Edmunds Full-Test & Video - Refreshed 2010 Ford Mustang GT
03-12-2009, 07:47 AM
#21
Administrator
Dropping 300lbs isn't, unless you want to drive a gutted out POS.
03-12-2009, 08:01 AM
#22
TECH Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gulf Shores and DC
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love the new camaro...but am pissed by the weight gain...that is going to **** up its transient maneuverability.
As for the Gt vs RS debate...the V6 will weight more and have less torque...so unless your GT driver is an abecedarian this is a moot point.
W
As for the Gt vs RS debate...the V6 will weight more and have less torque...so unless your GT driver is an abecedarian this is a moot point.
W
03-12-2009, 09:52 AM
#24
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
03-12-2009, 11:31 AM
#25
Thats the most stupid thing I ever heard....HP costs money, lots of it. For example, LS6 intake $350 for 10-15 hp. On a fbody you can descreatly and easily lose 200lbs and it will cost nothing...
Last edited by 99_Z28; 03-12-2009 at 11:49 AM.
03-12-2009, 11:56 AM
#26
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
once you hit a certain point it is more expensive to lose weight than to gain power
03-12-2009, 12:19 PM
#27
03-12-2009, 12:39 PM
#28
TECH Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
power mods go farther, braking mods do more, same w/ handling
in addition it is easier on the drivetrain to lug around less weight. axles last longer, easier on transmissions, easier on brakes etc.
03-12-2009, 12:42 PM
#29
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If all you are doing is considering straightline speed, I have to wonder why you are spending $30k+ on a brand new car. Yes, 300lbs is in general responsible for ~30hp all other things considered. But that extra weight takes a noticeable toll on handling and braking. And you can not DISCRETELY drop 200-300lbs from an F-body without giving up certain creature comforts that most people don't want to go without.
03-12-2009, 01:27 PM
#30
I have a feeling that the Camaro SS won't be too far in the 12s... Mustang GTs run mid 13s on a bad day. In 2011 who knows. But the difference is the Mustang has quite a bit more torque than the V6 Camaro, and weighs the same (possibly less). Whereas yes the Camaro SS will be faster, but it's also gonna weigh 300lbs more. Some people value a big weight difference over a moderate power difference.
03-12-2009, 01:38 PM
#31
Check out the 370z vs GT article. The overall feel of the car was the biggest complaint of the GT. Initial reports on the new camaro suggest feel is one of its strong points. Weight is only one of many things that determines how a car will drive.
03-12-2009, 01:46 PM
#32
***Repost Police***
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 370Z is a sub-3400lb sports car... both the Mustang and the Camaro are not. Of course the Mustang is going to feel heavier than the 370Z. Just like I'm sure the Camaro will feel heavier than the Mustang. 300lbs is not a "slight weight advantage."
