Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2.2 STR vs. 2.5 STR

Old 11-15-2007, 05:18 PM
  #1  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default 2.2 STR vs. 2.5 STR

In general what seems to be the difference in efficiency up top between converters with these two STR's? I have 330rwhp so Im just curious how much hp up top I would be losing with going with a converter such as a Yank SS3600 with 2.5 STR versus a SS3200 with 2.2 STR or would the difference be minimal? Kinda stuck because I want the higher stall speed and shift extension for the track but more rwhp for racing on the street but if the difference is minimal I'd go with the bigger converter hands down.

Also...anyone know the STR of a Vigilante 3200 converter?

Last edited by StealthFormula; 11-15-2007 at 05:30 PM.
Old 11-15-2007, 08:26 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
DeltaT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You need to set it up so you can lock up the converter under WOT, then you can have the best of both worlds.

Most of the Vigilantes are 2.5STR from what Jack told me the other day when I ordered a 5-disc lockup.

Jim
Old 11-15-2007, 09:27 PM
  #3  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
99Hawk262's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Little Rock
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The higher shift extension of the SS3600 would offset any loss due to the higher STR compared to the SS3200 IMO. Higher STR doesn't always mean it's going to be slower from a highway roll either. My old SS4000 with a 2.6 STR pulled okay from a highway roll, but my current PT4400 with a 2.5 STR pulls so much harder at the same speed. It is significantly faster from a roll now. I would attribute that to the higher shift extension and the fact that it flashes so much higher when you hit the throttle. Either way, the difference between the two was night and day. I'll never go back from a PT series now. And it still hits hard at the track. That's the best of both worlds IMO.
Old 11-15-2007, 10:06 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DeltaT
You need to set it up so you can lock up the converter under WOT, then you can have the best of both worlds.

Most of the Vigilantes are 2.5STR from what Jack told me the other day when I ordered a 5-disc lockup.

Jim
what exactly would that do for me?
Old 11-19-2007, 08:48 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
Thread Starter
iTrader: (35)
 
StealthFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Skippack, PA
Posts: 4,798
Received 54 Likes on 50 Posts

Default

ttt could someone explain about locking up the converter under WOT?
Old 11-21-2007, 10:09 AM
  #6  
11 Second Club
 
Rays C5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Va. beach,Va
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I 've seen guys do it when dynoing for higher hp numbers but imo the clutches in a converter for lockup won't handle too many wot runs for long.
Old 11-21-2007, 10:22 AM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 99Hawk262
The higher shift extension of the SS3600 would offset any loss due to the higher STR compared to the SS3200 IMO. Higher STR doesn't always mean it's going to be slower from a highway roll either.
Yup. The SS3600 is going to be faster from a roll than the 3200.
Old 11-21-2007, 03:00 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (1)
 
radz282003's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Tree-Hugging, Bug eating CALI'
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Regarding the STR I can tell you than my SS3800 dyno's 40 RWHP lower than when locked. My 3800 has a 2.55 (I think) and a shift extension of about 5300-5400 on 3.23s. I think you should go with a SS4000 (since it looks like you're interested in the SS-series) because you'll likely only wished you'd gone bigger after driving around in that small stall after a while. My brother was running easy 12.2s with intake, exhaust, 3.73s, SS4000, and a tune in bad weather. I think his best 60' was around 1.65 or something. I've run similar 1.6Xs with manifolds with my SS3800 so I don't think you'd be unhappy.
Old 11-21-2007, 05:14 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Ragtop 99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 9,491
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by radz282003
Regarding the STR I can tell you than my SS3800 dyno's 40 RWHP lower than when locked. My 3800 has a 2.55 (I think) and a shift extension of about 5300-5400 on 3.23s.
Unless you are well over 400 rwhp locked, a loss of 40 rwhp seems excessive. Have you discussed this with Yank?
Old 11-21-2007, 09:05 PM
  #10  
Dan
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Buellton CA
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I gained 25hp when locking the Vig3800..To answer the ?, I think there would be a big difference between 2.2 & 2.5str..I posted in another section about this..I had a vig3800 2.5str & went 12.21@110 1.66 60', switched to a Yank SS4000 2.6str..went 12.06@110 1.59 60' same track, same conditions, same mods..The 2.6 hits like a **** out of the hole.
Old 11-22-2007, 08:09 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Omega Doom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DFW,TX
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

so...... I wonder where the PE 4200 with it's 2.7 STR fall's in this match up?


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2.2 STR vs. 2.5 STR



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 PM.