Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

Anyone see the new Chevy truck commercial?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2009, 06:54 PM
  #21  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
My1st Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: B-town
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Don't be a magazine racer, you are starting to wear thing again.
Old 01-12-2009, 08:02 PM
  #22  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Teal94Z
well most people dont need more towing capability than the 5.3 and the better mpg just makes it that much of a better buy
And most people that have F-bodies will never race, and most people that buy 4x4s never go offroad, and most people that buy SUVs would be better off with a minivan. That's not the point. There are those that want and need more power than the 5.3 offers.
Old 01-12-2009, 08:03 PM
  #23  
TECH Fanatic
 
25psi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: htown
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by My1st Truck
Don't be a magazine racer, you are starting to wear thing again.
I'm not the only one posting from a magazine ! Secondly, what other resources do we have in order to make comparisons? Third, reviewing results from a mpg comparo, hardly constitutes as "magazine racer"!
Old 01-12-2009, 08:33 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
My1st Truck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: B-town
Posts: 1,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

How about manf ratings and the EPA. The EPA is not Bias.
Old 01-13-2009, 04:28 PM
  #25  
On The Tree
 
Teal94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCaL, Chino
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
And most people that have F-bodies will never race, and most people that buy 4x4s never go offroad, and most people that buy SUVs would be better off with a minivan. That's not the point. There are those that want and need more power than the 5.3 offers.
then they could buy the 6.2 if they want or need the power. all i was saying was that the 5.3 is a good all around engine that will fit most peoples needs.
Old 01-13-2009, 05:38 PM
  #26  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (30)
 
Cole Train's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MN
Posts: 2,829
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 25psi
We can go by stats all you want. But in the real world, where test have been performed, they have lost.
that and they the EPA says the LS1 Vette's were supposed to get 24-26 on the highway. i get 31-33 with a heads/cam/bolt on car. Go figure. My dad's '08 Silverado gets 20-21 and my 2000 Silverado gets 22-23 on highway but it's a 4.8 V8 and a 5 speed. It also gets run up pretty hard and needs a plugs and wires change.
Old 01-13-2009, 06:13 PM
  #27  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Teal94Z
then they could buy the 6.2 if they want or need the power. all i was saying was that the 5.3 is a good all around engine that will fit most peoples needs.
And all I was saying was that if people need/want more power than the 5.3, then they are going to get worse gas mileage. Whether it be with the Tundra's 5.7 or the GM offering's 6.0/6.2. You can't just say "well the Silverado gets better mileage than the Tundra" because of the 5.3, because they aren't comparable engines.
Old 01-13-2009, 10:29 PM
  #28  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
2000Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Miami, Fl. - Hurricane Highway
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love the one with the "man step", i lost it laughing.
-Joel
Old 01-13-2009, 10:41 PM
  #29  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
GMmexican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
And most people that have F-bodies will never race, and most people that buy 4x4s never go offroad, and most people that buy SUVs would be better off with a minivan. That's not the point. There are those that want and need more power than the 5.3 offers.
Whats wrong with the 5.3? Its a great all around truck motor, I drove a 2008 silverado 4x4 through mountains, up and down curvy roads and to the beach here in the west coast and it responded beautifully.....it never felt underpowerd

As you can see GM has way more truck options than toyota by far
Old 01-14-2009, 01:51 AM
  #30  
On The Tree
 
Teal94Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoCaL, Chino
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
And all I was saying was that if people need/want more power than the 5.3, then they are going to get worse gas mileage. Whether it be with the Tundra's 5.7 or the GM offering's 6.0/6.2. You can't just say "well the Silverado gets better mileage than the Tundra" because of the 5.3, because they aren't comparable engines.
obviously if you want more power your going to have to suffer a little mpg but even compared to the toyota 4.7 the chevy 5.3/4.8 both beat it with hp and mpg.
Old 01-14-2009, 04:13 AM
  #31  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (16)
 
LS1LT1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 9,331
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Thumbs up

Originally Posted by ColeTrains'96Z28
the EPA says the LS1 Vette's were supposed to get 24-26 on the highway. i get 31-33 with a heads/cam/bolt on car. Go figure.
My (mostly stock) LS2 Corvette has gotten over 31mpg on the highway (at 65mph or less), and it's an automatic no less.
Old 01-14-2009, 10:40 AM
  #32  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by GMmexican
Whats wrong with the 5.3? Its a great all around truck motor, I drove a 2008 silverado 4x4 through mountains, up and down curvy roads and to the beach here in the west coast and it responded beautifully.....it never felt underpowerd

As you can see GM has way more truck options than toyota by far
When did I say anything was wrong with the 5.3? It's a fine motor, but some people want more than 315hp in their 6,000lb truck. Those are the people that get the 6.0/6.2. Again with you putting words in my mouth.
Originally Posted by Teal94Z
obviously if you want more power your going to have to suffer a little mpg but even compared to the toyota 4.7 the chevy 5.3/4.8 both beat it with hp and mpg.
I agree, the 4.7 needs to be replaced/re-developed.
Old 01-14-2009, 11:25 AM
  #33  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (3)
 
BanditTA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Here's a link to all five of the new commercials, toyota one is on the top

http://www.brandfreak.com/chevy-silv...-ads-2009.html

I say finally, GM bites back.

I find it pretty funny actually, except the people that replied

http://www.brandfreak.com/2009/01/ho...63856#comments

haha

Last edited by BanditTA; 01-14-2009 at 11:30 AM.
Old 01-14-2009, 10:31 PM
  #34  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
GMmexican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
When did I say anything was wrong with the 5.3? It's a fine motor, but some people want more than 315hp in their 6,000lb truck. Those are the people that get the 6.0/6.2. Again with you putting words in my mouth.


.
Wtf? 6,000 pounds? you date alot of fat chics?
Old 01-14-2009, 10:39 PM
  #35  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Well it was just a number I threw out there, but a Crew Cab 4x4 Silverado with the 5.3 weighs 5348lbs... 6,000lbs with a few people and their stuff in it ain't far off. Some people want more than 315hp for stuff like that.



Quick Reply: Anyone see the new Chevy truck commercial?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:22 PM.