Automotive News, Media & Press Television | Magazines | Industry News

2012 Camaro ZL1 Nurburgring 7:41

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-06-2011, 01:10 PM
  #21  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by sweetC5
Gm also stated the car was not driven by a pro, and there was a couple hundred punds of extra weight in the car with a cage and all there data equipment!
Originally Posted by UltraZLS1
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=175148

Wow.

It beat the Lamborghini Murcielago. Ford GT. 06 Zo6. 1 second behind Porsche GT3. GM engineer driving. Jesus...
I'll take one of the car's designers over a "pro" driver if I'm trying to get my best time. Especially the guys that GM has.
Old 10-06-2011, 02:36 PM
  #22  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

^^^ So you don't think Ron Fellows, John Magnussen or Johnny O'Connell could have done better?
Old 10-06-2011, 02:41 PM
  #23  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With practice, maybe. It depends on how much experience that GM tester has with that particular car.
Old 10-06-2011, 03:27 PM
  #24  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
jmurray87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 1,894
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Video has been posted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mhjG...ayer_embedded#!
Old 10-06-2011, 03:37 PM
  #25  
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
UltraZLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Hanover, Michigan
Posts: 1,264
Received 55 Likes on 40 Posts

Default

Wow. Looks like they even had a passenger. I dont see a reason why this car cant hit high 7:30's with some more time and 300 lbs less weight (no cage, passenger or testing equipment)
Old 10-06-2011, 03:39 PM
  #26  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
RaggedRides's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Wilkes-barre
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Funny.. I didn't even like the 5th generation Camaro until seeing that number. Now I want a ZL1. That video reminds me of Forza.
Old 10-06-2011, 04:08 PM
  #27  
TECH Enthusiast
 
88blackgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone know on average what a rolling start adds time wise for a car of this caliber?
Old 10-06-2011, 04:10 PM
  #28  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
DoggyB22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,677
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Gotta love the ZL1! Now Chevy needs to bring out the track/street Z28
Old 10-06-2011, 05:17 PM
  #29  
Launching!
 
MI-Z/28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

High HP vehicles love the ring. I'd like to see the ZL1 run on a shorter track like Laguna Seca. I bet its weight and size would show more.
Old 10-06-2011, 08:37 PM
  #30  
TECH Fanatic
 
TransAmWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,313
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jmurray87
That was pretty cool, it seems pretty well balanced. However, the exhaust on the car doesn't sound too good at all. I'm sure a set of LT's or a catless midpipe would change that easily though
Old 10-06-2011, 10:09 PM
  #31  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
tomsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dover delaware
Posts: 278
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 88blackgt
Anyone know on average what a rolling start adds time wise for a car of this caliber?
I believe most if not all recent tests start out rolling and i believe its 45 or 60mph. The viper zr1 ect ect have started the timing this way. I will double check tomorrow so dont hold it as gospel. And to answer your question, if it takes the car 4 sec 0-60 then you would just add 4 secs?
Old 10-07-2011, 01:51 AM
  #32  
TECH Veteran
 
TriShield's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ Hometown: Aberdeen, SD
Posts: 4,231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I could be wrong, but it does look like the car has more left in it judging by the video.
Old 10-07-2011, 01:27 PM
  #33  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
djsanchez2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Simi Valley, CA.
Posts: 2,727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wow pretty nice run! I was kinda bumbed that they withheld the G-meter numerical readout.

Just out of curiosity what MPH did the Z06 and the ZR1 hit on the long straight?
Old 10-07-2011, 01:33 PM
  #34  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (15)
 
MasterTomos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northeast Iowa
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Lol @ all the threads full of people saying it's heavy, wont handle well because of it, and cant touch the GT500....

The ZL1 isn't the disappointment everyone was hoping for...
Old 10-07-2011, 03:34 PM
  #35  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
tomsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dover delaware
Posts: 278
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With the pics Iv seen blown up it looks like its not the cup tires which shouls take another 7 or so seconds off easily on that run. Also it looks like it did a full lap of 20832m instead of 20600m. check out the list. Wiki says that its about a 7 second difference between the full lap and the non full lap. With that said you could take off another 14sec or so off the lap with optional cup tires and the partial lap that everyone else runs thats ahead of it on the list. That would put here right up there with the ENZO, GTR and the 2nd fastest ZR! time since they used the shorter lap!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...eife_lap_times
Old 10-07-2011, 04:25 PM
  #36  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
TheHitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waffle Land
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomsws6
With the pics Iv seen blown up it looks like its not the cup tires which shouls take another 7 or so seconds off easily on that run. Also it looks like it did a full lap of 20832m instead of 20600m. check out the list. Wiki says that its about a 7 second difference between the full lap and the non full lap. With that said you could take off another 14sec or so off the lap with optional cup tires and the partial lap that everyone else runs thats ahead of it on the list. That would put here right up there with the ENZO, GTR and the 2nd fastest ZR! time since they used the shorter lap!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...eife_lap_times
The Enzo was only tested once. It has a lot left in it. As for the GT-R it has a little left in it and as for the ZR1, well we know what that's capable of.
Old 10-07-2011, 06:57 PM
  #37  
***Repost Police***
 
Irunelevens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tomsws6
With the pics Iv seen blown up it looks like its not the cup tires which shouls take another 7 or so seconds off easily on that run. Also it looks like it did a full lap of 20832m instead of 20600m. check out the list. Wiki says that its about a 7 second difference between the full lap and the non full lap. With that said you could take off another 14sec or so off the lap with optional cup tires and the partial lap that everyone else runs thats ahead of it on the list. That would put here right up there with the ENZO, GTR and the 2nd fastest ZR! time since they used the shorter lap!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...eife_lap_times
Please tell me you don't think it is actually close in performance to any of those cars.
Old 10-07-2011, 07:12 PM
  #38  
Launching!
iTrader: (2)
 
tomsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dover delaware
Posts: 278
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Irunelevens
Please tell me you don't think it is actually close in performance to any of those cars.
Why not? Im just looking at the facts. And lets be honest, 7 sec on a 13 miles course is not all that far fetched.
Old 10-07-2011, 08:36 PM
  #39  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

Originally Posted by MasterTomos
Lol @ all the threads full of people saying it's heavy, wont handle well because of it, and cant touch the GT500....

The ZL1 isn't the disappointment the ford boys and 5th gen haters was hoping for...


this car is going to silence alot of doubters.
Old 10-08-2011, 04:16 AM
  #40  
On The Tree
iTrader: (2)
 
TheHitman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Waffle Land
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomsws6
Why not? Im just looking at the facts. And lets be honest, 7 sec on a 13 miles course is not all that far fetched.
You really think the ZL1 would match the Enzo around a track with similar drivers and tires? The Enzo is just as capable as the Viper ACR or ZR1, but since they are more rare and expensive, there is less of an opportunity to retest the car.


Quick Reply: 2012 Camaro ZL1 Nurburgring 7:41



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.