Effect of RPM's on a 4L60E
this is my opinion.
Recently I was leaning more towards the manual 4-3 being worse than the auto 4-2/4-1 (based on wear to the overrun clutches), but I dunno anymore.
It'd be nice to get a final conclusion on that. Maybe get all the top trans builders on here to fight it out till we get the best answer.

Either way I guess I'll probably end up sticking with the no-load manual downshift to 3rd prior to WOT just because the 3-1 or 3-2 downshift feels less sloppy.
i don't think we will ever know the correct answer to this question. i've heard from sooo many people on these boards the 4-2 downshift is so bad for the 4L60E and downshifting 1 gear at a time is so much safer than downshifting 2 gears. i will take my chances downshifting into 3. most trans builders say the 4L60E's problem lies in overdrive. i don't wanna put any heavy power through it.
Use 3rd and keep on trucking. We were testing parts that are common place now.Last edited by ChocoTaco369; Oct 3, 2006 at 11:47 PM.
But I do agree that it's probably a good idea to give it a very small amount of throttle (just enough to maintain current speed) if you're at highway speeds when going manually from OD to 3rd, to avoid engine-braking). At speeds under 45-50mph though, it probably doesn't matter much as the rpm change will be very small.
3rd does not lock IIRC
The Best V8 Stories One Small Block at Time
Does not lock in drive.
If you rode in my car you would know exactly when its locked and when its not. It is a night and day difference in feel, and sound, which is nothing like a stock car that you can barely notice.
Will we ever get a FINAL ANSWER?!?!
The arguements are just too good on both sides......
Originally Posted by James B.
A 4 to 2 downshift is easier for a 4L60-E to do than a 3-2 downshift. It is a single event of disengaging the 3-4 clutch pack. Downshifting from 3 to 2 has to release the 3-4 clutch pack and engage the band at the same time. Keep in mind that mechanically the 4L60-E is only a 2-speed auto with overdrive.
If the 4-2 is preferred over the 3-2, then why would the 3-1 be preferred over the 4-1?
Furthermore, if you're already in OD at the time, but at a speed where it would/will go back to 1st (like at 35mph in a 2.73 geared car), then you'd have to shift manually back to 3rd first, then go WOT to allow the auto downshift from 3-1.
So which is better?
1) Manual 4-3 under no load, then auto 3-1 at WOT
or
2) Auto 4-1 at WOT?
If the 4-2 is preferred over the 3-2, then why would the 3-1 be preferred over the 4-1?
Furthermore, if you're already in OD at the time, but at a speed where it would/will go back to 1st (like at 35mph in a 2.73 geared car), then you'd have to shift manually back to 3rd first, then go WOT to allow the auto downshift from 3-1.
So which is better?
1) Manual 4-3 under no load, then auto 3-1 at WOT
or
2) Auto 4-1 at WOT?








