NEW: Lamborghini Murciélago LP670-4 SV
03-04-2009 | 04:55 PM
#24
03-04-2009 | 05:44 PM
#25
03-04-2009 | 08:28 PM
#28
The Murcielago is an evolution of the Diablo, and the wing on the LP670-4 SV is reminiscent of the wing on the Diablo GTR. It's not an accident that the cars look so similar, and I wasn't even the first person to acknowledge that the wing is somewhat of a "throwback." I swear, some people will argue about anything.
The only thing reminiscent about the wing on this car and the GTR is the fact that its black and at the back of the car. Beyond that, its different.
I am not arguing just to argue, I think your wrong. So I am stating my opinion.
I also wish this car was RWD. The Diablo SV lost the AWD for weight savings and for racing.
03-04-2009 | 10:06 PM
#30
All the best supercars are RWD, for a reason, driver control and feedback, weight distribution, less weight, better steering feel, more fun to drive and control I could go on and on. A good driver wants RWD....
03-04-2009 | 10:07 PM
#31
03-04-2009 | 10:32 PM
#32
***Repost Police***
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
I wouldn't say that. The Diablo 6.0 is an "evolution" of the original Diablo. The Murcielago is a completely different car. So this is an "evolution" of the LP640, which was an "evolution" of the original Murcielago.
The only thing reminiscent about the wing on this car and the GTR is the fact that its black and at the back of the car. Beyond that, its different.
I am not arguing just to argue, I think your wrong. So I am stating my opinion.
I also wish this car was RWD. The Diablo SV lost the AWD for weight savings and for racing.
The only thing reminiscent about the wing on this car and the GTR is the fact that its black and at the back of the car. Beyond that, its different.
I am not arguing just to argue, I think your wrong. So I am stating my opinion.
I also wish this car was RWD. The Diablo SV lost the AWD for weight savings and for racing.
