Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Stall too small?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
nine8ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default Stall too small?

I am currently running a 228r cam with a yank 3000 stall. One of my lifters let go and ate up my cam. I figured that now would be a good time to up my cam a bit into the 23x/23x range. If I was to keep the 3000 stall in, what would my driveability be like?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 02:23 PM
  #2  
Docrocket1967's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 4
From: Tampa
Default

Whats the lift and the lsa on the other cam?
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 02:46 PM
  #3  
nine8ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Current cam is 228/228 on 112
Possible new cam is 232/234 on 112
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 10:43 PM
  #4  
RevGTO's Avatar
Pontiacerator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,216
Likes: 236
From: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Default

Driveability will be good but you'll be missing the performance potential offered by a (physically) smaller, lighter and higher stalling converter. Your new cam is going to push your powerband even higher into the rpm range. You'll want a converter that will slip up into that range faster for optimal performance.

Like I said, I believe your current converter will drive fine, but you'll be leaving a lot on the table that could be had with 3600-4000 stall.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2017 | 10:59 PM
  #5  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,605
Likes: 2,509
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
Driveability will be good but you'll be missing the performance potential offered by a (physically) smaller, lighter and higher stalling converter. Your new cam is going to push your powerband even higher into the rpm range. You'll want a converter that will slip up into that range faster for optimal performance.

Like I said, I believe your current converter will drive fine, but you'll be leaving a lot on the table that could be had with 3600-4000 stall.
Excellent advice. I agree on all counts.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 08:45 AM
  #6  
Docrocket1967's Avatar
TECH Resident
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 767
Likes: 4
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by nine8ss
Current cam is 228/228 on 112
Possible new cam is 232/234 on 112
If this is a car that you plan on driving on the street and enjoying more than racing and tearin up the street I would leave it just how it is, stall wise.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 12:20 PM
  #7  
nine8ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Yea, this is my DD that may only see the track once or twice a year.

Would a 110 LSA help bring the powerband back down into my current stall territory?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 12:37 PM
  #8  
FirstYrLS1Z's Avatar
TECH Veteran
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Active Streak: 30 Days
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 145
From: Euclid,Ohio
Default

to OP,what's your rearend ratio ?
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 12:39 PM
  #9  
nine8ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Rear end is 3.42
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 01:00 PM
  #10  
thunderstruck507's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 8,358
Likes: 27
From: Northwest AR
Default

You have very little to gain performance wise without increasing the converter. IMO replace the cam so you don't have to retune and enjoy.

Increasing the cam size without increasing the already nearly too small converter has more chance of negative drivability or performance.

You might gain 10hp in the top end if you're lucky. More likely it would be less than that.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 01:18 PM
  #11  
fst100's Avatar
TECH Fanatic
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 24
From: lancaster, pa
Default

I ran a similar cam to what you're planning on running 232/238 and had a 3200 stall with a 3.73 in the rear (see sig). drivability was decent but like other mentioned I left a lot on the table running a low stall. before I sold it was planning on getting it re-stalled with a 3600. with the stall at 3600 it would be right in the middle between DD and track. my next build i'll be going with a 3600 stall as I should had from the get-go.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 02:50 PM
  #12  
nine8ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Thanks guys. I will grab another 228r unless I can talk the wife out of another stall.

Appreciate the help
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2017 | 06:04 PM
  #13  
TXZ28LS1's Avatar
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,163
Likes: 3
From: Classified
Default

If your spending the money on new parts, i would definitelty opt for a bigger stall and cam.

i would honestly step up to a 4000 stall and that 232/234 cam. Easily, easily daily driver setup man.

my old setup was a 230 cam, and 3200 stall. Drove great.

sold that car, and the setup i run now is TSP 233/239 and circle D 5c 4000 converter. It drives just as smooth as my old setup.

This is about as aggressive as i would go.. car is just a daily driver street car.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 12:30 AM
  #14  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

I drove my car to work 40 mins in traffic. Had a 234/242 111 and a loose 4000 (looser than that 5C) with just 323s.

Wouldn't recommend that. Not with a wake the dead exhaust combo.

However, when I swapped to a 227/244 115 and 373s with the same stall... car was immensely more enjoyable on the street. It did give up some top end performance.

So I would recommend, throwing more gear at the car, going to a 4C from CircleD (3600) and then going with a different cam. I think a 230/234 114+2 would be a good cam. I had that one for a while too. PatG spec'd it with EPS lobes and Cam Motion cut it. I'd recommend that as a slight step up without killing drivability.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 02:31 AM
  #15  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,605
Likes: 2,509
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Default

I wouldn't worry about a gear swap at this point. OP stated he already has 3.42s so a swap to 3.73 isn't worth the cost and hassle IMO, unless he's planning a new rear anyway.

Better to address that inadequate stall speed first. Bump it to 3600-4000, make sure to go with a high quality unit for best driveability, and you'll reap excellent performance gains with no appreciable loss of driveability if sticking with a cam that's close to previous specs.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 08:35 AM
  #16  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

Missed where he said 3.42s. Looked in his sig. Assumed 2.73s or 3.23s.

3.42s and an SS3600 or 4C would be a good combo with a cam similar to what I said.

Or you could do it 230/234 112+2 and it'd be a little more rowdy but still enjoyable.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2017 | 04:16 PM
  #17  
nine8ss's Avatar
Thread Starter
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 253
Likes: 2
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Rear end is actually 3.23. A new rear is in the future as I do not know how much longer this stock 10 bolt will last.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2017 | 09:35 PM
  #18  
RevGTO's Avatar
Pontiacerator
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,216
Likes: 236
From: Wichita KS / Rancho San Diego
Default

3.23's are good to go IMO. There's no perceptible difference between them and 3.42's and even going to 3.73's isn't going to get you much.

And that rear just may surprise you with how long it lasts ...
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2017 | 10:49 PM
  #19  
RPM WS6's Avatar
LS1Tech Administrator
20 Year Member
Shutterbug
Community Builder
Community Influencer
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 34,605
Likes: 2,509
From: Schiller Park, ILL Member: #317
Default

Originally Posted by RevGTO
3.23's are good to go IMO. There's no perceptible difference between them and 3.42's and even going to 3.73's isn't going to get you much.

And that rear just may surprise you with how long it lasts ...
Agreed again.

To the OP, although I agree with RevGTO about the fact that your stock rear might surprise you with its longevity, I personally wouldn't recommend spending money on a gear swap if you're planning on a new rear regardless.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 09:26 PM
  #20  
JakeFusion's Avatar
Super Hulk Smash
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,258
Likes: 146
From: Pace, FL
Default

I just put money in the 10-bolt. If setup right, there's no reason it won't last behind an automatic. I've had mine behind a heads/cam car and drag radials for 3 years. And it has 146k miles on it. But new ring and pinion this year with ARP cap studs and a TA girdle. Little things to help.

Also, doing a looser stall with a lower STR will not hit the tires as hard. My 4000 has a 2.2 STR and is softer which is good for bracket racing or street digs. It still hits them hard as hell. But not as hard as a 2.7 or 2.8 STR would. And that helps soften the blow to the rearend too.
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.