Automatic Transmission 2-Speed thru 10-Speed GM Autos | Converters | Shift Kits
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Got my car back after ss3600 install. OMG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #21  
T/A_GuS's Avatar
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hell'sChariot
huh, I have an ss4000 and the stock 3.23 gears and Im between 23-2500rpm in traffic. Why did you get 3.73s, they have to hurt you more than help. Especially highway mileage.

Well i got the gears before the stall...so thats why, and about mileage, its not my DD, so its not really a concern for me
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #22  
99T/AMAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
Default

same with mive, it is not a daily driver and insted of puting gears in the weak *** 10 bolt i will just buy a 12- bolt and sell my rear while its still good. All in all i am very happy with the stall even with the shitty 2.73's and can't wait to get the headers on and the tune done to see what it is going to do at the track. Any guesss from anyone??

Last edited by 99T/AMAN; Apr 13, 2008 at 10:27 PM. Reason: forgot stuff
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2008 | 11:31 PM
  #23  
RooRnZ28's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
From: Central California
Default

any stall + 2.73's = BIG difference.... i put in a 3000, and it sure woke the car up!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 07:44 AM
  #24  
99T/AMAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
Default

yeah you engine brake it to 2,000 rpms then mash the gas and it still was spinning the et streets on the street from a take off. it is great
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 11:17 AM
  #25  
Mikzgp's Avatar
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: JC Missouri
Default

Originally Posted by 99Hawk262
Got me....for bolt-on, H/C cars anything less than 3500 is a waste. For FI or big nitrous cars, obviously smaller is gonna be the way to go.
Dumb guestion, But why is that on FI? sorry to highjack
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 11:58 AM
  #26  
z28_YOU_HO's Avatar
12 Second Club
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,526
Likes: 5
From: O-town FL
Default

Put a TCI 3500 In my car didnt need to be tuned at all...i did mess around with the shift points though with my programmer
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #27  
99T/AMAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
11 Second Club
15 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
From: Simpsonville, SC
Default

i think cause they make power at lower rpm's so you miss out on the lower rpm power. just a guess
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 12:19 PM
  #28  
chrs1313's Avatar
10 Second Club
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,703
Likes: 13
Default

3.73s are over rated unless u have 2.73s...keep the 3.23s if you are an A4...look at my times for proof...
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 02:50 PM
  #29  
Camaro396's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,091
Likes: 7
From: Toledo, Oh
Default

Good to hear. I am pulling my trans tonight to install my vig4400, and 4.10s later in the week. I cant wait!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2008 | 03:02 PM
  #30  
MemphisZ28's Avatar
Launching!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Default

my tt3000 runs hard!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 09:41 PM
  #31  
99Hawk262's Avatar
11 Second Club
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 1
From: Little Rock
Default

Originally Posted by Kenny H
Absolutely incorrect. A few years back I had a '98 Formula that had a smaller cam than what you are running (T1) with the restrictive stock '98 manifolds, stock 3.23 gears, and a Vig 2800 and bolt-ons. The vig 2800 flashed to about 3100 and the car ran a best of 11.98 @ 113 MPH with a 1.64 short time. And that was before LS1 edit was out for '98s so that was on an Ed Wright mail order tune.

So exactly what 'potential' did I leave? Was it the .01 difference in our short times or the .05 difference in 1/4 mile ET? Keep in mind you are running more cam, you have headers which at that time I did not, and your Yank 4400 vs my Vig 2800.

While I do agree on a well prepped track the Yank 4k+ convertors will out perform a smaller vig, it certainly is not the night and day difference you make it out to be. I later ran a custom Yank 4200 thruster along with Macs and the car went 11.83 @ 115+ with actually a worse 60 ft. I'm sure it would have ETed a bit better if I could have gotten that combo to work but the Yank hit the tires too hard for a stockish suspension and my 26 x 11.5 x 16 ET streets. To get the full potential out of the Yank 4k+ thruster convertors one would definately have to work on the suspension a bit. Also, on street tires the car was pointless. Many will enjoy the greater drivability of the smaller convertors as well.

The biggest advantage the larger Yank has is from a roll. At 40 MPH with the Vig 2800 that car was a turd. The Yank hit MUCH harder and usually broke the tires loose wildly. The Yanks sure 'felt' faster but the track said otherwise. Had I been able to get the full potential out of the Yank and cut low 1.5s I'm sure the car would have gone 11.6s @ 116 MPH. But that never happened as shoddy track prep is very unforgiving to 4k+ stalls.
You don't prove me wrong at all, or change my opinion. Like I said, it's simply my opinion that anything less than 3500 is a waste. And that was aimed more for street driving since that's what I do with my car 95% of the time. There are also many factors that need to be considered when comparing our times. I've only run my car three times and 11.93 happens to be the best so far. I truly believe I can knock it down at least a couple tenths with better conditions. You were trapping 115+ and I'm hanging around high 112's and low 113's so you have an advantage somewhere. What did your car weigh? My three runs were with 3/4 tank of gas and lots of crap in the back seat (a shade over 3700 pounds). There are several people on this board running mid 11's with very similar setups to me and a little less weight (~3500). I'm not saying my car will do that, but I know it will do better than 11.90's.

You asked what potential you left with the smaller converter? You answered your own question in your last paragraph......low 1.5's and 11.60's with better track prep. One of my biggest reasons for upgrading to the PT4400 was because so many members told me they gained so much over their smaller converters. Also, the only night and day difference I've ever talked about is the difference between my SS4000 and my PT4400. The difference between those two is exactly as I've made it out to be. I've never said there was a night and day difference between a small Vig and a big Yank...because I wouldn't have any idea if there is.

Originally Posted by Mikzgp
Dumb guestion, But why is that on FI? sorry to highjack
Higher stalling converters will have too much shift extension for FI cars. I've also heard that they will blow through the converter. There's a lot more power and torque to account for with FI.

Last edited by 99Hawk262; Apr 15, 2008 at 09:51 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2008 | 10:37 PM
  #32  
ta_06374's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Got a 3500 installed also, very street friendly. Locks up and shifts fine without a tune. Night and day difference, comes out of the hole like a rocket, and no more dead spots!
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.