Anyone see the new Chevy truck commercial?
#22
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And most people that have F-bodies will never race, and most people that buy 4x4s never go offroad, and most people that buy SUVs would be better off with a minivan. That's not the point. There are those that want and need more power than the 5.3 offers.
#23
I'm not the only one posting from a magazine ! Secondly, what other resources do we have in order to make comparisons? Third, reviewing results from a mpg comparo, hardly constitutes as "magazine racer"!
#25
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCaL, Chino
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
then they could buy the 6.2 if they want or need the power. all i was saying was that the 5.3 is a good all around engine that will fit most peoples needs.
#26
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
that and they the EPA says the LS1 Vette's were supposed to get 24-26 on the highway. i get 31-33 with a heads/cam/bolt on car. Go figure. My dad's '08 Silverado gets 20-21 and my 2000 Silverado gets 22-23 on highway but it's a 4.8 V8 and a 5 speed. It also gets run up pretty hard and needs a plugs and wires change.
#27
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And all I was saying was that if people need/want more power than the 5.3, then they are going to get worse gas mileage. Whether it be with the Tundra's 5.7 or the GM offering's 6.0/6.2. You can't just say "well the Silverado gets better mileage than the Tundra" because of the 5.3, because they aren't comparable engines.
#29
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As you can see GM has way more truck options than toyota by far
#30
On The Tree
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCaL, Chino
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And all I was saying was that if people need/want more power than the 5.3, then they are going to get worse gas mileage. Whether it be with the Tundra's 5.7 or the GM offering's 6.0/6.2. You can't just say "well the Silverado gets better mileage than the Tundra" because of the 5.3, because they aren't comparable engines.
#31
#32
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats wrong with the 5.3? Its a great all around truck motor, I drove a 2008 silverado 4x4 through mountains, up and down curvy roads and to the beach here in the west coast and it responded beautifully.....it never felt underpowerd
As you can see GM has way more truck options than toyota by far
As you can see GM has way more truck options than toyota by far
I agree, the 4.7 needs to be replaced/re-developed.
#33
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here's a link to all five of the new commercials, toyota one is on the top
http://www.brandfreak.com/chevy-silv...-ads-2009.html
I say finally, GM bites back.
I find it pretty funny actually, except the people that replied
http://www.brandfreak.com/2009/01/ho...63856#comments
haha
http://www.brandfreak.com/chevy-silv...-ads-2009.html
I say finally, GM bites back.
I find it pretty funny actually, except the people that replied
http://www.brandfreak.com/2009/01/ho...63856#comments
haha
Last edited by BanditTA; 01-14-2009 at 11:30 AM.
#35
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it was just a number I threw out there, but a Crew Cab 4x4 Silverado with the 5.3 weighs 5348lbs... 6,000lbs with a few people and their stuff in it ain't far off. Some people want more than 315hp for stuff like that.