 AM
  #28  
Dynamic396's Avatar
On The Tree
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 189
Likes: 12
From: Newman Lake, WA
Default

Originally Posted by mrvedit
Good. That is what I thought and have been posting for years.

Can you see the picture in post #16 which the OP says is what he bought?
It is clearly an LS engine, yet has the Vortec cover. Unless I am missing something obvious, I am dumbfounded how this LS engine could have a 298mm trans on it from the factory. I'm back to thinking that someone at the YJ bolted the incompatible trans to it.
Then the OP's statement that the included converter worked perfectly on someone else's '04 Tahoe (would that also be an LS by '04?).
GM has called their truck engines "Vortec" since '96. The later 5.7's were Vortecs, as well as the later on with the LS engines. It's just a moniker...

No LS engines came from the factory with 298 mm converters or supporting equipment (bell housing, stator support, input shaft, etc.). They were all 300 mm.

I would venture to say that someone at the wrecking yard bolted an early transmission to this LS engine. They will bolt right up, minus one bell housing bolt. The bolt pattern at the flex plate is different, though.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 10:37 AM
  #29  
mrvedit's Avatar
Moderator
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,322
Likes: 528
From: Ann Arbor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Dynamic396
...
...
I would venture to say that someone at the wrecking yard bolted an early transmission to this LS engine. They will bolt right up, minus one bell housing bolt. The bolt pattern at the flex plate is different, though.
I'm glad that Dynamic has come to the same conclusion.
If a converter was bolted to the flexplate, it was likely the stock "LS" style.
A 298mm input shaft will physically fit into an LS converter, but will not actually engage/work. Hence the YJ could do that and you wouldn't notice.
The only other possibility is, as mentioned before, a working LS engine and LT trans from a previous owner that made them work together. But certainly not from the factory.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 10:52 AM
  #30  
chevyjunkie62's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for all the input guys. Definitely helped me figure this out
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 04:20 PM
  #31  
bbond105's Avatar
TECH Junkie
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 713
From: Poplarville, MS
Default

I would not buy a TCI torque converter. It will not hold up and Summit Racing and TCI will not warranty it. Also when it goes out it will take your trans with it.

Last edited by mrvedit; Feb 17, 2016 at 05:20 PM. Reason: Typo
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2016 | 06:38 PM
  #32  
chevyjunkie62's Avatar
Thread Starter
Teching In
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Talked to the yard and they did put it together from different vehicles there so that solves it. Trying to work out an exchange.
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:27 PM.